Literature DB >> 21454139

Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Mirvat A Alasnag1, Delair O Gardi, Mahir Elder, Hari Kannam, Farhan Ali, Mircea Petrina, Vipin Kheterpal, Mariah S Hout, Theodore L Schreiber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are at high risk for cardiovascular collapse during the procedure may benefit from prophylactic circulatory support. The objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of prophylactic use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used the Impella 2.5 for partial circulatory support during 60 consecutive elective high-risk PCI cases over 20 months. All patients either were deemed inoperable by the cardiac surgeons or were offered bypass surgery but declined.
RESULTS: The patients had multiple risk factors including hypertension (95%), diabetes (52%), chronic pulmonary disease (23%), prior myocardial infarction (62%) and prior bypass surgery (18%). Forty-five percent presented with acute coronary syndrome. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 23%±15%. Nearly all patients had multivessel disease (93%), and 60% had left main disease. The average SYNTAX score was 30±9. Despite lesion complexity and high-risk factors, we achieved an angiographic success rate of 96%. Left main lesions were treated in 55% of the patients, and 83% of patients had multiple lesions treated. There was one procedural death. At 30 days postintervention, mortality was 5%, and rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization and urgent bypass surgery were 0%.
CONCLUSIONS: The single-center experience reported here demonstrates that use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI in the "real world" - outside the controlled environment of a clinical trial - is safe and feasible.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21454139     DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2011.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med        ISSN: 1878-0938


  7 in total

1.  Use of impella ventricular assist device in patients with severe coronary artery disease presenting with cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Venkata K Mukku; Qiangjun Cai; Syed Gilani; Ken Fujise; Alejandro Barbagelata
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-02-07

3.  Percutaneous Hemodynamic Support (Impella) in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure and/or Cardiogenic Shock Not Eligible to PROTECT II Trial.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Venkata Kishore Mukku; Syed Gilani; Ken Fujise; Alejandro Barbagelata
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-12

Review 4.  Utility of adjunctive modalities in Coronary chronic total occlusion intervention.

Authors:  Hemal Bhatt; Sean Janzer; Jon C George
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-02-24

5.  The Duration of Impella 2.5 Circulatory Support and Length of Hospital Stay of Patients Undergoing High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Obiora Anusionwu; Daniel Fischman; Pramil Cheriyath
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2012-07-20

6.  Unprotected versus protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 in patients with multivessel disease and severely reduced left ventricular function.

Authors:  Tobias Becher; Frederik Eder; Stefan Baumann; Dirk Loßnitzer; Berit Pollmann; Michael Behnes; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Effect of Atrioventricular Dyssynchrony on Impella Hemodynamics: Mechanism and Its Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Raj Baljepally; Hassan Tahir
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2021-07-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.