Literature DB >> 21455329

Does deep sedation impact the results of 48 hours catheterless pH testing?

Vineet Korrapati1, Jay P Babich, Anil Balani, James H Grendell, Kavita R Kongara.   

Abstract

AIM: To study a cohort of patients undergoing 48 h Bravo pH testing receiving deep sedation with propofol.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 197 patients (81 male, 116 female) who underwent Bravo esophageal pH monitoring from July 2003 to January 2008. All patients underwent Bravo pH probe placement via esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and received propofol for sedation. Patients on a proton pump inhibitor (89 patients) were excluded. Acid reflux variables measured included the total, upright, and supine fractions of time at pH < 4 and DeMeester score, and were compared between day 1 and day 2.
RESULTS: Of the 108 patients that were included in the study, the most common indication for Bravo pH monitoring was heartburn, with chest pain being the second most common. A signed rank test revealed no statistically significant difference between day 1 and day 2 reflux episodes.
CONCLUSION: Patients who received propofol for sedation for EGD with Bravo pH capsule placement did not experience any significant difference in reflux episodes from day 1 to day 2.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bravo study; Esophagus; Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Propofol; pH capsule

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21455329      PMCID: PMC3068265          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i10.1304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  13 in total

Review 1.  French-Belgian Consensus Conference on Adult Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease 'Diagnosis and Treatment': report of a meeting held in Paris, France, on 21-22 January 1999. The Jury of the consensus conference.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.566

2.  Wireless esophageal pH monitoring: new technique means new questions.

Authors:  Yasser M Bhat; Kevin M McGrath; Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.062

3.  Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Kenneth R DeVault; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  The Bravo pH capsule system.

Authors:  M A Kwiatek; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.088

5.  Lansoprazole compared with ranitidine for the treatment of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J E Richter; D R Campbell; P J Kahrilas; B Huang; C Fludas
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-06-26

6.  Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities.

Authors:  R Fass; R Hell; R E Sampliner; G Pulliam; E Graver; V Hartz; C Johnson; P Jaffe
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Value of extended recording time with wireless pH monitoring in evaluating gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Chandra Prakash; Ray E Clouse
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Jörgen Wenner; Folke Johnsson; Jan Johansson; Stefan Oberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Joel E Richter; Tina Ours; Jason M Guardino; Jennifer Chapman; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Bravo (wireless) ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: how do day 1 and day 2 results compare?

Authors:  Matthew L Bechtold; Jason-Scott L Holly; Klaus Thaler; John B Marshall
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  5 in total

1.  Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with conscious sedation does not interfere with catheter-based 24-h pH monitoring.

Authors:  Yung-Kuan Tsou; Jau-Min Lien; Chin-Kuo Chen; Cheng-Hui Lin; Hsing-Yu Chen; Mu-Shien Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Clinical value of wireless pH-monitoring of gastro-esophageal reflux in children before and after proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Michaela Boström; Ola Thorsson; Ervin Toth; Daniel Agardh
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Wireless ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in dogs with clinical signs interpreted as gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  P H Kook; J Kempf; M Ruetten; C E Reusch
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Quantification of gastroesophageal regurgitation in brachycephalic dogs.

Authors:  Carla Appelgrein; Giselle Hosgood; Mary Thompson; Flaminia Coiacetto
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.175

5.  Clinical utility and tolerability of JSPH-1 wireless esophageal pH monitoring system.

Authors:  Jun-Nan Li; Chun-Lun Liu; Xiao-Hong Tao
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.