| Literature DB >> 31076946 |
An-Chih Hsu1,2, Yu-Ting Tai1,3,2, Ko-Huan Lin4, Han-Yun Yao1, Han-Liang Chiang5,6, Bing-Ying Ho1, Sheng-Feng Yang1, Jui-An Lin7,8,9, Ching-Lung Ko10.
Abstract
Over the last decade, considerable progress has been made regarding infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB) in adults, especially since the introduction of ultrasound guidance. The advancements in ICB have been attributed to the development of various approaches to improve the success rate and reduce complications. This has also necessitated a unified nomenclature system to facilitate comparison among different approaches. This review aimed to propose an anatomical nomenclature system by classifying ICB approaches into proximal and distal ones to aid future research and provide practice advisories according to recent updates. We also comprehensively discuss various aspects of this nomenclature system. Our review suggests that ultrasound-guided ICB should be categorized as an advanced technique that should be performed under supervision and dual guidance. For one-shot block, the conventional distal approach is still preferred but should be modified to follow ergonomic practice, with the arm in the proper position. For continuous ICB, the proximal approach is promising for reducing local anesthetic volume and increasing efficacy. Nevertheless, further studies are warranted in this direction. We provide practice advisories to maximize safety and minimize adverse events, and recommend designing future studies on ICB according to these findings based on the unified nomenclature system.Entities:
Keywords: Adult; Brachial plexus block; Infraclavicular; Terminology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31076946 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-019-02638-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anesth ISSN: 0913-8668 Impact factor: 2.078