BACKGROUND: Novel low-cost approaches for conducting rapid health assessments and health promotion interventions among underserved worker groups are needed. Recruitment and participation of construction workers is particularly challenging due to their often transient periods of work at any one construction site, and their limited time during work to participate in such studies. In the present methodology report, we discuss the experience, advantages and disadvantages of using touch screen handheld devices for the collection of field data from a largely underserved worker population. METHODS: In March 2010, a workplace-centered pilot study to examine the feasibility of using a handheld personal device for the rapid health assessment of construction workers in two South Florida Construction sites was undertaken. A 45-item survey instrument, including health-related questions on tobacco exposure, workplace safety practices, musculoskeletal disorders and health symptoms, was programmed onto Apple iPod Touch® devices. Language sensitive (English and Spanish) recruitment scripts, verbal consent forms, and survey questions were all preloaded onto the handheld devices. The experience (time to survey administration and capital cost) of the handheld administration method was recorded and compared to approaches available in the extant literature. RESULTS: Construction workers were very receptive to the recruitment, interview and assessment processes conducted through the handheld devices. Some workers even welcomed the opportunity to complete the questionnaire themselves using the touch screen handheld device. A list of advantages and disadvantages emerged from this experience that may be useful in the rapid health assessment of underserved populations working in a variety of environmental and occupational health settings. CONCLUSIONS: Handheld devices, which are relatively inexpensive, minimize survey response error, and allow for easy storage of data. These technological research modalities are useful in the collection and assessment of environmental and occupational research data.
BACKGROUND: Novel low-cost approaches for conducting rapid health assessments and health promotion interventions among underserved worker groups are needed. Recruitment and participation of construction workers is particularly challenging due to their often transient periods of work at any one construction site, and their limited time during work to participate in such studies. In the present methodology report, we discuss the experience, advantages and disadvantages of using touch screen handheld devices for the collection of field data from a largely underserved worker population. METHODS: In March 2010, a workplace-centered pilot study to examine the feasibility of using a handheld personal device for the rapid health assessment of construction workers in two South Florida Construction sites was undertaken. A 45-item survey instrument, including health-related questions on tobacco exposure, workplace safety practices, musculoskeletal disorders and health symptoms, was programmed onto Apple iPod Touch® devices. Language sensitive (English and Spanish) recruitment scripts, verbal consent forms, and survey questions were all preloaded onto the handheld devices. The experience (time to survey administration and capital cost) of the handheld administration method was recorded and compared to approaches available in the extant literature. RESULTS: Construction workers were very receptive to the recruitment, interview and assessment processes conducted through the handheld devices. Some workers even welcomed the opportunity to complete the questionnaire themselves using the touch screen handheld device. A list of advantages and disadvantages emerged from this experience that may be useful in the rapid health assessment of underserved populations working in a variety of environmental and occupational health settings. CONCLUSIONS: Handheld devices, which are relatively inexpensive, minimize survey response error, and allow for easy storage of data. These technological research modalities are useful in the collection and assessment of environmental and occupational research data.
Authors: Julie E Maher; Kathryn Pranian; Linda Drach; Maureen Rumptz; Carol Casciato; Jessica Guernsey Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: David J Lee; Lora E Fleming; Kristopher L Arheart; William G LeBlanc; Alberto J Caban; Katherine Chung-Bridges; Sharon L Christ; Kathryn E McCollister; Terry Pitman Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: H F van der Molen; M M Lehtola; J Lappalainen; P L T Hoonakker; H Hsiao; R Haslam; A R Hale; J Verbeek Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2007-10-17
Authors: Sherry Baron; Raymond Sinclair; Devon Payne-Sturges; Jerry Phelps; Harold Zenick; Gwen W Collman; Liam R O'Fallon Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alberto J Caban; David J Lee; Lora E Fleming; Orlando Gómez-Marín; William LeBlanc; Terry Pitman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-07-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Amy E Harley; Carol M Devine; Binta Beard; Anne M Stoddard; Mary K Hunt; Glorian Sorensen Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Rachel J Toomey; John T Ryan; Mark F McEntee; Michael G Evanoff; Dev P Chakraborty; Jonathan P McNulty; David J Manning; Edel M Thomas; Patrick C Brennan Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Marika M Lehtola; Henk F van der Molen; Jorma Lappalainen; Peter L T Hoonakker; Hongwei Hsiao; Roger A Haslam; Andrew R Hale; Jos H Verbeek Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Taghrid Asfar; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Laura A McClure; Estefania C Ruano-Herreria; Danielle Sierra; G Gilford Clark; Daniel Samano; Noella A Dietz; Kenneth D Ward; Kristopher L Arheart; David J Lee Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Azahadi Omar; Muhammad Fadhli Mohd Yusoff; Tee Guat Hiong; Tahir Aris; Jeremy Morton; Sameer Pujari Journal: Int J Public Health Res Date: 2013
Authors: Noella A Dietz; Taghrid Asfar; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Kenneth D Ward; Katerina Santiago; Estefania C Ruano-Herreria; Laura A McClure; David J Lee Journal: J Smok Cessat Date: 2018-05-11
Authors: David G Dillon; Fraser Pirie; Stephen Rice; Cristina Pomilla; Manjinder S Sandhu; Ayesha A Motala; Elizabeth H Young Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 6.437