Intact synaptic function and plasticity are fundamental prerequisites to a healthy brain. Therefore, synaptic proteins are one of the major targets for drugs used as neuro-chemical therapeutics. Unfortunately, the majority of drugs is not able to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and is therefore distributed within the CNS parenchyma. Here, we report the development of novel biodegradable Nanoparticles (NPs), made of poly-lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) conjugated with glycopeptides that are able to cross the BBB and deliver for example Zn(2+) ions. We also provide a thorough characterization of loaded and unloaded NPs for their stability, cellular uptake, release properties, toxicity, and impact on cell trafficking. Our data reveal that these NPs are biocompatible, and can be used to elevate intracellular levels of Zn(2+). Importantly, by engineering the surface of NPs with antibodies against NCAM1 and CD44, we were able to selectively target neurons or glial cells, respectively. Our results indicate that these biodegradable NPs provide a potential new venue for the delivery Zn(2+) to the CNS and thus a means to explore the influence of altered zinc levels linked to neuropsychological disorders such as depression.
Intact synaptic function and plasticity are fundamental prerequisites to a healthy brain. Therefore, synaptic proteins are one of the major targets for drugs used as neuro-chemical therapeutics. Unfortunately, the majority of drugs is not able to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and is therefore distributed within the CNS parenchyma. Here, we report the development of novel biodegradable Nanoparticles (NPs), made of poly-lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) conjugated with glycopeptides that are able to cross the BBB and deliver for example Zn(2+) ions. We also provide a thorough characterization of loaded and unloaded NPs for their stability, cellular uptake, release properties, toxicity, and impact on cell trafficking. Our data reveal that these NPs are biocompatible, and can be used to elevate intracellular levels of Zn(2+). Importantly, by engineering the surface of NPs with antibodies against NCAM1 and CD44, we were able to selectively target neurons or glial cells, respectively. Our results indicate that these biodegradable NPs provide a potential new venue for the delivery Zn(2+) to the CNS and thus a means to explore the influence of altered zinc levels linked to neuropsychological disorders such as depression.
The majority of drugs used as neuro-chemical therapeutics target synaptic proteins.
Unfortunately, a high number of drugs are not able to cross through the
blood–brain barrier (BBB) [1]. The transmissivity of this epithelial structure is
restricted by the presence of tight junctions (TJ) that connect the cerebral
endothelial and epithelial cells of the choroids plexus. Additionally, glial cells
are found surrounding the surface of the capillaries, which cohere the endothelial
cells, producing an electrical resistance much higher than that of other systemic
endothelia [2].
Recent studies have demonstrated a non-invasive method of drug delivery to the CNS,
based on the use of biodegradable Nanoparticles (NPs). Injectable nanoparticulate
drug carriers made of poly-lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA), and specifically modified
with ligands were shown to be able to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB),
thus representing an important potential tool for treatment of neurological diseases
[3], [4].In particular, this new strategy for NPs-brain targeting is based on the surface
engineering of NPs, using a glycopeptides (g7)–derived PLGA [3], [5], [6]. The attachment of
ligands for CNS targeting and/or fluorescent markers on the surface of NPs allows
evaluating and influencing their properties both in vitro and
in vivo. These engineered NPs (BBB-NPs) bear the possibility to
deliver different kinds of drugs to the brain with a high rate of efficiency
(13–15% of the injected dose) [7]. Thus, by encapsulation of
drugs into BBB-NPs a significant improvement of brain delivery can be expected.In recent years, there has been mounting evidence that suggests a correlation between
zinc deficiency and clinical depression [8], [9]. Clinical studies as well as work
with animal models indicate that zinc levels and some neuropsychological disorders
are functionally linked. Zinc deficiency, for example, has been shown to induce
depression- and anxiety-like behaviors, while zinc supplementation has been used to
treat depression. Intriguingly, zinc administration improves the efficacy of
antidepressant drugs in depressedpatients [10] and the level of zinc at
synapses in the hippocampus [11]. Thus, while zinc deficiency may have a critical role in
the development of mood disorders and may serve as a putative model of depression in
mice, zinc supplementation may be important in the treatment of these disorders
[12].Given the therapeutic potential of NPs, in the present study, we have investigated
whether un-modified PLGA NPs (P-NPs) or BBB-NPs specifically targeted to neurons or
glia cells could be used to encapsulate and deliver Zn2+ into cells.
Our data demonstrate that this strategy is feasible creating a novel platform not
only for understanding the role of zinc in neuronal function, but also the delivery
of drugs into the CNS and ultimately the treatment of neurological diseases.
Results
NPs do not affect cell viability or neuronal morphogenesis
Although in previous studies, NPs have been shown to cross the BBB, whether they
are actively taken up by neurons and/or adversely affect cell viability is
poorly investigated. To explore these possibilities, we examined the effect of
adding NPs to dissociated neuronal/glial cultures. In an initial set of
experiments designed to assess their affect on cell viability, cultures were
treated with one of four preparations [unloaded P-NPs, unloaded BBB-NPs,
Zn2+ loaded P-NPs (Zn-P-NPs) or Zn2+ loaded
BBB-NPs (Zn-BBB-NPs)] starting at DIV7 (625 µg NPs per ml) (Fig. 1A) and compared to
untreated control cells at DIV14.
Figure 1
Cell viability after treatment with NPs.
A) Mixed neuronal cultures containing glia cells and hippocampal neurons
were plated and grown until DIV14. Cells were treated with the following
NPs: “P-NPs” (empty NPs without ligand),
“BBB-NPs” (un-loaded g7 ligand coated NPs),
“Zn-P-NPs” (NPs encapsulating Zn2+) or
“Zn-BBB-NPs” (g7 ligand coated NPs encapsulating
Zn2+) (all: 625 µg NPs per ml), at DIV7. Upper
panel: cells were stained with antibodies against the dendritic
microtubule associated protein MAP2 and DAPI. The number of neurons
(MAP2 positive cells) and the overall cell number (DAPI staining) per
optic field was measured. Neither P-NPs nor BBB-NPs affected cell number
as quantified in the lower panel. A small but significant reduction in
cell number was observed in Zn-NPs (neurons) and Zn-BBB-NPs treated
cells. B) Neuronal/glial cultures were plated at 20,000 cells per
coverslip and treated for 7 days with different concentrations of P-NPs
and BBB-NPs (e.g. multiples of 625 µg NPs per ml applied to
control cells (Ctrl)). The cells were treated at 7DIV fixed at DIV14 and
labeling for MAP2 and nuclei (DAPI) was performed. Lower panel:
quantification of DAPI positive cells/optical field of view (40×
mag). Only healthy nuclei were counted. At 10× 625 µg/ml
(6.25 mg/ml), there is a significant reduction in cell number of cells
treated with P-NPs. Cell-number reduction with BBB-NPs treated cells is
seen at 8× 625 µg/ml (5 mg NP/ml). Arrows indicate neurons
that underwent cell death.
Cell viability after treatment with NPs.
