Literature DB >> 21455085

A randomized comparison of infraclavicular and supraclavicular continuous peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia.

Edward R Mariano1, NavParkash S Sandhu, Vanessa J Loland, Michael L Bishop, Sarah J Madison, Reid A Abrams, Matthew J Meunier, Eliza J Ferguson, Brian M Ilfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of single-injection supraclavicular nerve blocks is well established, no controlled study of continuous supraclavicular blocks is available, and their relative risks and benefits remain unknown. In contrast, the analgesia provided by continuous infraclavicular nerve blocks has been validated in randomized controlled trials. We therefore compared supraclavicular with infraclavicular perineural local anesthetic infusion following distal upper-extremity surgery.
METHODS: Preoperatively, subjects were randomly assigned to receive a brachial plexus perineural catheter in either the infraclavicular or supraclavicular location using an ultrasound-guided nonstimulating catheter technique. Postoperatively, subjects were discharged home with a portable pump (400-mL reservoir) infusing 0.2% ropivacaine (basal rate of 8 mL/hr; 4-mL bolus dose; 30-min lockout interval). Subjects were followed up by telephone on an outpatient basis. The primary outcome was the average pain score on the day after surgery.
RESULTS: Sixty subjects were enrolled, with 31 and 29 randomized to receive an infraclavicular and supraclavicular catheter, respectively. All perineural catheters were successfully placed per protocol. Because of protocol violations and missing data, an intention-to-treat analysis was not used; rather, only subjects with catheters in situ and whom we were able to contact were included in the analyses. The day after surgery, subjects in the infraclavicular group reported average pain as median of 2.0 (10th-90th percentiles, 0.5-6.0) compared with 4.0 (10th-90th percentiles, 0.6-7.7) in the supraclavicular group (P = 0.025). Similarly, least pain scores (numeric rating scale) on postoperative day 1 were lower in the infraclavicular group compared with the supraclavicular group (0.5 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-3.5] vs 2.0 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-4.7], respectively; P = 0.040). Subjects in the infraclavicular group required less rescue oral analgesic (oxycodone, in milligrams) for breakthrough pain in the 18 to 24 hrs after surgery compared with the supraclavicular group (0.0 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-5.0] vs 5.0 [10th-90th percentiles, 0.0-15.0], respectively; P = 0.048). There were no statistically significant differences in other secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: A local anesthetic infusion via an infraclavicular perineural catheter provides superior analgesia compared with a supraclavicular perineural catheter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21455085     DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318203069b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  9 in total

Review 1.  Infraclavicular brachial plexus block in adults: a comprehensive review based on a unified nomenclature system.

Authors:  An-Chih Hsu; Yu-Ting Tai; Ko-Huan Lin; Han-Yun Yao; Han-Liang Chiang; Bing-Ying Ho; Sheng-Feng Yang; Jui-An Lin; Ching-Lung Ko
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Does Brachial Plexus Blockade Result in Improved Pain Scores After Distal Radius Fracture Fixation? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  David K Galos; David P Taormina; Alexander Crespo; David Y Ding; Anthony Sapienza; Sudheer Jain; Nirmal C Tejwani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Complications following regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for the treatment of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Ryan Lee; Danny Lee; Pradip Ramamurti; Safa Fassihi; Jessica H Heyer; Monica Stadecker; Michael Webber; Alice Hughes; Rajeev Pandarinath
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  The role of continuous peripheral nerve blocks.

Authors:  José Aguirre; Alicia Del Moral; Irina Cobo; Alain Borgeat; Stephan Blumenthal
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-18

5.  Low-Volume Brachial Plexus Block Providing Surgical Anesthesia for Distal Arm Surgery Comparing Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular, and Axillary Approach: A Randomized Observer Blind Trial.

Authors:  Mojgan Vazin; Kenneth Jensen; Danja L Kristensen; Mathias Hjort; Katrine Tanggaard; Manoj K Karmakar; Thomas F Bendtsen; Jens Børglum
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Comparison of the onset time between 0.375% ropivacaine and 0.25% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Ha-Jung Kim; Sooho Lee; Ki Jinn Chin; Jin-Sun Kim; Hyungtae Kim; Young-Jin Ro; Won Uk Koh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Supraclavicular vs. Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Nerve Blocks: Clinical, Pharmacological, and Anatomical Considerations.

Authors:  Alan D Kaye; Varsha Allampalli; Paul Fisher; Aaron J Kaye; Aaron Tran; Elyse M Cornett; Farnad Imani; Amber N Edinoff; Soudabeh Djalali Motlagh; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-10-31

8.  Automated Boluses and Delayed-Start Timers Prolong Perineural Local Anesthetic Infusions and Analgesia Following Ankle and Wrist Orthopedic Surgery: A Case-Control Series.

Authors:  John J Finneran Iv; Paola Baskin; William T Kent; Eric R Hentzen; Alexandra K Schwartz; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-09-28

9.  Ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks to treat postamputation phantom limb pain: a multicenter, randomized, quadruple-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Bahareh Khatibi; Kamal Maheshwari; Sarah J Madison; Wael Ali Sakr Esa; Edward R Mariano; Michael L Kent; Steven Hanling; Daniel I Sessler; James C Eisenach; Steven P Cohen; Edward J Mascha; Chao Ma; Jennifer A Padwal; Alparslan Turan
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 7.926

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.