BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: According to the two-domain model for the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF(1)), peptide antagonists bind to the N-terminal domain (N-domain), non-peptide antagonists to the transmembrane region (J-domain), whereas peptide agonists attach to both the N- and J-domain of the receptor to express activity. The aim of this study was to search for possible differences in the antagonism of the Gs- and Gi-protein coupling of CRF(1) by a peptide (alpha-helical CRF(9-41)) and non-peptide antagonist (antalarmin), to determine whether the conformational requirements of the activated CRF(1) states for Gs and Gi coupling are similar or different. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We studied the inhibitory effect of alpha-helical CRF(9-41) and antalarmin on the coupling of CRF(1) to Gs- and Gi-protein in human embryonic kidney cells, using the [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding stimulation assay. KEY RESULTS: The non-peptide antagonized the receptor coupling to Gs competitively but that to Gi noncompetitively, and its antagonistic potency was different for urocortin- and sauvagine-evoked G-protein activation. In contrast, the peptide antagonist exhibited uniformly competitive antagonism. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The results allow us to extend the two-domain model of CRF(1) activation by assuming that CRF(1) agonists activate the receptor by binding to at least two ensembles of J-domain configurations which couple to Gs or Gi, that are in turn antagonized by a non-peptide antagonist competitively and allosterically, respectively. It is further concluded that the allosteric mechanism of non-peptide antagonism is not valid for the Gs-mediated physiological activities of CRF(1).
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: According to the two-domain model for the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF(1)), peptide antagonists bind to the N-terminal domain (N-domain), non-peptide antagonists to the transmembrane region (J-domain), whereas peptide agonists attach to both the N- and J-domain of the receptor to express activity. The aim of this study was to search for possible differences in the antagonism of the Gs- and Gi-protein coupling of CRF(1) by a peptide (alpha-helical CRF(9-41)) and non-peptide antagonist (antalarmin), to determine whether the conformational requirements of the activated CRF(1) states for Gs and Gi coupling are similar or different. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We studied the inhibitory effect of alpha-helical CRF(9-41) and antalarmin on the coupling of CRF(1) to Gs- and Gi-protein in humanembryonic kidney cells, using the [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding stimulation assay. KEY RESULTS: The non-peptide antagonized the receptor coupling to Gs competitively but that to Gi noncompetitively, and its antagonistic potency was different for urocortin- and sauvagine-evoked G-protein activation. In contrast, the peptide antagonist exhibited uniformly competitive antagonism. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The results allow us to extend the two-domain model of CRF(1) activation by assuming that CRF(1) agonists activate the receptor by binding to at least two ensembles of J-domain configurations which couple to Gs or Gi, that are in turn antagonized by a non-peptide antagonist competitively and allosterically, respectively. It is further concluded that the allosteric mechanism of non-peptide antagonism is not valid for the Gs-mediated physiological activities of CRF(1).
Authors: E M Fekete; Y Zhao; A Szücs; V Sabino; P Cottone; J Rivier; W W Vale; G F Koob; E P Zorrilla Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: M Beyermann; N Heinrich; K Fechner; J Furkert; W Zhang; O Kraetke; M Bienert; H Berger Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2007-05-29 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Isabella Garcia; Kathleen B Quast; Longwen Huang; Alexander M Herman; Jennifer Selever; Jan M Deussing; Nicholas J Justice; Benjamin R Arenkiel Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: D Wootten; H Lindmark; M Kadmiel; H Willcockson; K M Caron; J Barwell; T Drmota; D R Poyner Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 8.739