A) Mixed neuronal cultures containing glia cells and hippocampal neurons
were plated and grown until DIV14. Cells were treated with the following
NPs: “P-NPs” (empty NPs without ligand),
“BBB-NPs” (un-loaded g7 ligand coated NPs),
“Zn-P-NPs” (NPs encapsulating Zn2+) or
“Zn-BBB-NPs” (g7 ligand coated NPs encapsulating
Zn2+) (all: 625 µg NPs per ml), at DIV7. Upper
panel: cells were stained with antibodies against the dendritic
microtubule associated proteinMAP2 and DAPI. The number of neurons
(MAP2 positive cells) and the overall cell number (DAPI staining) per
optic field was measured. Neither P-NPs nor BBB-NPs affected cell number
as quantified in the lower panel. A small but significant reduction in
cell number was observed in Zn-NPs (neurons) and Zn-BBB-NPs treated
cells. B) Neuronal/glial cultures were plated at 20,000 cells per
coverslip and treated for 7 days with different concentrations of P-NPs
and BBB-NPs (e.g. multiples of 625 µg NPs per ml applied to
control cells (Ctrl)). The cells were treated at 7DIV fixed at DIV14 and
labeling for MAP2 and nuclei (DAPI) was performed. Lower panel:
quantification of DAPI positive cells/optical field of view (40×
mag). Only healthy nuclei were counted. At 10× 625 µg/ml
(6.25 mg/ml), there is a significant reduction in cell number of cells
treated with P-NPs. Cell-number reduction with BBB-NPs treated cells is
seen at 8× 625 µg/ml (5 mg NP/ml). Arrows indicate neurons
that underwent cell death.Cells treated with unloaded P-NPs and BBB-NPs exhibited no difference in their
morphology, e.g. dendrite branching measured by determining the “dendritic
complexity index” DCI [13] or the number of synapses per unit length of
dendrites (Fig.
S1). The findings also allow to dismiss the possibility of a possible
toxic effect of glycopeptides covering NPs surface (BBB-NPs) since there is no
significant difference between viability-results with empty P-NPs and empty
BBB-NPs. Furthermore, the number of neurons assessed by anti-MAP2 staining as
well as overall cell number per field of view including glial cells assessed by
DAPI staining was not changed compared to control cells. Cells treated with NPs
containing Zn2+ (Zn-P-NPs and Zn-BBB-NPs) show a slight but
significant reduction in glial and/or neuronal cell number following the
addition of Zn-BBB-NPs or Zn-P-NPs, respectively. Since cells treated with empty
P-NPs do not show this decrease in neurons, the effect is likely due to an
increase in intracellular zinc levels and not by the treatment with NPs itself.
The intracellular zinc concentration might have reached already toxic levels for
neurons but not for glial cells (Zn-P-NPs) or both, neurons and glial cells
(Zn-BBB-NPs) due to increased cellular uptake of Zn-BBB-NPs (Fig. 1A).To further investigate the influence of NPs on cell viability, cells were plated
with a density of 20,000 cells per coverslip and treated with different NP
concentrations of “P-NPs” and “BBB-NPs”, i.e. Ctrl (625
µg NPs per ml), 2×, 4×, etc. compared to the concentration
used in the first cell viability experiment (Fig. 1B). The cells were fixed at DIV14 and
the number of cells was assessed. Beginning with the 6× concentration, the
standard-deviation becomes larger, meaning that there were already some optic
fields per/coverslip, where cell viability was reduced while in other regions
cells remained healthy. However, at 8× (“BBB-NPs”) and
10× (“P-NPs” and “BBB-NPs”) concentrations of NPs,
there is a significant reduction in cell number in all fields of view.
Neurons and glial cells endocytose nanoparticles
To explore the fate of NPs added to our neuronal/glial cultures, we took
advantage of the fluorescent labeling of both unloaded P-NPs and BBB-NPs (by
using tetra-methyl rhodamine conjugated PLGA in the formulation of the NPs). The
results reveal that unloaded P-NPs and BBB-NPs readily associated with cultured
cells (Fig. 2A).
Interestingly, BBB-NPs were found associated to cells in higher amount compared
to P-NPs (Fig 2A), perhaps
due to the presence of the glycopeptides coating on the surface of BBB-NPs. To
investigate whether cells take up NPs, we used Zn2+ loaded NPs
and Zinpyr-1, a zinc staining fluorophore, to visualize intracellular zinc-ions.
Interestingly, in contrast to untreated as well as ZnCl2 supplemented
cells (data not shown), bright fluorescent vesicular structures were visible in
HEK293 cells and hippocampal neurons (Fig. 2B, arrows and Fig. S2A)
after supplementation of the growth medium with Zn2+ loaded
Zn-P-NPs or Zn-BBB-NPs (data not shown). Monitoring the distribution of the
rhodamine-conjugated PLGA, we observed a strong colocalization with Zinpyr-1
fluorescent puncta. These data are consistent with the internalization of NPs
into Zn2+ rich intracellular organelles/vesicles (Fig. 2C). This conclusion is
furthermore consistent with the selective co-localization of the zinc signal
with fluorescently tagged Zn-BBB-NPs treated cells (Fig. 2C, full arrows) but not cells treated
with unloaded BBB-NPs (Fig.
2C, empty arrows).
Figure 2
Subcellular localization of NPs in HEK293 cells and neurons.
A) Images of hippocampal cultures treated with NPs (left panel).
Nanoparticles without ligand (P-NPs) or coated with BBB-ligand (BBB-NPs)
associate with cells. The distribution pattern is consistent with NPs
both on the surface and within cells. Quantification of Rhodamine
fluorescent signals per cells shows a ratio of BBB-NPs to P-NPs of 3.15
(n = 10) (right panel). B) Changes in the
intracellular zinc levels of HEK293 (upper panel) and neuronal (lower
panel) cells after addition Zn-P-NPs were detected by loading cells with
Zinypr-1. Bright fluorescent vesicular structures were visible (arrows)
in HEK293 cells as well as hippocampal neurons after application of
Zn-P-NPs compared to untreated (control) cells. The bottom row of images
in each panel shows heat maps revealing regional differences in zinc
levels. C) Fluorescent images of HEK293 (upper panels) or neurons (lower
panel) assessing the relative distribution of NPs and zinc. Zinypr-1 was
used to detect Zn2+, and Rhodamine fluorescence to
detect the distribution of Rhodamine labeled NPs. The zinc-signal
colocalizes with fluorescent NPs in Zn-BBB-NPs treated cells (HEK293:
middle panel, full arrows and Neurons: lower panel) but not in unloaded
BBB-NPs (empty arrows, upper panel). D) Fluorescent images of glial
cells (upper panel) and hippocampal neurons (lower panel) treated with
Rhodamine-conjugated BBB-NPs and FM1-34FX. BBB-NPs fluorescence is
observed colocalizing with FM1-43 FX within endocytotic vesicles
(arrows). E) Fluorescent P-NPs can - similar to BBB-NPs - be found
inside the cell soma co-localizing with FM 1-43 FX within endocytotic
vesicles. Quantitative analysis of the percent of vesicles colabeled
with NPs and FM dye in comparison to the total pool of FM-labeled
vesicles reveals that no significant differences between P-NPs and
BBB-NPs can be measured. However, the total number of FM/NP vesicles is
significantly increased in BBB-NP treated cells vs. P-NP treated
cells.
