Literature DB >> 21451271

Commentary: pitfalls in assessment of competency-based educational objectives.

Stephen J Lurie1, Christopher J Mooney, Jeffrey M Lyness.   

Abstract

Requirements for accreditation of medical professionals are increasingly cast in the language of general competencies. Because the language of these competencies is generally shaped by negotiations among stakeholders, however, it has proven difficult to attain consensus on precise definitions. This lack of clarity is amplified when attempting to measure these essentially political constructs in individual learners. The authors of this commentary frame these difficulties within modern views of test validity. The most significant obstacle to valid measurement is not necessarily a lack of useful tools but, rather, a general unwillingness to question whether the competencies themselves represent valid measurement constructs. Although competencies may prove useful in defining an overall social mission for organizations, such competencies should not be mistaken for measurable and distinct attributes that people can demonstrate in the context of their actual work. © by the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21451271     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820cdb28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  11 in total

1.  Teaching and Assessing Colorectal Surgery Residents in the Age of ACGME Competencies: Pieces of the Whole.

Authors:  Jan Rakinic
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-09

2.  Using a Curricular Vision to Define Entrustable Professional Activities for Medical Student Assessment.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Christy Boscardin; Tracy B Fulton; Catherine Lucey; Sandra Oza; Arianne Teherani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Humanism in global oncology curricula: an emerging priority.

Authors:  M Giuliani; M A Martimianakis; M Broadhurst; J Papadakos; R Fazelad; E Driessen; J Frambach
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  [Entrustable professional activities : Promising concept in postgraduate medical education].

Authors:  J Breckwoldt; S K Beckers; G Breuer; A Marty
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education.

Authors:  Jacob Pearce; Daniel Edwards; Julian Fraillon; Hamish Coates; Benedict J Canny; David Wilkinson
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

6.  Competency-Based Postgraduate Medical Education: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-15

7.  The power of subjectivity in competency-based assessment.

Authors:  A Virk; A Joshi; R Mahajan; T Singh
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.476

8.  Entrustability levels of general internal medicine residents.

Authors:  Mostafa Dehghani Poudeh; Aeen Mohammadi; Rita Mojtahedzadeh; Nikoo Yamani
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Essential facets of competence that enable trust in medical graduates: a ranking study among physician educators in two countries.

Authors:  Marjo Wijnen-Meijer; Marieke van der Schaaf; Kirstin Nillesen; Sigrid Harendza; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2013-11

10.  Narrative descriptions should replace grades and numerical ratings for clinical performance in medical education in the United States.

Authors:  Janice L Hanson; Adam A Rosenberg; J Lindsey Lane
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.