BACKGROUND: Occupational injury rates among construction workers are the highest among the major industries. A number of injury-prevention interventions have been proposed, yet the effectiveness of these is uncertain. Thus a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for preventing occupational injuries among construction workers was conducted. METHODS: Seven databases were searched, from the earliest available dates through June 2006, for published findings of injury prevention in construction studies. Acceptable study designs included RCTs; controlled before-after studies; and interrupted time series (ITS). Effect sizes of similar interventions were pooled into a meta-analysis in January 2007. RESULTS: Of 7522 titles found, four ITS studies and one controlled ITS study met the inclusion criteria. The overall methodologic quality was low. No indications of publication bias were found. Findings from a safety-campaign study and a drug-free-workplace study indicated that both interventions significantly reduced the level and the trend of injuries. Three studies that evaluated legislation did not decrease the level (ES 0.69; 95% CI=-1.70, 3.09) and made the downward trend (ES 0.28; 95% CI=0.05, 0.51) of injuries less favorable. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence was found for the effectiveness of a multifaceted safety campaign and a multifaceted drug program, but no evidence was found that legislation is effective to prevent nonfatal or fatal injuries in the construction industry.
BACKGROUND:Occupational injury rates among construction workers are the highest among the major industries. A number of injury-prevention interventions have been proposed, yet the effectiveness of these is uncertain. Thus a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for preventing occupational injuries among construction workers was conducted. METHODS: Seven databases were searched, from the earliest available dates through June 2006, for published findings of injury prevention in construction studies. Acceptable study designs included RCTs; controlled before-after studies; and interrupted time series (ITS). Effect sizes of similar interventions were pooled into a meta-analysis in January 2007. RESULTS: Of 7522 titles found, four ITS studies and one controlled ITS study met the inclusion criteria. The overall methodologic quality was low. No indications of publication bias were found. Findings from a safety-campaign study and a drug-free-workplace study indicated that both interventions significantly reduced the level and the trend of injuries. Three studies that evaluated legislation did not decrease the level (ES 0.69; 95% CI=-1.70, 3.09) and made the downward trend (ES 0.28; 95% CI=0.05, 0.51) of injuries less favorable. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence was found for the effectiveness of a multifaceted safety campaign and a multifaceted drug program, but no evidence was found that legislation is effective to prevent nonfatal or fatal injuries in the construction industry.
Authors: Michael Welton; David DeJoy; Maria Eugenia Castellanos; Mark Ebell; Ye Shen; Sara Robb Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2017-06-22
Authors: Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Tainya C Clarke; Evelyn P Davila; Lora E Fleming; David J Lee Journal: Environ Health Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Henrik Borsting Jacobsen; Alberto Caban-Martinez; Lynn C Onyebeke; Glorian Sorensen; Jack T Dennerlein; Silje Endresen Reme Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Henk F van der Molen; Prativa Basnet; Peter Lt Hoonakker; Marika M Lehtola; Jorma Lappalainen; Monique Hw Frings-Dresen; Roger Haslam; Jos H Verbeek Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-02-05
Authors: Mazin A Tuma; John R Acerra; Ayman El-Menyar; Hassan Al-Thani; Ammar Al-Hassani; John F Recicar; Wafaa Al Yazeedi; Kimball I Maull Journal: Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Date: 2013-01
Authors: Giuseppe Campo; Luca Cegolon; Diego De Merich; Ugo Fedeli; Mauro Pellicci; William C Heymann; Sofia Pavanello; Armando Guglielmi; Giuseppe Mastrangelo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 3.390