| Literature DB >> 21453548 |
Toshimi Sairenchi1, Yasuo Haruyama, Yumiko Ishikawa, Keiko Wada, Kazumoto Kimura, Takashi Muto.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ability to predict future onset of depression is required for primary prevention of depression. Many cross-sectional studies have reported a correlation between sense of coherence (SOC) and the presence of depressive symptoms. However, it is unclear whether SOC can predict future onset of depression. Therefore, whether measures to prevent onset of depression are needed in for persons with low SOC is uncertain. Thus, the aim of this cohort study was to determine whether SOC could predict onset of depression and to assess the need for measures to prevent onset of depression for persons with low SOC.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21453548 PMCID: PMC3078884 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Figure 1A detailed flow diagram of the study participants
Baseline characteristics of the 1854 Japanese workers in 2005
| Score for sense of coherence (range) | p for difference* | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Low (16-39) | High (40-64) | ||
| Number of participants | 954 | 900 | |
| Male, n (%) | 698 (73.2) | 697 (77.4) | 0.033 |
| Age, mean ± SD (years) | 34.7 ± 8.1 | 36.5 ± 8.9 | <0.0001 |
| Administrative post, n (%) | 357 (37.4) | 425 (47.2) | <0.0001 |
| Married, n (%) | 413 (43.3) | 503 (55.9) | <0.0001 |
| Working hours per day, mean ± SD | 9.3 ± 1.5 | 9.3 ± 1.4 | 0.503 |
*Tested by t-test for age and working hours per day, and by χ2 test for gender, administrative post, and married status.
Risk ratios for layoff for depression by score for sense of coherence in 1854 Japanese workers in 2005-2007
| Score for sense of coherence | No. of participants | Person-years | No. of layoffs for depression | Layoff rate per 1,000 person-years | Model 1* | Model 2† | Model 3‡ | Model 4§ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total sense of coherence | ||||||||
| Low | 954 | 1699.2 | 12 | 7.1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| High | 900 | 1645.1 | 2 | 1.2 | 0.17 (0.04-0.76) | 0.18 (0.04-0.79) | 0.18 (0.04-0.79) | 0.18 (0.04-0.81) |
| Meaningfulness | ||||||||
| Low | 873 | 1560.9 | 9 | 5.8 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| High | 981 | 1783.4 | 5 | 2.8 | 0.49 (0.17-1.47) | 0.51 (0.17-1.53) | 0.51 (0.17-1.52) | 0.54 (0.18-1.63) |
| Manageability | ||||||||
| Low | 868 | 1552.1 | 8 | 5.2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| High | 986 | 1792.2 | 6 | 3.3 | 0.64 (0.22-1.85) | 0.64 (0.22-1.85) | 0.65 (0.23-1.89) | 0.66 (0.23-1.91) |
| Comprehensibility | ||||||||
| Low | 1012 | 1804.5 | 11 | 6.1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| High | 842 | 1539.8 | 3 | 1.9 | 0.31 (0.09-1.10) | 0.32 (0.09-1.15) | 0.32 (0.09-1.14) | 0.32 (0.09-1.15) |
*Adjusted for gender. †Adjusted for gender and age. ‡Adjusted for gender and administrative post. §Adjusted for gender and married status.
Area under the curve for the sense of coherence and its subscales
| Subset of sense of coherence | Area under the curve | (95% CI) | p† | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total sense of coherence | 0.70 | 0.58 | - | 0.82 | 0.010 |
| Meaningfulness | 0.65 | 0.49 | - | 0.81 | 0.057 |
| Manageability | 0.65 | 0.50 | - | 0.80 | 0.053 |
| Comprehensibility | 0.70 | 0.57 | - | 0.82 | 0.011 |
*Under non-parametric assumption. †p for H0: area under the curve = 0.5.