Literature DB >> 21453916

The influence of fault on health in the immediate post-crash period following road traffic crashes.

S M Littleton1, D C Hughes, S J Poustie, B J Robinson, T Neeman, P N Smith, I D Cameron.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the early health status of people who sustained injuries during road traffic crashes (RTC) in which they were at fault (AF), with people who sustained injuries in RTC in which they were not at fault (NAF).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SUBJECTS: People presenting to the emergency department with mild to moderate musculoskeletal injuries following RTC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health status measure; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Functional Rating Index (FRI) recorded immediately post-crash.
RESULTS: 193 people participated in the study and were enrolled a mean of 9.3 days following the crash. The mean age was 37 years and 60% were female. 71% were NAF. There was a significantly higher number of females in the NAF group (65% compared with 35% males; p<0.001). Neck and back injuries were reported by 90.4% of the NAF group compared to 69.1% of the AF group (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in PCS, FRI or pain intensity between the two groups at a mean of 9.3 days after the crash. The mean MCS for the NAF group was significantly worse than for the AF group (31.4 compared to 37.3; p = 0.005). The SF-36 domain revealed a significantly worse adjusted mean role emotional score for the NAF group (23.4 compared to 32.5, p = 0.002). Females had significantly worse MCS score than males (30.6 and 38.1 respectively; p<0.001) and worse adjusted mean anxiety and depression scores (10 compared to 7.8; p = 0.002 and 7.6 compared to 5.5; p = 0.002 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite there being no difference in physical health status, the NAF group demonstrated more emotional and mental disturbance than the AF group; and this was significantly worse for females. Treatment strategies should focus on addressing early pain and disability as well as providing appropriate psychological interventions, particularly for people not at fault following RTC.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21453916     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  12 in total

1.  Return to Work After Traumatic Injury: Increased Work-Related Disability in Injured Persons Receiving Financial Compensation is Mediated by Perceived Injustice.

Authors:  Melita J Giummarra; Peter A Cameron; Jennie Ponsford; Liane Ioannou; Stephen J Gibson; Paul A Jennings; Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-06

2.  The perceptions and experiences of people injured in motor vehicle crashes in a compensation scheme setting: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Darnel Murgatroyd; Keri Lockwood; Belinda Garth; Ian D Cameron
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The University of Queensland study of physical and psychological outcomes for claimants with minor and moderate injuries following a road traffic crash (UQ SuPPORT): design and methods.

Authors:  Justin Kenardy; Michelle Heron-Delaney; Nicholas Bellamy; Michele Sterling; Luke Connelly
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2014-05-02

Review 4.  The effect of financial compensation on health outcomes following musculoskeletal injury: systematic review.

Authors:  Darnel F Murgatroyd; Petrina P Casey; Ian D Cameron; Ian A Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does Blame Impede Health Recovery After Transport Accidents?

Authors:  Nieke A Elbers; Alex Collie; Arno J Akkermans
Journal:  Psychol Inj Law       Date:  2015-02-17

Review 6.  Psychological impact of injuries sustained in motor vehicle crashes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashley Craig; Yvonne Tran; Rebecca Guest; Bamini Gopinath; Jagnoor Jagnoor; Richard A Bryant; Alex Collie; Robyn Tate; Justin Kenardy; James W Middleton; Ian Cameron
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The effect of injuries on health measured by short form 8 among a large cohort of Thai adults.

Authors:  Vasoontara Yiengprugsawan; Janneke Berecki-Gisolf; Roderick McClure; Matthew Kelly; Sam-Ang Seubsman; Adrian C Sleigh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Association between perception of fault for the crash and function, return to work and health status 1 year after road traffic injury: a registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  Belinda J Gabbe; Pamela M Simpson; Peter A Cameron; Christina L Ekegren; Elton R Edwards; Richard Page; Susan Liew; Andrew Bucknill; Richard de Steiger
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Biopsychosocial factors associated with non-recovery after a minor transport-related injury: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stella Samoborec; Rasa Ruseckaite; Darshini Ayton; Sue Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predictors of Mental Health Outcomes in Road Traffic Accident Survivors.

Authors:  Jelena Kovacevic; Maja Miskulin; Dunja Degmecic; Aleksandar Vcev; Dinko Leovic; Vladimir Sisljagic; Ivana Simic; Hrvoje Palenkic; Ivan Vcev; Ivan Miskulin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.