Subcellular localization of NPs in HEK293 cells and neurons.
A) Images of hippocampal cultures treated with NPs (left panel).
Nanoparticles without ligand (P-NPs) or coated with BBB-ligand (BBB-NPs)
associate with cells. The distribution pattern is consistent with NPs
both on the surface and within cells. Quantification of Rhodamine
fluorescent signals per cells shows a ratio of BBB-NPs to P-NPs of 3.15
(n = 10) (right panel). B) Changes in the
intracellular zinc levels of HEK293 (upper panel) and neuronal (lower
panel) cells after addition Zn-P-NPs were detected by loading cells with
Zinypr-1. Bright fluorescent vesicular structures were visible (arrows)
in HEK293 cells as well as hippocampal neurons after application of
Zn-P-NPs compared to untreated (control) cells. The bottom row of images
in each panel shows heat maps revealing regional differences in zinc
levels. C) Fluorescent images of HEK293 (upper panels) or neurons (lower
panel) assessing the relative distribution of NPs and zinc. Zinypr-1 was
used to detect Zn2+, and Rhodamine fluorescence to
detect the distribution of Rhodamine labeled NPs. The zinc-signal
colocalizes with fluorescent NPs in Zn-BBB-NPs treated cells (HEK293:
middle panel, full arrows and Neurons: lower panel) but not in unloaded
BBB-NPs (empty arrows, upper panel). D) Fluorescent images of glial
cells (upper panel) and hippocampal neurons (lower panel) treated with
Rhodamine-conjugated BBB-NPs and FM1-34FX. BBB-NPs fluorescence is
observed colocalizing with FM1-43 FX within endocytotic vesicles
(arrows). E) Fluorescent P-NPs can - similar to BBB-NPs - be found
inside the cell soma co-localizing with FM 1-43 FX within endocytotic
vesicles. Quantitative analysis of the percent of vesicles colabeled
with NPs and FM dye in comparison to the total pool of FM-labeled
vesicles reveals that no significant differences between P-NPs and
BBB-NPs can be measured. However, the total number of FM/NP vesicles is
significantly increased in BBB-NP treated cells vs. P-NP treated
cells.In order to study the mechanism of entrance and the localization of BBB-NPs
within cells, we used fluorescent BBB-NPs together with FM1-43FX dye (Fig. 2D). FM1-43FX is a
fixable membrane probe widely used for monitoring recycling vesicles [14]. In these
experiments, fluorescently labeled BBB-NPs (Fig. 2D) and P-NPs (Fig. 2E) were found to decorate the same
vesicular structures labeled with FM1-43FX consistent with the model of NPs
entering cells by endocytosis (Fig.
2A,D,E). Analysis of the amount of vesicles harboring NPs compared to
the total pool of labeled vesicles shows that no differences between P-NPs and
BBB-NPs can be seen. However, the total number of FM1-43FX+NP positive
vesicles was significantly increased in BBB-NP treated cells (Fig. 2E). These findings
suggest that the PLGA coating might enhance endocytosis of NPs. Additionally, we
monitored the fluorescent pattern of BBB-NPs treated cells over a time-course of
7 d. This revealed that the initial punctate pattern becomes more diffuse over
time, consistent with the slow degradation of BBB-NPs resulting in cells with
higher background fluorescence (Fig. S2B).Taken together, these data indicate that BBB-NPs have the capacity to release
their content intracellularly.
Characterization of Zn2+ loaded NPs
As a biodegradable polymer, NPs are predicted to slowly release their content
over time. We were thus keen to characterize the rate of zinc release both
in vitro and in vivo. For all studies
outlined below, batches of NPs were characterized for their size, surface charge
and general shape by means of Photon Correlation Spectroscopy (PCS) methods and
SEM analysis. All NPs (independently from the surface modifiers or the loading)
show an average size of 190–210 nm, with overall surface charge (expressed
as zeta-potential, z-p) close to neutrality (z-p ranging from −0.5 to
−10 mV). This value was maintained also after re-suspension of all kinds
of lyophilized NPs. Moreover, a study on the content and release in 7.4 pH
buffer was performed on Zn2+-loaded P-NPs (Zn-P-NPs) and BBB-NPs
(Zn-BBB-NPs) evidencing a mean of 2.6 mg of Zn2+ (detected both
by colorimetric and atomic absorbance technologies) per 100 mg of NPs. Moreover,
surface analysis (i.e. ESCA analysis) of the antibody-engineered NPs
(Anti-NCAM1-NPs and Anti-CD44-NPs) demonstrated the efficacy of the surface
modification process.
Characterization of the in vitro release of Zinc from
NPs
ZnSO4. 7H2O was encapsulated in both P-NPs and BBB-NPs
(mean size close to 200 nm, PDI of 0.204 and a z-p of −6.13 mV) with a
final content of 2.6 mg of Zn2+-ions per 100 mg of NPs. Both NP
samples showed similar features (with respect to loading and chemico-physical
properties). To assess the timescale, in which Zn-P-NPs and Zn-BBB-NPs release
Zn2+
in vitro, both types of Zn-loaded NPs were suspended in
Neurobasal Medium +Glutamine +B27 (NB++). A 1.5 µM
basic Zn2+ concentration of NB++ was measured using
plasma mass-spectrometry.A suspension with an amount of Zn-loaded NPs (Zn-P-NPs and Zn-BBB-NPs) approx.
encapsulating 1 mM Zn2+ was prepared, added to the medium and
incubated for 28 days at 37°C. Each day, the zinc concentration was measured
using Zinpyr-1,
(C46H36Cl2N6O5) a
fluorescent sensor for Zn2+ with a high specificity and affinity
for Zn2+ (Kd = 0.7±0.1
nM) (Fig. 3). Since Zinpyr-1
is not able to enter or to be adsorbed by NPs, the rise in fluorescence is due
to NP-Zn2+ release, a value that correlates directly. After 28
days, TPEN (N,N,N′,N′-Tetrakis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine) was
added to the samples. TPEN is a water-soluble and cell membrane permeable zinc
chelator with very high affinity for Zn2+ (Kd for
Zn2+ binding to TPEN is 6.3 * 10−16 M
at pH 7.6). A drop in fluorescence shows that the fluorescence of Zinpyr-1
indeed was due to the presence of Zn2+ in the medium. Since
Zinpyr-1 only fluoresces upon binding Zn2+, the loss of
Zn2+ due to chelation causes this drop in fluorescence.
Figure 3
NPs release Zn2+ over time.
Quantification of the rate of zinc released from NPs in vitro by
monitoring free zinc levels with Zinypr-1 fluorescence. The blue line
indicates the trend-line for the obtained data-points. The green line
shows an overall drop of fluorescence after treatment with TPEN that
competitively binds free zinc with higher affinity. The fluorescence
intensity of Zinpyr-1 was measured every 24 hrs and correlated to the
fluorescence of medium with known zinc concentration.
