BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A series of novel non-peptide corticotropin releasing factor type-1 receptor (CRF(1)) antagonists were found to display varying degrees of insurmountable and non-competitive behaviour in functional in vitro assays. We describe how we attempted to relate this behaviour to ligand receptor-binding kinetics in a quantitative manner and how this resulted in the development and implementation of an efficient pharmacological screening method based on principles described by Motulsky and Mahan. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A non-equilibrium binding kinetic assay was developed to determine the receptor binding kinetics of non-peptide CRF(1) antagonists. Nonlinear, mixed-effects modelling was used to obtain estimates of the compounds association and dissociation rates. We present an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) approach, whereby the time course of in vivo CRF(1) receptor binding of novel compounds can be predicted on the basis of in vitro assays. KEY RESULTS: The non-competitive antagonist behaviour appeared to be correlated to the CRF(1) receptor off-rate kinetics. The integrated PKPD model suggested that, at least in a qualitative manner, the in vitro assay can be used to triage and select compounds for further in vivo investigations. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study provides evidence for a link between ligand offset kinetics and insurmountable/non-competitive antagonism at the CRF(1) receptor. The exact molecular pharmacological nature of this association remains to be determined. In addition, we have developed a quantitative framework to study and integrate in vitro and in vivo receptor binding kinetic behaviour of CRF(1) receptor antagonists in an efficient manner in a drug discovery setting.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A series of novel non-peptide corticotropin releasing factor type-1 receptor (CRF(1)) antagonists were found to display varying degrees of insurmountable and non-competitive behaviour in functional in vitro assays. We describe how we attempted to relate this behaviour to ligand receptor-binding kinetics in a quantitative manner and how this resulted in the development and implementation of an efficient pharmacological screening method based on principles described by Motulsky and Mahan. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A non-equilibrium binding kinetic assay was developed to determine the receptor binding kinetics of non-peptide CRF(1) antagonists. Nonlinear, mixed-effects modelling was used to obtain estimates of the compounds association and dissociation rates. We present an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) approach, whereby the time course of in vivo CRF(1) receptor binding of novel compounds can be predicted on the basis of in vitro assays. KEY RESULTS: The non-competitive antagonist behaviour appeared to be correlated to the CRF(1) receptor off-rate kinetics. The integrated PKPD model suggested that, at least in a qualitative manner, the in vitro assay can be used to triage and select compounds for further in vivo investigations. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study provides evidence for a link between ligand offset kinetics and insurmountable/non-competitive antagonism at the CRF(1) receptor. The exact molecular pharmacological nature of this association remains to be determined. In addition, we have developed a quantitative framework to study and integrate in vitro and in vivo receptor binding kinetic behaviour of CRF(1) receptor antagonists in an efficient manner in a drug discovery setting.
Authors: Sam R J Hoare; Beth A Fleck; Raymond S Gross; Paul D Crowe; John P Williams; Dimitri E Grigoriadis Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Yu-Wen Li; Lawrence Fitzgerald; Harvey Wong; Snjezana Lelas; Ge Zhang; Mark D Lindner; Tanya Wallace; John McElroy; Nicholas J Lodge; Paul Gilligan; Robert Zaczek Journal: CNS Drug Rev Date: 2005
Authors: Siobhan Malany; Lisa M Hernandez; William F Smith; Paul D Crowe; Sam R J Hoare Journal: J Recept Signal Transduct Res Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.092
Authors: Jeffrey S Stehouwer; Matthew S Birnbaum; Ronald J Voll; Michael J Owens; Susan J Plott; Chase H Bourke; Michael A Wassef; Clinton D Kilts; Mark M Goodman Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Nicholas J Lodge; Yu-Wen Li; Frederick T Chin; Douglas D Dischino; Sami S Zoghbi; Jeffrey A Deskus; Ronald J Mattson; Masao Imaizumi; Rick Pieschl; Thaddeus F Molski; Masahiro Fujita; Heidi Dulac; Robert Zaczek; Joanne J Bronson; John E Macor; Robert B Innis; Victor W Pike Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: John R Lever; Dennis K Miller; Emily A Fergason-Cantrell; Caroline L Green; Lisa D Watkinson; Terry L Carmack; Susan Z Lever Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Jeffrey S Stehouwer; Chase H Bourke; Michael J Owens; Ronald J Voll; Clinton D Kilts; Mark M Goodman Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 2.823