Literature DB >> 21447781

Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo.

Bassam Hassan1, Peter Nijkamp, Hans Verheij, Jamshed Tairie, Christian Vink, Paul van der Stelt, Herman van Beek.   

Abstract

The study aims were to assess the precision and time required to conduct cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in vivo on both three-dimensional (3D) surface models and multi-planar reformations (MPR) images. Datasets from 10 patients scanned with CBCT were used to create two types of images: 1. axial, coronal, and sagittal MPR images and 2. 3D surface models. Eleven observers identified 22 cephalometric landmarks on 3D surface models first and then using 3D in combination with MPR images twice independently. Tracing time was recorded in both methods. Precision was defined as the absolute difference between an observer's repeated measurements and the mean of all measurements per landmark. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were defined as the absolute difference of the observers' measurements from each other and from their repeated measurements averaged over all landmarks, respectively. The precision of measurements ranged between 0.29 ± 0.17 and 2.82 ± 7.53. Adding MPR alongside, 3D surfaces improved the precision of tracing for 15 of 22 of the landmark but it took on average twice as much time. Mean time required to trace one patient was 6:03 ± 2:48 and 10:41 ± 4:01 minutes for 3D and 3D + MPR, respectively (P = 0.0001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21447781     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

1.  Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.

Authors:  Abhishek Gupta; Om Prakash Kharbanda; Viren Sardana; Rajiv Balachandran; Harish Kumar Sardana
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.

Authors:  R A Katkar; C Kummet; D Dawson; L Moreno Uribe; V Allareddy; M Finkelstein; A Ruprecht
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.

Authors:  Abhishek Gupta; Om Prakash Kharbanda; Viren Sardana; Rajiv Balachandran; Harish Kumar Sardana
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.

Authors:  A Parsa; N Ibrahim; B Hassan; A Motroni; P van der Stelt; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Comparison of linear measurements between CBCT orthogonally synthesized cephalograms and conventional cephalograms.

Authors:  S Yang; D G Liu; Y Gu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in following simulated autogenous graft resorption in maxillary sinus augmentation procedure: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Sanja Umanjec-Korac; Azin Parsa; Aria Darvishan Nikoozad; Daniel Wismeijer; Bassam Hassan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.

Authors:  Alycia Sam; Kris Currie; Heesoo Oh; Carlos Flores-Mir; Manuel Lagravére-Vich
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  3D cephalometry on reduced FOV CBCT: skeletal class assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt plane-validity and reliability through comparison with 2D measurements.

Authors:  Marco Farronato; Cinzia Maspero; Andrea Abate; Cristina Grippaudo; Stephen Thaddeus Connelly; Gianluca Martino Tartaglia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Three-dimensional localization of impacted canines and root resorption assessment using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Eyad Almuhtaseb; Jing Mao; Derek Mahony; Rawan Bader; Zhi-Xing Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-18

10.  Frankfort horizontal plane is an appropriate three-dimensinal reference in the evaluation of clinical and skeletal cant.

Authors:  Suseok Oh; Jaemyung Ahn; Ki-Uk Nam; Jun-Young Paeng; Jongrak Hong
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.