Literature DB >> 2144914

Effect of training frequency and specificity on isometric lumbar extension strength.

J E Graves1, M L Pollock, D Foster, S H Leggett, D M Carpenter, R Vuoso, A Jones.   

Abstract

To investigate the effects of training frequency and specificity of training on isolated lumbar extension strength, 72 men (age = 31 +/- 9 years) and 42 women (age = 28 +/- 9 years) were tested before and after 12 weeks of training. Each test involved the measurement of maximum voluntary isometric torque at 72 degrees, 60 degrees, 48 degrees, 36 degrees, 24 degrees, 12 degrees, and 0 degrees of lumbar flexion. After the pretraining tests, subjects were randomly stratified to groups that trained with variable resistance dynamic exercise every other week (1X/2 weeks, n = 19), once per week (1X/week, n = 22), twice per week (2X/week, n = 23) or three times per week (3X/week, n = 21); a group that trained isometrically once per week (n = 14); or a control group that did not train (n = 15). Analysis of covariance showed that all training groups improved their ability to generate isometric torque at each angle measured when compared with controls (P less than 0.05). There was no statistical difference in adjusted posttraining isometric torques among the groups that trained (P greater than 0.05), but dynamic training weight increased to a lesser extent (P less than 0.08) for the 1X/2 weeks group (26.6%) than for the groups that trained 1X/week, 2X/week, and 3X/week (37.2 to 41.4%). These data indicate that a training frequency as low as 1X/week provides an effective training stimulus for the development of lumbar extension strength. Improvements in strength noted after isometric training suggest that isometric exercise provides an effective alternative for developing lumbar strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2144914     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199006000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  22 in total

Review 1.  Exercise prescription for the elderly: current recommendations.

Authors:  R S Mazzeo; H Tanaka
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Movement velocity in resistance training.

Authors:  Marta I R Pereira; Paulo S C Gomes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Early return to work following an aggressive rehabilitation program initiated one day after spine surgery.

Authors:  P O Sjolinder; D F Nota
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1994-12

Review 4.  Applied physiology of water-skiing.

Authors:  S H Leggett; K Kenney; T Eberhardt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Safety and efficacy of supervised strength training adopted in pregnancy.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Connor; Melanie S Poudevigne; M Elaine Cress; Robert W Motl; James F Clapp
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2011-03

6.  Comparison of once-weekly and twice-weekly strength training in older adults.

Authors:  J DiFrancisco-Donoghue; W Werner; P C Douris
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Long-term effects of an outpatient rehabilitation program in patients with chronic recurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Karin Pieber; Malvina Herceg; Michael Quittan; Robert Csapo; Rudolf Müller; Guenther F Wiesinger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Prescription of resistance training for healthy populations.

Authors:  C J Hass; M S Feigenbaum; B A Franklin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  The effect of workplace based strengthening on low back injury rates: A case study in the strip mining industry.

Authors:  V Mooney; M Kron; P Rummerfield; B Holmes
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-09

10.  Isolated Lumbar Extension Resistance Training Improves Strength, Pain, and Disability, but Not Spinal Height or Shrinkage ("Creep") in Participants with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  James Steele; Stewart Bruce-Low; Dave Smith; David Jessop; Neil Osborne
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.