STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although underutilized, the vaginal contraceptive ring has several advantages over other contraceptive methods that could benefit adolescents. We examined factors that may influence willingness to try the vaginal ring including: sexual and contraceptive history, genital comfort, and vaginal ring characteristics. DESIGN: Cross sectional SETTING: Midwestern adolescent health clinics PARTICIPANTS: Adolescent women (N = 200; 14-18 years; 89% African-American) INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All participants received education about the vaginal ring and viewed pictures demonstrating insertion; they then completed a visual/audio computer-assisted self interview. The primary outcome variable, willingness to try the vaginal ring, was a single Likert-scale item. RESULTS: Over half the participants reported knowledge of the vaginal ring with healthcare providers identified as the most important source of contraceptive information. Comfort with one's genitals, insertion and removal, using alternative methods of insertion, and knowing positive method characteristics were significantly associated with willingness to try the vaginal ring. A decreased willingness to try the vaginal ring was related to concerns of the ring getting lost inside or falling out of the vagina. CONCLUSIONS: Willingness to try the ring was associated with positive feelings about genitals (e.g., comfort with appearance, hygiene, function). Thus, to increase willingness to try the vaginal ring among adolescents, providers should make it common practice to discuss basic female reproductive anatomy, raise awareness about female genital health and address concerns about their genitals. Providers can offer alternative insertion techniques (e.g., gloves) to make use more accessible. These strategies may increase vaginal ring use among adolescents. 2011 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although underutilized, the vaginal contraceptive ring has several advantages over other contraceptive methods that could benefit adolescents. We examined factors that may influence willingness to try the vaginal ring including: sexual and contraceptive history, genital comfort, and vaginal ring characteristics. DESIGN: Cross sectional SETTING: Midwestern adolescent health clinics PARTICIPANTS: Adolescent women (N = 200; 14-18 years; 89% African-American) INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All participants received education about the vaginal ring and viewed pictures demonstrating insertion; they then completed a visual/audio computer-assisted self interview. The primary outcome variable, willingness to try the vaginal ring, was a single Likert-scale item. RESULTS: Over half the participants reported knowledge of the vaginal ring with healthcare providers identified as the most important source of contraceptive information. Comfort with one's genitals, insertion and removal, using alternative methods of insertion, and knowing positive method characteristics were significantly associated with willingness to try the vaginal ring. A decreased willingness to try the vaginal ring was related to concerns of the ring getting lost inside or falling out of the vagina. CONCLUSIONS: Willingness to try the ring was associated with positive feelings about genitals (e.g., comfort with appearance, hygiene, function). Thus, to increase willingness to try the vaginal ring among adolescents, providers should make it common practice to discuss basic female reproductive anatomy, raise awareness about female genital health and address concerns about their genitals. Providers can offer alternative insertion techniques (e.g., gloves) to make use more accessible. These strategies may increase vaginal ring use among adolescents. 2011 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Christine Dehlendorf; Diana Greene Foster; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Claire Brindis; Mary Bradsberry; Philip Darney Journal: Perspect Sex Reprod Health Date: 2011-08-01
Authors: Sara E Vargas; Miriam M Midoun; Melissa Guillen; Melissa L Getz; Kristen Underhill; Caroline Kuo; Kate M Guthrie Journal: Perspect Sex Reprod Health Date: 2019-05-20
Authors: Jill S Huppert; Elizabeth A Hesse; Molly A Bernard; Yang Xiao; Bin Huang; Charlotte A Gaydos; Jessica A Kahn Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: José A Bauermeister; Jesse M Golinkoff; Alex Carballo-Diéguez; Rebecca Giguere; Daniela López; Craig J Hoesley; Beatrice A Chen; Peter Anderson; Charlene S Dezzutti; Julie Strizki; Carol Sprinkle; Faye Heard; Wayne Hall; Cindy Jacobson; Jennifer Berthiaume; Ashley Mayo; Barbra A Richardson; Jeanna Piper Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2020-02
Authors: Kathleen Ridgeway; Elizabeth T Montgomery; Kevin Smith; Kristine Torjesen; Ariane van der Straten; Sharon L Achilles; Jennifer B Griffin Journal: Contraception Date: 2021-10-10 Impact factor: 3.051
Authors: Evelyne Kestelyn; Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil; Marie Michelle Umulisa; Grace Umutoni; Alice Uwingabire; Lambert Mwambarangwe; Mireille Uwineza; Stephen Agaba; Tania Crucitti; Janneke van de Wijgert; Thérèse Delvaux Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ariana W K Katz; Leila E Mansoor; Mercy Tsidya; Florence Mathebula; Devika Singh; Samantha Siva; Carolyne Akello; Tinei H Chitowa; Morgan Garcia; Lydia Soto-Torres; Elizabeth T Montgomery Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-06-28