Literature DB >> 21456492

Patient, staff and physician satisfaction: a new model, instrument and their implications.

Anne S York1, Kim A McCarthy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Customer satisfaction's importance is well-documented in the marketing literature and is rapidly gaining wide acceptance in the healthcare industry. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new customer-satisfaction measuring method - Reichheld's ultimate question - and compare it with traditional techniques using data gathered from four healthcare clinics. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A new survey method, called the ultimate question, was used to collect patient satisfaction data. It was subsequently compared with the data collected via an existing method.
FINDINGS: Findings suggest that the ultimate question provides similar ratings to existing models at lower costs. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: A relatively small sample size may affect the generalizability of the results; it is also possible that potential spill-over effects exist owing to two patient satisfaction surveys administered at the same time. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This new ultimate question method greatly improves the process and ease with which hospital or clinic administrators are able to collect patient (as well as staff and physician) satisfaction data in healthcare settings. Also, the feedback gained from this method is actionable and can be used to make strategic improvements that will impact business and ultimately increase profitability. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The paper's real value is pinpointing specific quality improvement areas based not just on patient ratings but also physician and staff satisfaction, which often underlie patients' clinical experiences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21456492     DOI: 10.1108/09526861111105121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur        ISSN: 0952-6862


  8 in total

1.  Examining patients' perceptions of care to identify opportunities for quality improvement in psychiatric inpatient hospitals.

Authors:  Glorimar Ortiz
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Association of Patients' Perception of Quality of Healthcare Received and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake: An Analysis of 2 National Surveys in the USA.

Authors:  Karan Chawla; Angesom Kibreab; Victor Scott; Edward L Lee; Farshad Aduli; Hassan Brim; Hassan Ashktorab; Charles D Howell; Adeyinka O Laiyemo
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Factors contributing towards patient's choice of a hospital clinic from the patients' and managers' perspective.

Authors:  Mohammadkarim Bahadori; Ehsan Teymourzadeh; Ramin Ravangard; Ali Nasiri; Mehdi Raadabadi; Khalil Alimohammadzadeh
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2016-05-25

4.  Do Academic Health Care Systems Really Value Education? A Survey of Academic Plastic Surgeons.

Authors:  Helen H Sun; Navid Pourtaheri; Jeffrey E Janis; Devra B Becker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-10-16

5.  A Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase the Frequency of Vaginal Delivery in Brazilian Hospitals.

Authors:  Paulo Borem; Rita de Cássia Sanchez; Jacqueline Torres; Pedro Delgado; Ademir Jose Petenate; Daniel Peres; Gareth Parry; Ana Pilar Betrán; Pierre Barker
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.623

6.  [Influence of the covid-19 pandemic period of alert on perceived quality of hospital emergencies].

Authors:  J J López-Picazo Ferrer; I Vidal-Abarca Gutiérrez; D Beteta Fernández; M López Ibáñez
Journal:  J Healthc Qual Res       Date:  2020-11-21

7.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Hospital: Inpatient's Perceived Quality in Spain.

Authors:  Julio J Lopez-Picazo; Inmaculada Vidal-Abarca; Dolores Beteta; Mercedes López-Ibáñez; Elisa García-Vázquez
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-03-03

8.  Nurse Motivation, Engagement and Well-Being before an Electronic Medical Record System Implementation: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Rebecca M Jedwab; Alison M Hutchinson; Elizabeth Manias; Rafael A Calvo; Naomi Dobroff; Nicholas Glozier; Bernice Redley
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.