Literature DB >> 21450715

High-dimensional pharmacogenetic prediction of a continuous trait using machine learning techniques with application to warfarin dose prediction in African Americans.

Erdal Cosgun1, Nita A Limdi, Christine W Duarte.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: With complex traits and diseases having potential genetic contributions of thousands of genetic factors, and with current genotyping arrays consisting of millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), powerful high-dimensional statistical techniques are needed to comprehensively model the genetic variance. Machine learning techniques have many advantages including lack of parametric assumptions, and high power and flexibility.
RESULTS: We have applied three machine learning approaches: Random Forest Regression (RFR), Boosted Regression Tree (BRT) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) to the prediction of warfarin maintenance dose in a cohort of African Americans. We have developed a multi-step approach that selects SNPs, builds prediction models with different subsets of selected SNPs along with known associated genetic and environmental variables and tests the discovered models in a cross-validation framework. Preliminary results indicate that our modeling approach gives much higher accuracy than previous models for warfarin dose prediction. A model size of 200 SNPs (in addition to the known genetic and environmental variables) gives the best accuracy. The R(2) between the predicted and actual square root of warfarin dose in this model was on average 66.4% for RFR, 57.8% for SVR and 56.9% for BRT. Thus RFR had the best accuracy, but all three techniques achieved better performance than the current published R(2) of 43% in a sample of mixed ethnicity, and 27% in an African American sample. In summary, machine learning approaches for high-dimensional pharmacogenetic prediction, and for prediction of clinical continuous traits of interest, hold great promise and warrant further research.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21450715      PMCID: PMC3087957          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  31 in total

1.  Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning.

Authors:  Margaret A Shipp; Ken N Ross; Pablo Tamayo; Andrew P Weng; Jeffery L Kutok; Ricardo C T Aguiar; Michelle Gaasenbeek; Michael Angelo; Michael Reich; Geraldine S Pinkus; Tane S Ray; Margaret A Koval; Kim W Last; Andrew Norton; T Andrew Lister; Jill Mesirov; Donna S Neuberg; Eric S Lander; Jon C Aster; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Prediction of protein-protein interactions using random decision forest framework.

Authors:  Xue-Wen Chen; Mei Liu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Machine learning in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Silke Szymczak; Joanna M Biernacka; Heather J Cordell; Oscar González-Recio; Inke R König; Heping Zhang; Yan V Sun
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  VKORC1 polymorphisms, haplotypes and haplotype groups on warfarin dose among African-Americans and European-Americans.

Authors:  Nita A Limdi; T Mark Beasley; Michael R Crowley; Joyce A Goldstein; Mark J Rieder; David A Flockhart; Donna K Arnett; Ronald T Acton; Nianjun Liu
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  An application of Random Forests to a genome-wide association dataset: methodological considerations & new findings.

Authors:  Benjamin A Goldstein; Alan E Hubbard; Adele Cutler; Lisa F Barcellos
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  The largest prospective warfarin-treated cohort supports genetic forecasting.

Authors:  Mia Wadelius; Leslie Y Chen; Jonatan D Lindh; Niclas Eriksson; Mohammed J R Ghori; Suzannah Bumpstead; Lennart Holm; Ralph McGinnis; Anders Rane; Panos Deloukas
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Dosing algorithms to predict warfarin maintenance dose in Caucasians and African Americans.

Authors:  H Schelleman; J Chen; Z Chen; J Christie; C W Newcomb; C M Brensinger; M Price; A S Whitehead; C Kealey; C F Thorn; F F Samaha; S E Kimmel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  From disease association to risk assessment: an optimistic view from genome-wide association studies on type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Zhi Wei; Kai Wang; Hui-Qi Qu; Haitao Zhang; Jonathan Bradfield; Cecilia Kim; Edward Frackleton; Cuiping Hou; Joseph T Glessner; Rosetta Chiavacci; Charles Stanley; Dimitri Monos; Struan F A Grant; Constantin Polychronakos; Hakon Hakonarson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.

Authors:  Gerhard Moser; Bruce Tier; Ron E Crump; Mehar S Khatkar; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Risk estimation and risk prediction using machine-learning methods.

Authors:  Jochen Kruppa; Andreas Ziegler; Inke R König
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Pharmacogenomics of warfarin in populations of African descent.

Authors:  Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz; Mariana R Botton
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Precision dosing of warfarin: open questions and strategies.

Authors:  Xi Li; Dan Li; Ji-Chu Wu; Zhao-Qian Liu; Hong-Hao Zhou; Ji-Ye Yin
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.550

4.  Nonlinear Machine Learning in Warfarin Dose Prediction: Insights from Contemporary Modelling Studies.

Authors:  Fengying Zhang; Yan Liu; Weijie Ma; Shengming Zhao; Jin Chen; Zhichun Gu
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 5.  Computationally Driven Discovery in Coagulation.

Authors:  Kathryn G Link; Michael T Stobb; Dougald M Monroe; Aaron L Fogelson; Keith B Neeves; Suzanne S Sindi; Karin Leiderman
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 8.311

6.  Revisiting Warfarin Dosing Using Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Ashkan Sharabiani; Adam Bress; Elnaz Douzali; Houshang Darabi
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  SNPs selection using support vector regression and genetic algorithms in GWAS.

Authors:  Fabrízzio Condé de Oliveira; Carlos Cristiano Hasenclever Borges; Fernanda Nascimento Almeida; Fabyano Fonseca e Silva; Rui da Silva Verneque; Marcos Vinicius G B da Silva; Wagner Arbex
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Comparison of Nine Statistical Model Based Warfarin Pharmacogenetic Dosing Algorithms Using the Racially Diverse International Warfarin Pharmacogenetic Consortium Cohort Database.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Xi Li; Wei Zhang; Hong-Hao Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Influence of Feature Encoding and Choice of Classifier on Disease Risk Prediction in Genome-Wide Association Studies.

Authors:  Florian Mittag; Michael Römer; Andreas Zell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pathway analysis of genome-wide data improves warfarin dose prediction.

Authors:  Roxana Daneshjou; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Konrad J Karczewski; Hersh Sagreiya; Stephane Bourgeois; Katarzyna Drozda; James K Burmester; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Yusuke Nakamura; Michiaki Kubo; Matthew Tector; Nita A Limdi; Larisa H Cavallari; Minoli Perera; Julie A Johnson; Teri E Klein; Russ B Altman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.