NPs release Zn2+ over time.
Quantification of the rate of zinc released from NPs in vitro by
monitoring free zinc levels with Zinypr-1 fluorescence. The blue line
indicates the trend-line for the obtained data-points. The green line
shows an overall drop of fluorescence after treatment with TPEN that
competitively binds free zinc with higher affinity. The fluorescence
intensity of Zinpyr-1 was measured every 24 hrs and correlated to the
fluorescence of medium with known zinc concentration.The results of the release of Zn2+ suggest that Zn-P-NPs and
Zn-BBB-NPs degrade over time, producing a sustained release: in particular,
during the first 16 days, a slightly faster release of Zn2+ is
visible compared to day 16–22, while, after 22 days, nearly all
Zn2+ is released (Fig. 3). The release profile could be due to
a degradation/diffusion process happening on NPs architecture. Since the release
of Zn2+ from both types of NPs is almost the same, we chose to
show only the release of Zn-P-NPs, in order to avoid overlapping and redundancy
of results.
Release of Zinc from NP in cultured cells
To assess whether an intracellular environment alters the time release properties
of NPs, we monitored changes in intracellular Zn2+ in HEK293
cells and Hippocampal neurons treated with NPs loaded with Zn2+
(Zn-P-NPs and Zn-BBB-NPs). As above, the Zinpyr-1 fluorescent probe was loaded
into cells by its addition to the culture medium. Zinpyr-1 is able to penetrate
cell membranes.In initial experiments, we examined the rate of intracellular
NPs-Zn2+ release in HEK293 cells, a wildly used fibroblast
cell line that shares many properties of immature neurons [11]. Here, HEK293 cells were
incubated with a 30 µM ZnCl2 solution and a suspension of
Zn-P-NPs and Zn-BBB-NPs (End concentration: 1 mM Zn2+ after NP
degradation in DMEM) (Fig.
4A,B). A final zinc concentration was calculated using grey values of
Zinpyr-1 fluorescence correlating to the local zinc concentration. The
background fluorescence of untreated HEK293 cells was subtracted and cells
treated only with 30 µM ZnCl2 used as reference (Fig. S4).
After 3 days, a final zinc concentration of 180 µM released by Zn-BBB-NPs
was reached (Fig. 4A,B).
Compared to the expected Zn2+ release-curve (Fig. 3), this concentration
should have been reached only after 6–7 days. Thus, compared to in
vitro release of Zn2+ from NPs, the release appears
to occur faster in cells. This might be due to a faster degradation of
intracellular NPs. In line with this, Zn-BBB-NPs that show increased cellular
uptake compared to Zn-P-NPs also lead to a significantly higher increase of the
intracellular zinc concentration after 1 d. Not unexpectedly, after 3 days,
HEK293 cells showed signs of distress and underwent cell death. This is
consistent with published literature showing that an intracellular free zinc
concentration of this magnitude is cyto-toxic [15], [16] (and Fig S3).
Figure 4
Intracellular Zn2+ increase over time.
A) Changes in intracellular zinc levels of HEK293 cells incubated with
Zn-P-NPs or Zn-BBB-NPs for 1–3 days (End concentration: 1 mM after
complete degradation) monitored by Zinypr-1 fluorescence (upper row).
Color-coding of Zinpyr-1 fluorescence (lower row) reveals changes in the
intracellular zinc concentration. B) Quantification intracellular zinc
with Zinypr-1 (for control and ZnCl2 reference see Fig
S4.). Zinc levels in cells treated with Zn-BBB-NPs (41
µM) are significantly higher after one day compared to cells
treated with Zn-P-NPs (22 µM). After 3 days, a final zinc
concentration of 160 µM (Zn-P-NPs) and 180 µM (Zn-BBB-NPs)
was reached. C) Hippocampal neurons were incubated with Zn-P-NPs and
Zn-BBB-NPs at 6DIV and zinc levels determined by monitoring changes in
Zinpyr-1 fluorescence (upper row and lower row heat-maps) at 7DIV and
14DIV (End concentration: 250 µM after complete degradation). D)
After one day, Zn-P-NPs (7 µM) show a significantly lower level of
intracellular zinc compared to Zn-BBB-NPs treated cells (10 µM).
After 8 days, a final zinc concentration of 48 µM (Zn-P-NPs) and
55 µM (Zn-BBB-NPs) was reached.
Intracellular Zn2+ increase over time.
A) Changes in intracellular zinc levels of HEK293 cells incubated with
Zn-P-NPs or Zn-BBB-NPs for 1–3 days (End concentration: 1 mM after
complete degradation) monitored by Zinypr-1 fluorescence (upper row).
Color-coding of Zinpyr-1 fluorescence (lower row) reveals changes in the
intracellular zinc concentration. B) Quantification intracellular zinc
with Zinypr-1 (for control and ZnCl2 reference see Fig
S4.). Zinc levels in cells treated with Zn-BBB-NPs (41
µM) are significantly higher after one day compared to cells
treated with Zn-P-NPs (22 µM). After 3 days, a final zinc
concentration of 160 µM (Zn-P-NPs) and 180 µM (Zn-BBB-NPs)
was reached. C) Hippocampal neurons were incubated with Zn-P-NPs and
Zn-BBB-NPs at 6DIV and zinc levels determined by monitoring changes in
Zinpyr-1 fluorescence (upper row and lower row heat-maps) at 7DIV and
14DIV (End concentration: 250 µM after complete degradation). D)
After one day, Zn-P-NPs (7 µM) show a significantly lower level of
intracellular zinc compared to Zn-BBB-NPs treated cells (10 µM).
After 8 days, a final zinc concentration of 48 µM (Zn-P-NPs) and
55 µM (Zn-BBB-NPs) was reached.
Zinc release in rat hippocampal neurons
In a parallel set of cell-based experiments, we investigated the extent of
Zn2+ release from NPs in Hippocampal neurons. As above,
cells were incubated with a 30 µM ZnCl2 solution as
zinc-loading control (Fig. S4) and a suspension of
Zn2+ loaded NPs (Zn-P-NPs and Zn-BBB-NPs) (End
concentration: 250 µM Zn2+ after NP degradation in
Neurobasal +B27, +Glut) (Fig. 4C,D). To maintain cell viability and ensure the growth and
maturation of primary hippocampal culture cells for 14DIV, the amount of NPs
loaded was reduced compared to the solution taken for HEK293 cells. Although the
local Zn2+ concentration at synapses after synaptic activity can
reach 300 µM, prolonged exposure to high free Zn2+
concentration causes cell death [15]–[17]. This
is nicely illustrated in supplemental data where we find that neurons are more
sensitive to free Zn2+ compared to HEK293 cells, however
concentrations higher than 160 µM lead to cell death in both cell cultures
(Fig.
S3).In these experiments, the background and 30 µM ZnCl2
fluorescence was measured at 7DIV and 14DIV and since no difference was obtained
(Fig.
