Literature DB >> 16117994

Treating diabetes to accepted standards of care: a 10-year projection of the estimated economic and health impact in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States.

Michael E Minshall1, Stéphane Roze, Andrew J Palmer, William J Valentine, Volker Foos, Joshua Ray, Claudia Graham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the health-economic impact of maintaining glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) values in all US patients with currently uncontrolled type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus at the American Diabetes Association (ADA) standard of 7.0% and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) target of 6.5% compared with maintenance at current population-based values.
METHODS: The CORE-Center for Outcomes Research Diabetes Model was used to predict costs and outcomes for patients with uncontrolled type 1 and type 2 diabetes who remain at established population mean HbA(1c) values in comparison with those for patients who maintain the standard value of 7.0% or the target value of 6.5%. The analysis was run from a societal perspective over a 10-year time horizon. The costs of treating complications and medication costs were retrieved from published sources. Costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum. Sensitivity analyses were performed on the discount rate and time horizon.
RESULTS: This analysis found that maintaining HbA(1c) at the ADA standard value of 7.0% and the AACE target value of 6.5% in patients with uncontrolled type 1 and type 2 diabetes could achieve total direct medical cost savings of nearly 35 US dollars and 50 billion US dollars , respectively, over 10 years. When indirect cost savings were included, the total savings increased to between nearly 50 billion US dollars and 72 billion US dollars for these respective HbA(1c) targets, corresponding to 4% and 6% of the total annual US health care costs of 1.3 trillion US dollars. Reduced savings were observed with a higher discount rate and shorter time horizon, but savings increased as the time horizon became longer. These cost savings must be weighed against the cost of reaching the HbA(1c) goals and the likelihood of achieving the clinical objectives.
CONCLUSIONS: Efficient targeting of financial resources toward the goal of lowering HbA(1c) in line with published guidelines could lead to financial savings in the range from nearly 35 billion US dollars to 72 billion US dollars over the next 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16117994     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  13 in total

Review 1.  The effects of quality of care on costs: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Teryl K Nuckols; José J Escarce; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Miscoding and other user errors: importance of ongoing education for proper blood glucose monitoring procedures.

Authors:  Linda E Schrock
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07

3.  Cost implications to health care payers of improving glucose management among adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Teryl K Nuckols; Elizabeth A McGlynn; John Adams; Julie Lai; Myong-Hyun Go; Joan Keesey; Julia E Aledort
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Vigorous exercise and diabetic, hypertensive, and hypercholesterolemia medication use.

Authors:  Paul T Williams; Barry Franklin
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Ascensia WinGLUCOFACTS Professional Software improves diabetes health outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Janssen; Manuel Portalatin; Jane Wallace; Weiping Zhong; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-01

Review 6.  Biphasic insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an evidence-based medicine review.

Authors:  S C L Gough; J Tibaldi
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  Cost-effectiveness of diabetes case management for low-income populations.

Authors:  Todd P Gilmer; Stéphane Roze; William J Valentine; Katrina Emy-Albrecht; Joshua A Ray; David Cobden; Lars Nicklasson; Athena Philis-Tsimikas; Andrew J Palmer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Economic outcomes associated with microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a US claims data analysis.

Authors:  Elise M Pelletier; Boyung Shim; Rami Ben-Joseph; J Jaime Caro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Incremental risk-factor reduction improves overall cardiovascular benefit: is it time to abandon the silos?

Authors:  Jan Basile; Mark Houston; Carlos Ferrario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  A retrospective longitudinal cohort study of antihypertensive drug use and new-onset diabetes in Taiwanese patients.

Authors:  Ching-Ya Huang; Tsochiang Ma; Liyun Tien; Yow-Wen Hsieh; Shwu-Yi Lee; Hung-Yi Chen; Gwo-Ping Jong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.