Literature DB >> 21452083

Factors affecting curve flexibility in skeletally immature and mature idiopathic scoliosis.

Zi-Qiang Chen1, Yong-Fei Zhao, Yu-Shu Bai, Ka Po Gabriel Liu, Shi-Sheng He, Chuan-Feng Wang, Jing-Tao Zhang, Ming Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The determination of factors affecting curve flexibility is important in idiopathic scoliosis patients with regard to the Risser sign. The objective of this retrospective study was to identify factors affecting curve flexibility in patients with skeletally immature and mature idiopathic scoliosis.
METHODS: The records of all patients with idiopathic scoliosis who received surgical treatment from July 2001 to August 2008 at our hospital were screened. The Risser sign was used to separate the patients into a skeletally mature group (Risser grade = 5) and skeletally immature group (Risser grade < 5). Data recorded and compared were flexibility (%), bending angle (°), apical vertebral rotation (°), Cobb angle (°), curve location, prior use of brace treatment, and number of vertebrae in the curve.
RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 217 patients (34 males, 183 females) in the Risser grade < 5 group and 124 (21 males, 103 females) in the Risser grade = 5 group. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the Cobb angle and the curve location significantly affected curve flexibility in the Risser grade < 5 group, whereas in the Risser grade = 5 group, Cobb angle and age significantly affected flexibility.
CONCLUSIONS: Cobb angle and curve location influence main curve flexibility in skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and Cobb angle and age influence curve flexibility in skeletally mature adult scoliosis. Measurement of these values may aid in the evaluation of treatment options and preoperative planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21452083     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-011-0034-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  5 in total

Review 1.  Scoliosis and Prognosis-a systematic review regarding patient-specific and radiological predictive factors for curve progression.

Authors:  Maximilian Lenz; Stavros Oikonomidis; Arne Harland; Philipp Fürnstahl; Mazda Farshad; Jan Bredow; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The effect of scoliotic deformity on spine kinematics in adolescents.

Authors:  Sarah Galvis; Douglas Burton; Brandon Barnds; John Anderson; Richard Schwend; Nigel Price; Sara Wilson; Elizabeth Friis
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2016-10-25

3.  Comparison of trunk and spine deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Brandon B Carlson; Douglas C Burton; Marc A Asher
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2013-01-25

4.  Generalized Ligamentous Laxity; a Parameter Should not to be Forgotten in Preoperative Planning of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Ebrahim Ghayem-Hasankhani; Farzad Omidi-Kashani
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS.

Authors:  Ximing Xu; Fei Wang; Xiaoyi Zhou; Yajun Cheng; Xianzhao Wei; Yushu Bai; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.