S4), the average is used for the quantification of intracellular
Zn2+ elevation (Fig. 4C,D). After application of Zn2+ loaded NPs,
neurons display an increase in intracellular zinc concentration. The zinc level
can be reduced by replacing the growth medium with medium without NPs (data not
shown). This leads to Zn2+ efflux due to lower extracellular
Zn2+ concentrations in the culture medium (0.093 µg
Zn2+/ml = 1.42 µM for Neurobasal
medium with addition of B27, Pen/Strep and Glutamine measured by
Plasma-Massspectrometry). As in HEK293 cells, Zn-BBB-NPs in neuron elicits a
higher intracellular level of zinc compared to Zn-P-NPs treated cells (Fig. 4D).
Targeting Nanoparticles to specific neural cell populations
Based on these experiments, it can be assumed that the endocytosis of un-modified
NPs (P-NPs and BBB-NPs) in the CNS will occur in neurons as well as glial cells.
However, a more targeted drug release may be desired. Given that P-NPs can be
modified with almost any combination of ligands, we explored the possibility of
achieving cell type specific targeting. As a proof principle experiment, we
coupled NCAM1 and CD44 antibodies to the surface of NPs that recognize antigens
on the surface of neurons and glia, respectively. As a control for antibody
specificity, neuronal cultures were immuno-stained with antibodies against
NCAM1, CD44 and MAP2 a neuronal specific microtubule associated protein. As
expected, NCAM1 antibodies immuno-labeled MAP2 positive cells, whereas CD44
antibodies labeled glia cells (Fig.
5A).
Figure 5
Cell type specific targeting of BBB-NPs.
A) Immuncytochemistry of hippocampal neurons 14DIV stained with
antibodies against NCAM1, CD44 and MAP2. The neuronal protein NCAM1 is
found to label neurons that are also immuno-positive for MAP2 (upper row
of images). CD44 positive glia are not labeled with MAP2 (lower panel).
B) Fluorescent images of neuronal/glial cultures treated with
TMR-labeled NPs (red) coated with antibodies against NCAM1 or CD44.
Antibodies against MAP2 and the glial specific intermediate filament
associated protein GFAP (green) were used to label neurons and glia in
these cultures. Unmodified NPs (CNT-Ab-NPs) association with glial cells
as well as neurons (upper panel). NCAM1-NPs preferentially label MAP2
positive neurons (arrow, middle panel) but not GFAP positive glia. In
contrast, CD44-NPs preferentially label glial cells and a reduced
labeling of neurons (arrow, lower panel) is seen. Note that the
anti-CD44 ligand appears to promote NPs endocytosis. C) Quantification
of percent colocalization (yellow) between NPs (red) and MAP2 (green) or
GFAP (green) (n = 10). CD44-NPs show significantly
higher colocalization with GFAP compared to NCAM1-NPs and CNT-AB-NPs. In
contrast, NCAM1-NPs show significantly higher colocalization with MAP2
compared to GFAP and CNT-Ab-NPs. CD44-NPs and NCAM1-NPs show similar
colocalization values like CNT-Ab-NPs for MAP2 (CD44-NPs) and GFAP
(NCAM1-NPs).
Cell type specific targeting of BBB-NPs.
A) Immuncytochemistry of hippocampal neurons 14DIV stained with
antibodies against NCAM1, CD44 and MAP2. The neuronal protein NCAM1 is
found to label neurons that are also immuno-positive for MAP2 (upper row
of images). CD44 positive glia are not labeled with MAP2 (lower panel).
B) Fluorescent images of neuronal/glial cultures treated with
TMR-labeled NPs (red) coated with antibodies against NCAM1 or CD44.
Antibodies against MAP2 and the glial specific intermediate filament
associated protein GFAP (green) were used to label neurons and glia in
these cultures. Unmodified NPs (CNT-Ab-NPs) association with glial cells
as well as neurons (upper panel). NCAM1-NPs preferentially label MAP2
positive neurons (arrow, middle panel) but not GFAP positive glia. In
contrast, CD44-NPs preferentially label glial cells and a reduced
labeling of neurons (arrow, lower panel) is seen. Note that the
anti-CD44 ligand appears to promote NPs endocytosis. C) Quantification
of percent colocalization (yellow) between NPs (red) and MAP2 (green) or
GFAP (green) (n = 10). CD44-NPs show significantly
higher colocalization with GFAP compared to NCAM1-NPs and CNT-AB-NPs. In
contrast, NCAM1-NPs show significantly higher colocalization with MAP2
compared to GFAP and CNT-Ab-NPs. CD44-NPs and NCAM1-NPs show similar
colocalization values like CNT-Ab-NPs for MAP2 (CD44-NPs) and GFAP
(NCAM1-NPs).We then applied fluorescent NPs conjugated with anti-NCAM1 (anti-NCAM1-NPs) or
anti-CD44 antibodies (anti-CD44-NPs) to primary mixed hippocampal cultures to
evaluate their targeting behavior in presence of both, glia and neuronal cells
(Fig. 5B). As expected,
control NPs without further modification (CNT-Ab-NPs) associated with glial
cells and neurons to a similar degree (Fig. 5C). However, anti-NCAM1-NPs (NCAM-NPs)
show reduced targeting to glial cells together with highly increased targeting
to neurons stained for MAP2 (arrow Fig. 5B middle panel and C). In contrast, anti-CD44-NPs (CD44-NPs)
show increased targeting to glial cells stained for Glial fibrillary acidic
protein (GFAP) together with decreased targeting to neurons (arrow Fig. 5B lower panel and C).
Interestingly, the anti-CD44 ligand not only increases targeting to glial cells,
but appears to promote the endocytosis of NPs.
Discussion
Non-invasive CNS drug delivery systems have been actively studied, especially with
the development of colloidal carriers such as nanoparticles (NP) and liposomes.
Indeed, reports in the literature show that these carriers if properly engineered,
with a diameter around 100–200 nm, are able to cross the BBB without apparent
damage [18], and can
deliver drugs or genetic material into the brain [19], [20]. However, a selective
biodistribution within the CNS is highly needed and this goal is far from being
achieved. Nowadays, the use of a polymeric NP is one of the most promising
approaches for CNS drug delivery [18], [21], [22], because polymeric NPs possess advantages with respect to
free drug molecules or pro-drugs, such as a high drug-loading capacity [22]. In addition,
NPs protect the embedded drugs against chemical or enzymatic degradation, thus
increasing the chance for the active molecule to reach the target site. Only few
polymers currently guarantee the safety of the polymer-based nanocarriers.
Polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) or polylactide (PLA) polymers are biodegradable,
biocompatible, FDA-approved and are therefore two of the most promising polymers for
the preparation of NPs [18]. In this paper, we evaluated whether PLGA-based NPs could
efficiently deliver Zn2+ to neuronal cells.In brain chelatable Zn2+ has been detected in presynaptic vesicles of
glutamatergic terminals and Zn2+ ions are released from the
presynaptic site. At the postsynaptic site, Zn2+ ions are recruited
into large macromolecular platforms within the PSD, assembled by scaffolding
molecules such as ProSAP2/Shank3 and ProSAP1/Shank2, thus modulating the structure
of the protein meshwork underneath the postsynaptic membrane [23]–[26]. In animal models, zinc
exhibits antidepressant-like effects in the forced swim test, both in mice and rats
and in tail suspension test [27]–[31], which are used for evaluation of antidepressant
activity. Moreover, very low doses of zinc administered together with low,
ineffective doses of imipramine or citalopram enhanced the antidepressant-like
effect in this test [27], [32]. In humans, involvement of zinc in antidepressant therapy
has some clinical correlates. It was shown that humandepression is likely to be
accompanied by lower serum zinc concentrations [33]–[35]. Subjects suffering from major
depression showed significantly lower serum zinc levels than non-depressed controls,
whereas patients with minor depression showed intermediate zinc levels [36]. Furthermore, a
relationship between severity of depressive symptoms and decreased serum zinc
concentration in postpartum depression was demonstrated [37] and zinc supplementation showed
a significant reduction in anger-hostility and depression-dejection score in the
Profile of Moods State (POMS) of women, suggesting that zinc supplementation may be
effective in reducing anger and depression [38], [39].Here, we show that PLGA-based NPs can be considered as a promising drug delivery
system for the specific application of Zn2+ to CNS neurons. Several
kinds of Zn2+ loaded or unloaded NPs (un-modified or modified for
BBB crossing) were tested both in cultured fibroblast and primary neurons. The
experiments show that NPs themselves are not toxic to cells, even at concentrations
higher than those used for delivering Zn2+ (Fig. 1). In fact, cell viability is not affected
below approx. 5000 µg/ml of NPs, a concentration much higher than that needed
to efficiently deliver Zn2+ to cells. NPs decorated with the
BBB-crossing ligand (BBB-NPs), a glycopeptide consisting of 7 aminoacids are
slightly more toxic, however not at concentrations capable of dramatically
increasing intracellular Zn2+ levels. Nevertheless, the data
obtained should provide an important base line with respect to the evaluation of
toxicity of unloaded NPs for future experiments.Regarding NP mediated therapies, an important question is how, when and where NPs
release their content, e.g. interstitially or perhaps following cellular uptake. In
the event of endocytosis-mediated NP uptake, it is predicted that the forward
trafficking of these endocytic vesicles to lysosomes could enhance release rates of
zinc due to the low pH in lysosomes (Fig. 4). To test this hypothesis, we assessed the fate of Rhodamine
labeled P-NPs and BBB-NPs after application to cells together with FM-43 labeling
(Fig. 2D). Our results show
that NPs associate with the surface of cells and then seem to appear in an endocytic
compartment together with FM-1-43. This latter data indicates that they were
endocytosed by these cells (Fig.
2D,E). Interestingly, it seems that the presence of BBB-ligand
(glycopeptides) on the surface of BBB-NPs enhances the number of endocytotic events
compared to un-modified NPs. The glycopeptides covering the surface of BBB-NPs
exhibit a helix-like conformation [40] postulated to contribute to the entrance of BBB into
cells by stimulating membrane curvature and thus endocytosis. To date, no data on
the effect of this “membrane curvature effect” are available for
neurons, but a membrane “hopping” type mechanism is likely [41]. Due to the
fact that NPs are polymeric and not lipid based as liposomes, it is unlikely that
they are able to fuse with cell lipid membranes. However, NPs stay in very close
contact with the cell surface and released zinc could enter cells via specific or
unspecific transporters/ion channel systems. While feasible, the rise in cell soma
fluorescence associated with both Rhodamine-labeled BBB-NPs and P-NPs after 7 d,
indicates that at least some of these NPs entered and released their content inside
cells.This conclusion is consistent with our results showing that BBB-NPs can be used to
elevate the intracellular Zn2+ concentration in a cell-based assay
(Fig. 4). Given that the
release rate of encapsulated Zn2+ in NPs (Zn-NPs) measured
in vitro (Fig.
3) showed that after approximately 3 weeks, nearly all NPs released their
content, the elevation in zinc concentration might be due to an extracellular rise
in Zn2+ or endocytosed NPs releasing Zn2+ inside the
cell. However, in our cell-based experiments the release-rate of zinc is faster, and
perhaps cell autonomous, due to their uptake. This is exemplified by the observed
difference between BBB-NP and P-NP, where BBB-NPs are more readily taken up by
cells, resulting in higher intracellular levels of zinc.Since glial cells are known to clear the extracellular fluid of substances within the
brain, having NPs that selectively target neurons or glial cells will be helpful in
many ways. The extent to which glial cells participate in psychiatric disorders is
currently only beginning to be explored, but a crucial role of glia in a wide range
of neurological disorders has long been recognized. Although neurodegenerative
disorders such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, ALS and
Huntington's are caused by the death of neurons, glial cells have both a
positive and negative influence on the progression of these diseases [42]–[45]. To
differentially target neurons and glial cells, we designed antibody-engineered
labeled NPs using antibodies directed against an extracellular epitope specific for
neurons (NCAM1) and glial cells (CD44). These modified NPs demonstrate that a more
selective targeting strategy can be used to enrich zinc or other drugs in a cell
type specific manner. Intriguingly, in case of CD44, this ligand may influence
endocytosis positively. Based on the results of this study, the targeting behavior,
drug release properties and metabolism of the generated antibody-conjugated NPs can
be investigated in an in vivo model as a next step for future
application of NPs.
Conclusions
In this study we have characterized a novel nanoparticle technology, based on
PLGA NPs modified with glycopeptides known to promote the ability of NPs to
cross the BBB in vivo. We demonstrated that both un-modified
and BBB-crossing modified NPs, harboring substances released over time, are able
to influence neuronal cells in culture. We could show that these NPs can
efficiently deliver Zinc to cells at non-toxic concentrations. We also provided
evidence that NPs can be easily modified so that they preferentially target
specific cell populations, e.g. neurons versus glial cells, after crossing the
BBB. This strategy should improve the delivery of drugs to the CNS. Thus, this
work provides important base line data for future in vivo
application of Zn2+ delivery by using modified biodegradable
NPs.
Materials and Methods
Materials
ZnCl2, the Zn2+ chelator TPEN
(N,N,N′,N′-tetrakis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine)
and Zinpyr-1 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Primary antibodies were
purchased from Chemicon (MAP2), Abcam (GFAP), Fisher Scientific (anti-CD44,
clone OX-50), Lifespan Biosciences (NCAM1 extracellular domain) and Synaptic
Systems (Homer1). Secondary antibodies Alexa488, 568 and 647 were from
Invitrogen. Poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA RG502H) was used as received
from the manufacturer (Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany). BBB
ligand (glycopeptides) was provided by EZ-Biolab, (Carmel, USA). PLGA conjugated
with tetramethylrhodamine (TMR-PLGA) and conjugated with glycopeptides for BBB
crossing (BBB-PLGA) was prepared as previously described [3], [6]. FM1-43FX dye was purchased
from Invitrogen. A MilliQ water system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), supplied
with distilled water, provided high-purity water (18 MΩ). Unless otherwise
indicated, all other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and were of
analytical grade.
