Literature DB >> 21453552

Application of handheld devices to field research among underserved construction worker populations: a workplace health assessment pilot study.

Alberto J Caban-Martinez1, Tainya C Clarke, Evelyn P Davila, Lora E Fleming, David J Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Novel low-cost approaches for conducting rapid health assessments and health promotion interventions among underserved worker groups are needed. Recruitment and participation of construction workers is particularly challenging due to their often transient periods of work at any one construction site, and their limited time during work to participate in such studies. In the present methodology report, we discuss the experience, advantages and disadvantages of using touch screen handheld devices for the collection of field data from a largely underserved worker population.
METHODS: In March 2010, a workplace-centered pilot study to examine the feasibility of using a handheld personal device for the rapid health assessment of construction workers in two South Florida Construction sites was undertaken. A 45-item survey instrument, including health-related questions on tobacco exposure, workplace safety practices, musculoskeletal disorders and health symptoms, was programmed onto Apple iPod Touch® devices. Language sensitive (English and Spanish) recruitment scripts, verbal consent forms, and survey questions were all preloaded onto the handheld devices. The experience (time to survey administration and capital cost) of the handheld administration method was recorded and compared to approaches available in the extant literature.
RESULTS: Construction workers were very receptive to the recruitment, interview and assessment processes conducted through the handheld devices. Some workers even welcomed the opportunity to complete the questionnaire themselves using the touch screen handheld device. A list of advantages and disadvantages emerged from this experience that may be useful in the rapid health assessment of underserved populations working in a variety of environmental and occupational health settings.
CONCLUSIONS: Handheld devices, which are relatively inexpensive, minimize survey response error, and allow for easy storage of data. These technological research modalities are useful in the collection and assessment of environmental and occupational research data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21453552      PMCID: PMC3078837          DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health        ISSN: 1476-069X            Impact factor:   5.984


  10 in total

1.  Using text messaging to contact difficult-to-reach study participants.

Authors:  Julie E Maher; Kathryn Pranian; Linda Drach; Maureen Rumptz; Carol Casciato; Jessica Guernsey
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Smoking rate trends in U.S. occupational groups: the 1987 to 2004 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  David J Lee; Lora E Fleming; Kristopher L Arheart; William G LeBlanc; Alberto J Caban; Katherine Chung-Bridges; Sharon L Christ; Kathryn E McCollister; Terry Pitman
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 3.  Interventions for preventing injuries in the construction industry.

Authors:  H F van der Molen; M M Lehtola; J Lappalainen; P L T Hoonakker; H Hsiao; R Haslam; A R Hale; J Verbeek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

4.  Handheld computers for survey and trial data collection in resource-poor settings: development and evaluation of PDACT, a Palm Pilot interviewing system.

Authors:  Christopher J Seebregts; Merrick Zwarenstein; Catherine Mathews; Lara Fairall; Alan J Flisher; Clive Seebregts; Wanjiru Mukoma; Knut-Inge Klepp
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Workers' compensation costs among construction workers: a robust regression analysis.

Authors:  Lee S Friedman; Linda S Forst
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Partnerships for environmental and occupational justice: contributions to research, capacity and public health.

Authors:  Sherry Baron; Raymond Sinclair; Devon Payne-Sturges; Jerry Phelps; Harold Zenick; Gwen W Collman; Liam R O'Fallon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Obesity in US workers: The National Health Interview Survey, 1986 to 2002.

Authors:  Alberto J Caban; David J Lee; Lora E Fleming; Orlando Gómez-Marín; William LeBlanc; Terry Pitman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Multiple health behavior changes in a cancer prevention intervention for construction workers, 2001-2003.

Authors:  Amy E Harley; Carol M Devine; Binta Beard; Anne M Stoddard; Mary K Hunt; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation.

Authors:  Rachel J Toomey; John T Ryan; Mark F McEntee; Michael G Evanoff; Dev P Chakraborty; Jonathan P McNulty; David J Manning; Edel M Thomas; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  The effectiveness of interventions for preventing injuries in the construction industry: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marika M Lehtola; Henk F van der Molen; Jorma Lappalainen; Peter L T Hoonakker; Hongwei Hsiao; Roger A Haslam; Andrew R Hale; Jos H Verbeek
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 5.043

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  A cluster randomized pilot trial of a tailored worksite smoking cessation intervention targeting Hispanic/Latino construction workers: Intervention development and research design.

Authors:  Taghrid Asfar; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Laura A McClure; Estefania C Ruano-Herreria; Danielle Sierra; G Gilford Clark; Daniel Samano; Noella A Dietz; Kenneth D Ward; Kristopher L Arheart; David J Lee
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Methodology of Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS), Malaysia, 2011.

Authors:  Azahadi Omar; Muhammad Fadhli Mohd Yusoff; Tee Guat Hiong; Tahir Aris; Jeremy Morton; Sameer Pujari
Journal:  Int J Public Health Res       Date:  2013

3.  Developing a Worksite-based Culturally Adapted Smoking Cessation Intervention for Male Hispanic/Latino Construction Workers.

Authors:  Noella A Dietz; Taghrid Asfar; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Kenneth D Ward; Katerina Santiago; Estefania C Ruano-Herreria; Laura A McClure; David J Lee
Journal:  J Smok Cessat       Date:  2018-05-11

4.  Open-source electronic data capture system offered increased accuracy and cost-effectiveness compared with paper methods in Africa.

Authors:  David G Dillon; Fraser Pirie; Stephen Rice; Cristina Pomilla; Manjinder S Sandhu; Ayesha A Motala; Elizabeth H Young
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Staff preferences towards electronic data collection from a national take-home naloxone program: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Øystein Bruun Ericson; Desiree Eide; Philipp Lobmaier; Thomas Clausen
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2022-02-16

6.  Using the iPod Touch for Patient Health Behavior Assessment and Health Promotion in Primary Care.

Authors:  Samuel N Forjuoh; Marcia G Ory; Suojin Wang; Jude Ka des Bordes; Yan Hong
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.773

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.