Literature DB >> 21451156

Playing fair: fairness beliefs and health policy preferences in the United States.

Julia Lynch1, Sarah E Gollust.   

Abstract

Conventional wisdom suggests that the best way to persuade Americans to support changes in health care policy is to appeal to their self-interest - particularly to concerns about their economic and health security. An alternative strategy, framing problems in the health care system to emphasize inequalities, could also, however, mobilize public support for policy change by activating underlying attitudes about the unfairness or injustice of these inequalities. In this article, we draw on original data from a nationally representative survey to describe Americans' beliefs about fairness in the health domain, including their perceptions of the fairness of particular inequalities in health and health care. We then assess the influence of these fairness considerations on opinions about the appropriate role of private actors versus government in providing health insurance. Respondents believe inequalities in access to and quality of health care are more unfair than unequal health outcomes. Even after taking into account self-interest considerations and the other usual suspects driving policy opinions, perceptions of the unfairness of inequalities in health care strongly influence respondents' preferences for government provision of health insurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21451156     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-2010-032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  11 in total

1.  Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing Experience.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Stacy W Gray; Deanna Alexis Carere; Barbara A Koenig; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Amy L McGUIRE; Richard R Sharp; Kayte Spector-Bagdady; N A Wang; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  US Mayors' and Health Commissioners' Opinions About Health Disparities in Their Cities.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Rosie Mae Henson; Amy Carroll-Scott; Jennifer Kolker; Rennie Joshi; Ana V Diez Roux
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Healthcare Systems in Comparative Perspective: Classification, Convergence, Institutions, Inequalities, and Five Missed Turns.

Authors:  Jason Beckfield; Sigrun Olafsdottir; Benjamin Sosnaud
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2013-05-17

4.  Population Health Science: Fulfilling the Mission of Public Health.

Authors:  Frederick J Zimmerman
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Linking Data on Constituent Health with Elected Officials' Opinions: Associations Between Urban Health Disparities and Mayoral Officials' Beliefs About Health Disparities in Their Cities.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Rennie Joshi; Félice Lê-Scherban; Rosie Mae Henson; Ana V Diez Roux
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Egalitarian health policy preference and its related factors in Korea: national representative sample survey.

Authors:  Eun-Whan Lee; Jae-Hyun Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Personal needs versus national needs: public attitudes regarding health care priorities at the personal and national levels.

Authors:  Giora Kaplan; Orna Baron-Epel
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2015-05-15

8.  Addressing health inequities in Ontario, Canada: what solutions do the public support?

Authors:  Maritt Kirst; Ketan Shankardass; Sonica Singhal; Aisha Lofters; Carles Muntaner; Carlos Quiñonez
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Drivers of differential views of health equity in the U.S.: is the U.S. ready to make progress? Results from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes.

Authors:  Vivian L Towe; Linnea Warren May; Wenjing Huang; Laurie T Martin; Katherine Carman; Carolyn E Miller; Anita Chandra
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Public opinion about the health care system in Armenia: findings from a cross-sectional telephone survey.

Authors:  Tsovinar Harutyunyan; Varduhi Hayrumyan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.