Preparation of Nanoparticles
NPs were prepared as described in literature [46] with some modifications in
the preparation procedure. For a typical formulation, 225 mg of ZnSO4
were dissolved in 0.25 ml of distilled water and emulsified in 2.5 ml of
CH2Cl2 (containing 50 mg of a mixture of PLGA 503 H
and BBB-PLGA (80∶20 w/w) (with or without 5–10 mg TMR-PLGA) by
sonication over an ice bath using a probe sonicator (Misonix, MicrosonTM
Ultrasonic Cell Disruptor XL, Opto-lab, Concordia, Mo, Italy) at 60 W output for
45 sec. The resulting primary emulsion was added to 5 ml distilled water
containing PVA 1% (15000 MW, Sigma-Aldrich) and was sonicated for 60 sec
at 100 W amplitude over an ice bath to form the double emulsion. Organic solvent
was removed by stirring at room temperature for at least 1 h and finally
purified by Hi-Speed Refrigerated Centrifugation (Beckman J21) at 14000 rpm for
10 min. Alternatively, we also obtained unloaded NPs (P-NPs and BBB-NPs) by
omission of drugs within the inner aqueous phase. With this procedure we were
able to obtain Zn-P-NPs (when using un-modified PLGA) and Zn-BBB-NPs (when
BBB-PLGA was used). In conclusion, labeled (TMR-conjugation) BBB-NPs as well as
NPs were obtained and purified to be tested in cell cultures.Antibody engineered NPs were prepared starting from PLGA NPs, obtained as
described before for P-NPs, and applying well known methodologies for Ab-surface
engineering of NPs [47]. Briefly, in the presence of EDC
(1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide, EDC) (170 mg) and
N–Hydroxy-succinimide (NHS, 30 mg) to conjugate the free primary amine
groups on the NPs surface with the carboxylic groups on the antibody molecules,
desired amount of TMR-labeled P-NPs (50 mg) was suspended and stirred at RT for
1.30 hr in MES (2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid, Sigma Aldrich) buffer with
designated volume of Anti-NCAM1 Ab (50 µl of a 1 mg/mL stock solution) or
Anti-CD44 Ab (50 µl of a 0.5 mg/mL stock solution) stock solution or a
corresponding amount of buffer solution, in order to obtain respectively
Anti-NCAM1-NPs, Anti-CD44 NPs and control group (CNT-Ab-NPs). After the
reaction, the suspension of the engineered NPs were collected by centrifugation
and further washed twice by distilled water for purification. Some amount of
engineered NPs was re-suspended in ultrapure water for further characterization,
while other NPs were lyophilized to prepare stocks (trealose was added as
cryoprotector).
NPs characterization
All the batches of NPs were characterized in their surface properties, size and
shape. All the data collected (data not shown) demonstrated that the surface
engineering (with Ab) of NPs or the loading with Zn did not affect the
morphological features of the NPs, all having similar dimensions and shape. A
scanning electron microscope (SEM) (XL-40 Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands)
(×10,000) was used to evaluate the morphology of NPs. Before the SEM
analysis, the samples were coated under argon atmosphere with a 10 nm layer of
palladium gold (Emitech K550 Supper Coated, Emitech LTD, U.K.). NPs in distilled
water were analyzed for particle size and zeta potential (z-p) by photon
correlation spectroscopy and laser Doppler anemometry using a Zetasizer Nano ZS
(Malvern, UK; Laser 4 mW He–Ne, 633 nm, Laser attenuator Automatic,
transmission 100% to 0.0003%, Detector Avalanche photodiode,
Q.E.>50% at 633 nm, T = 25°C). The results
were normalized with respect to a polystyrene standard solution.As scientifically established in literature, [47] the surface engineering of NPs
(Anti-NCAM1 or Anti-CD44 NPs) was demonstrated by Electron Spectroscopy for
Chemical Analysis (ESCA) study showing the presence of atoms (N) present on the
surface of antibody-engineered NPs and thus proof of success of the surface
engineering procedure. ESCA was performed on a 04-153 X-ray source analysis
system (PHI, Uvalca-PHI, Tokyo, Japan) and an EA11 hemispherical electron
analyzer (Leybold Optics, Germany), using MgKα1,2 radiations. The spectra
were recorded in fixed retardationratio (FAT) mode with 190 eV pass energy. The
pressure in the sample analysis chamber was ca. 10−9 mbar. The data were
acquired and processed using the RBD AugerScan 2. 1H-HRMAS NMR spectra were
recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 instrument; D2O was added to the sample, which
was then spun at 4000 Hz. All experiments were recorded at RT.
Determination of NPs content
10 mg of NPs (both batches of BBB and plain NPs) loaded with ZnSO4
were dissolved in 1 ml of DCM and 5 ml of milliQ water were added to the organic
solution. The organic solvent was removed by stirring at room temperature for at
least 3 h and finally the aqueous solution was filtered through a syringe filter
to eliminate the polymer insoluble in water. The final volume of the aqueous
solution was adjusted to 25 ml with distilled water and 1 ml of this solution
was diluted to 25 ml. The final aqueous solution was analyzed through atomic
absorption spectrophotometry. A 5 mM Zn2+ containing stock
solution (12.5 mg NPs/ml) was prepared. The results shown represent the mean of
at least 3 experiments.
Zn release from NP
10 mg of Zn-NPs (both BBB-NPs and P-NPs) loaded with ZnSO4 were
suspended in 1 ml of milliQ water into a dialysis membrane tube (3500 MW
cut-off). The dialysis membrane tube was then placed into a becker containing
the release medium (25 ml of milliQ water), which was stirred continuously and
maintained at 37°C. At determined intervals, 100 µl of release medium
solution was collected and then replaced with 100 µl of fresh milliQ
water. This sample was diluted to 25 ml with Milli-Q water and then the solution
was analyzed with atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The results shown
represent the mean of at least 3 experiments.
Hippocampal culture from rat brain
The preparation of hippocampal cultures was performed essentially as described by
Goslin et al. [48] with some modifications as detailed in Dresbach et
al. [49].
Cell culture experiments of hippocampal primary neurons from rat (embryonic
day-18; E18) were performed as described previously [50]. After preparation
the hippocampal neurons were seeded on poly-l-lysine (0.1 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich,
Steinheim) glas coverlslips. Cells were grown in Neurobasal medium (Invitrogen),
complemented with B27 supplement (Invitrogen), 0.5 mM L-Glutamine (Invitrogen)
and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen) and maintained at 37°C in
5% CO2. All animal experiments were performed in compliance
with the guidelines for the welfare of experimental animals issued by the
Federal Government of Germany and the National Institutes of Health. All of the
experiments were conducted in strict compliance with APLAC approved animal
protocols from Stanford University (protocol # 14607) and by the local ethics
committee (Ulm University) ID Number: O.103.
