AIM: To determine the rate of use and non-use of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. METHODS: All patients with HNC undergoing PEG between January 1, 2004 and June 30, 2006 were identified. Patients (or their next-of-kin) were surveyed by phone and all available medical records and cancer registry data were reviewed. Prophylactic PEG was defined as placement in the absence of dysphagia and prior to radiation or chemoradiation. Each patient with a prophylactic PEG was assessed for cancer diagnosis, type of therapy, PEG use, and complications related to PEG. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients had PEG tubes placed for HNC. Thirty four patients (33%) could not be contacted for follow-up. Of the 23 (22.3%) patients with prophylactic PEG tubes, 11/23 (47.8%) either never used the PEG or used it for less than 2 wk. No association with PEG use vs non-use was observed for cancer diagnosis, stage, or specific cancer treatment. Non-use or limited use was observed in 3/6 (50%) treated with radiation alone vs 8/17 (47.1%) treated with chemoradiation (P = 1.0), and 3 of 10 (30%) treated with surgery vs 8 of 13 (62%) not treated with surgery (P = 0.21). Minor complications were reported in 5/23 (21.7%). One (4.3%) major complication was reported. CONCLUSION: There is a high rate of unnecessary PEG placement when done prophylactically in patients with head and neck cancer.
AIM: To determine the rate of use and non-use of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. METHODS: All patients with HNC undergoing PEG between January 1, 2004 and June 30, 2006 were identified. Patients (or their next-of-kin) were surveyed by phone and all available medical records and cancer registry data were reviewed. Prophylactic PEG was defined as placement in the absence of dysphagia and prior to radiation or chemoradiation. Each patient with a prophylactic PEG was assessed for cancer diagnosis, type of therapy, PEG use, and complications related to PEG. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients had PEG tubes placed for HNC. Thirty four patients (33%) could not be contacted for follow-up. Of the 23 (22.3%) patients with prophylactic PEG tubes, 11/23 (47.8%) either never used the PEG or used it for less than 2 wk. No association with PEG use vs non-use was observed for cancer diagnosis, stage, or specific cancer treatment. Non-use or limited use was observed in 3/6 (50%) treated with radiation alone vs 8/17 (47.1%) treated with chemoradiation (P = 1.0), and 3 of 10 (30%) treated with surgery vs 8 of 13 (62%) not treated with surgery (P = 0.21). Minor complications were reported in 5/23 (21.7%). One (4.3%) major complication was reported. CONCLUSION: There is a high rate of unnecessary PEG placement when done prophylactically in patients with head and neck cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
Head and neck cancer; Percutaneous gastrostomy tube; Prophylactic
Authors: Marie-Astrid Piquet; Mahmut Ozsahin; Isabelle Larpin; Abderrahim Zouhair; Pauline Coti; May Monney; Philippe Monnier; René-Olivier Mirimanoff; Michel Roulet Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2002-08-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: D G Grant; P T Bradley; D D Pothier; D Bailey; S Caldera; D L Baldwin; M A Birchall Journal: Clin Otolaryngol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.597
Authors: Wuyang Yang; Todd R McNutt; Sara A Dudley; Rachit Kumar; Heather M Starmer; Christine G Gourin; Joseph A Moore; Kimberly Evans; Mysha Allen; Nishant Agrawal; Jeremy D Richmon; Christine H Chung; Harry Quon Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: Laura W J Baijens; Margaret Walshe; Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Christoph Arens; Reinie Cordier; Patrick Cras; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Chris Curtis; Wojciech Golusinski; Roganie Govender; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Kevin Hansen; Kate Heathcote; Markus M Hess; Sefik Hosal; Jens Peter Klussmann; C René Leemans; Denise MacCarthy; Beatrice Manduchi; Jean-Paul Marie; Reza Nouraei; Claire Parkes; Christina Pflug; Walmari Pilz; Julie Regan; Nathalie Rommel; Antonio Schindler; Annemie M W J Schols; Renee Speyer; Giovanni Succo; Irene Wessel; Anna C H Willemsen; Taner Yilmaz; Pere Clavé Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-12-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Stephanie M Shaw; Heather Flowers; Brian O'Sullivan; Andrew Hope; Louis W C Liu; Rosemary Martino Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: Daniel R Dickstein; Marc Egerman; Erica Monrose; Achintya Varma; Umut Ozbek; Sonam Sharma; Jerry T Liu; Vishal Gupta; Marshall R Posner; Krzysztof Misiukiewicz; Brett A Miles; Eric Genden; Richard L Bakst Journal: Head Neck Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 3.821