Literature DB >> 2145055

Stimulant-conditioned locomotion is not affected by blockade of D1 and/or D2 dopamine receptors during conditioning.

M T Martin-Iverson1, D J McManus.   

Abstract

A series of experiments were conducted to investigate the role of dopamine (DA) D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in stimulant-conditioned locomotion in rats. Expt. 1 demonstrated that locomotion could be induced by a testing situation when that situation was previously paired with (+)-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, s.c.) or a D2 receptor selective agonist (PHNO, 15 or 30 micrograms/kg, s.c.), but not when the drug treatments were given 3 h after exposure to the situation. The selective D2 receptor antagonist, haloperidol (50 micrograms/kg, i.p.), and the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (20 micrograms/kg, s.c.), blocked amphetamine-induced locomotion during the pairing process, but failed to block amphetamine-conditioned locomotion as assessed during a drug-free test in Expt. 2. This was true when the antagonists were given separately or together. The results of Expts. 3 and 4 showed that doses of the D1 (20 micrograms/kg, s.c.) and D2 antagonist (250 micrograms/kg, i.p.) that blocked the unconditioned locomotor effects of PHNO failed to block its conditioned locomotion. It is concluded that neither D1 nor D2 DA receptors are essential for the development of stimulant-conditioned locomotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2145055     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91540-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  7 in total

1.  Conditioned effects of apomorphine are manifest in regional EEG of rats both in hippocampus and in striatum.

Authors:  W Kropf; K Kuschinsky
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 within nucleus accumbens shell modulates environment-elicited cocaine conditioning expression.

Authors:  Arlene Martínez-Rivera; Enrique Rodríguez-Borrero; María Matías-Alemán; Alexandra Montalvo-Acevedo; Kathleen Guerrero-Figuereo; Liz J Febo-Rodríguez; Amarilys Morales-Rivera; Carmen S Maldonado-Vlaar
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity does not result from a failure of rats to habituate to novelty.

Authors:  S H Ahmed; P Oberling; G Di Scala; G Sandner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Effects of nimodipine and/or haloperidol on the expression of conditioned locomotion and sensitization to cocaine in rats.

Authors:  M T Martin-Iverson; A R Reimer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Behavioral sensitization and tolerance to cocaine and the occupation of dopamine receptors by dopamine.

Authors:  M T Martin-Iverson; L Y Burger
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1995 Aug-Dec       Impact factor: 5.590

6.  Individual differences in sugar intake predict the locomotor response to acute and repeated amphetamine administration.

Authors:  T L Sills; F J Vaccarino
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Nimodipine and haloperidol attenuate behavioural sensitization to cocaine but only nimodipine blocks the establishment of conditioned locomotion induced by cocaine.

Authors:  A R Reimer; M T Martin-Iverson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.