Immunhistochemistry
For immunofluorescence, HEK293 cells and primary cultures were fixed with
4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/1.5% sucrose/PBS at 4°C for 20 min
and processed for immunohistochemistry. After washing 3× 5 min with
1× PBS at RT, blocking was performed with 0.5% cold fish gelatine
(Sigma) and 0.1% Ovalbumin (Sigma)/1× PBS for 30 min at RT and the
cells were washed again 3× 5 min with 1× PBS at RT, followed by the
primary antibody at 4°C overnight. After a 3× 5 min washing-step with
1× PBS, incubation with the second antibody coupled to Alexa488, Alexa568,
Alexa647 or TexasRed (Molecular Probes) for 1 h followed. The cells were washed
again in 1× PBS for 10 min and 5 min with aqua bidest and mounted in Vecta
Shield mounting medium with or without DAPI (for staining the nucleus) for
fluorescence microscopy. To test cell viability, the number of DAPI positive
nuclei and neurons was counted from 10 optic fields for each condition.
Zinc staining
Zn-P-NPs and Zn-BBB-NPs were suspended in Neurobasal Medium (+Glutamine
+B27) and applied to cells. As Control, different solutions with defined
Zn2+ concentration were used. An aliquot of Zinpyr-1 DMSO
stock solution (5 mM) was diluted to a final concentration of 1–5 µM
in culture medium and the cells were incubated with Zinpyr-1 for 20 minutes at
37°C. After this, cells were washed in Ca/Mg Phosphate buffered saline and
used for confocal microscopy. Images were taken with the same exposure time and
grey values quantified using ImageJ v.1.44e. For quantification, the basic
fluorescence of the medium (grey value) was measured and subtracted from the
grey values of a defined ZnCl2 solution as well as the Zn-P-NPs and
Zn-BBB-NPs-suspension. The ratio of the normalized ZnCl2 solution to
the NPs suspension determined the final Zn2+ concentration.
Measurements were performed three times for each time point using different
exposure times.
Measurement of Zn2+ concentrations
The zinc-concentration of hippocampal cell culture medium was measured by
Plasma-Massspectrometry (ICP-MS) at the “Spurenanalytisches Laboratorium
Dr. Baumann” (Maxhütte-Haidhof, Germany).
Statistical analysis
Images were taken with a spinning disk confocal microscope (Zeiss) using
MetaMorph (Universal Imaging, Downing-town, PA) software. Quantification of
fluorescence data was performed using, Image J 1.44e software with JACoP plugin.
Statistical analysis in this paper was performed using Microsoft Excel for
Macintosh and data were tested for significance using two-tailed, Student's
t-test followed by ANOVA and p-values <0.05 were stated as significant
(<0.05*; <0.01**; <0.001***).Cells treated with unloaded P-NPs and BBB-NPs exhibited no difference
in their morphology and synapse density compared to untreated
cells. A) Dendrite branching was measured using MAP2 stained
neurons. The dendritic complexity index (DCI) [13] was calculated based on
the equation: [DCI = (# of prim. Dendrites *
1+# of sec. Dendrites * 2+# of tert. Dendrites * 3)/(# of
prim.+sec.+tert. Dendrites)]. B) The number of synapses per
unit length of dendrites was evaluated using Homer1 as postsynaptic marker
and Bassoon as presynaptic marker. The number of Homer1/Bassoon colocalizing
signals per 10 µm dendrite length is shown.(EPS)Click here for additional data file.A) Overview of images of HEK293 (upper panel) and neurons (lower panel) shown
in detail in Figure 2B.
White squares indicate regions shown in Figure 2B. Bottom row of images in each
panel are heat maps revealing regional differences in zinc levels. B)
Fluorescent images of neurons 1, 2, 6 and 7 days following the addition of
Rhodamine conjugated BBB-NPs. After 7 days the Rhodamine-BBB-NPs exhibit a
diffuse pattern suggesting that endocytosed BBB-NPs are partially released
into the cell soma.(EPS)Click here for additional data file.Prolonged exposure to high free Zn To
determine the range of viable intracellular Zn2+
concentrations and their limit for toxicity, we supplemented cell cultures
with increasing Zn2+ concentrations for 8 h. The results
show that neurons (upper row) are more sensitive to free
Zn2+ compared to HEK293 cells (lower row). After
supplementation of the medium with a concentration of 80 µM
Zn2+ and higher, neurons undergo cell death visible
through cell fractionation, which leads to a loss of intracellular fluid and
thus Zn2+ (full arrows). Additionally, condensed and
fractionated nuclei appear (open arrow). HEK293 cells undergo cell death at
Zn2+ concentrations higher then 160 µM, visible
through cells rounding up due to a loss of surface adhesion.(EPS)Click here for additional data file.Supplementation of HEK293 cells (left panel) and hippocampal neurons
(right panel) with ZnCl
). The
brightness of the Zinpyr-1 signal of untreated cells and cells treated with
a defined amount (30 µM) ZnCl2 was used to evaluate the
increase in zinc concentration by Zn-P-NPs and Zn-BBB-NPs (Fig. 4). The final zinc
concentration was calculated using grey values of Zinpyr-1 fluorescence.
Background fluorescence of untreated neurons was measured and cells treated
with 30 µM ZnCl2 used as reference. HEK293 cells were
supplemented with ZnCl2 at DIV0 and the zinc concentration was
evaluated after 1 and 3 days. Hippocampal neurons were supplemented with
ZnCl2 at DIV6 and the zinc concentration was evaluated at
DIV7 and DIV14.(EPS)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Thomas Dresbach; Anne Hempelmann; Christina Spilker; Susanne tom Dieck; Wilko D Altrock; Werner Zuschratter; Craig C Garner; Eckart D Gundelfinger Journal: Mol Cell Neurosci Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.314
Authors: Gabriel Nowak; Bernadeta Szewczyk; Joanna M Wieronska; Piotr Branski; Agnieszka Palucha; Andrzej Pilc; Krystyna Sadlik; Wojciech Piekoszewski Journal: Brain Res Bull Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Bernadeta Szewczyk; Piotr Brański; Joanna M Wierońska; Agnieszka Pałucha; Andrzej Pilc; Gabriel Nowak Journal: Pol J Pharmacol Date: 2002 Nov-Dec
Authors: Surya K Mallapragada; Timothy M Brenza; JoEllyn M McMillan; Balaji Narasimhan; Donald S Sakaguchi; Anup D Sharma; Svitlana Zbarska; Howard E Gendelman Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: Juan P Peñaloza; Valeria Márquez-Miranda; Mauricio Cabaña-Brunod; Rodrigo Reyes-Ramírez; Felipe M Llancalahuen; Cristian Vilos; Fernanda Maldonado-Biermann; Luis A Velásquez; Juan A Fuentes; Fernando D González-Nilo; Maité Rodríguez-Díaz; Carolina Otero Journal: J Nanobiotechnology Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 10.435
Authors: Lorella Pascolo; Barbara Bortot; Nuria Benseny-Cases; Alessandra Gianoncelli; Giovanni Tosi; Barbara Ruozi; Clara Rizzardi; Eleonora De Martino; Maria Angela Vandelli; Giovanni Maria Severini Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2014-06-07