| Literature DB >> 21447660 |
Frédéric Fumeron1, Amel Lamri, Charbel Abi Khalil, Riphed Jaziri, Isabelle Porchay-Baldérelli, Olivier Lantieri, Sylviane Vol, Beverley Balkau, Michel Marre.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In the French Data from the Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR) cohort, cross-sectional analyses have shown that a higher consumption of dairy products and calcium are associated with a lower prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). We assess the influence of dairy products on 9-year incident MetS and on impaired fasting glycemia and/or type 2 diabetes (IFG/T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Men and women who completed a food frequency questionnaire at baseline and after 3 years were studied (n = 3,435). Logistic regression models were used to study associations between the average year 0 and year 3 consumption of milk and dairy products, cheese, dietary calcium density, and incident MetS and IFG/T2D after adjusting for 1) sex, age, alcohol, smoking, physical activity, fat intake and 2) additionally for BMI. Associations between dairy products and continuous variables were studied by repeated-measures ANCOVA, using the same covariates.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21447660 PMCID: PMC3064033 DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1772
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Care ISSN: 0149-5992 Impact factor: 19.112
Incidence of the MetS and IFG/T2D according to dairy product consumption in the DESIR cohort
| No incident MetS (IDF) | Incident MetS (IDF) | No incident MetS (NCEP) | Incident MetS (NCEP) | No incident IFG/T2D | Incident IFG/T2D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dairy products (except cheese) | ||||||
| Group 1 (low) | 430 (69.2) | 191 (30.8) | 568 (81.5) | 129 (18.5) | 543 (77.5) | 158 (22.5) |
| Group 2 | 423 (75.3) | 139 (24.7) | 525 (84.1) | 99 (15.9) | 522 (83.8) | 101 (16.2) |
| Group 3 | 960 (81.4) | 220 (18.6) | 1,111 (87.3) | 162 (12.7) | 1,126 (87.0) | 169 (13.1) |
| Group 4 (high) | 525 (81.8) | 117 (18.2) | 608 (90.7) | 62 (9.3) | 607 (89.1) | 74 (10.9) |
| Unadjusted | 0.77 (0.71–0.84); | 0.78 (0.70–0.85); | 0.74 (0.68–0.81); | |||
| Model 1 | 0.86 (0.79–0.94); | 0.84 (0.76–0.93); | 0.83 (0.75–0.92); | |||
| Model 2 | 0.88 (0.79–0.97); | 0.89 (0.79–1.00); | 0.85 (0.76–0.94); | |||
| Cheese | ||||||
| Group 1 (low) | 718 (76.7) | 218 (23.3) | 847 (85.2) | 147 (14.8) | 868 (85.5) | 147 (14.5) |
| Group 2 (medium) | 511 (76.5) | 157 (23.5) | 636 (86.2) | 102 (13.8) | 639 (85.7) | 107 (14.3) |
| Group 3 (high) | 1,109 (79.2) | 292 (20.8) | 1,329 (86.7) | 203 (13.3) | 1,291 (83.9) | 248 (16.1) |
| Unadjusted | 0.93 (0.84–1.02); | 0.94 (0.84–1.05); | 1.07 (0.96–1.19); | |||
| Model 1 | 0.90 (0.80–1.00); | 0.86 (0.76–0.98); | 0.94 (0.83–1.07); | |||
| Model 2 | 0.88 (0.77–1.00); | 0.82 (0.71–0.95); | 0.93 (0.82–1.06); | |||
| Calcium density | ||||||
| Quartile 1 | 553 (74.6) | 188 (25.4) | 668 (82.8) | 139 (17.2) | 676 (81.8) | 150 (18.2) |
| Quartile 2 | 576 (75.7) | 185 (24.3) | 716 (86.6) | 111 (13.4) | 709 (84.3) | 132 (15.7) |
| Quartile 3 | 601 (79.7) | 153 (20.3) | 707 (85.0) | 125 (15.0) | 696 (84.6) | 127 (15.4) |
| Quartile 4 | 608 (81.2) | 141 (18.8) | 721 (90.4) | 77 (9.6) | 717 (88.5) | 93 (11.5) |
| Unadjusted | 0.87 (0.81–0.94); | 0.84 (0.77–0.92); | 0.85 (0.78–0.93); | |||
| Model 1 | 0.90 (0.82–0.97); | 0.86 (0.78–0.94); | 0.91 (0.83–1.00); | |||
| Model 2 | 0.86 (0.78–0.95); | 0.83 (0.75–0.92); | 0.90 (0.82–0.99); | |||
Data are n (%) or odds ratio (95% CI) unless otherwise indicated. Odds ratios were calculated by logistic regression and indicate the risk for a change from one category to the next. IDF, International Diabetes Federation; NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program.
†Model 1: adjustment for sex, age, smoking, total fat intake, physical activity.
‡Model 2: same as model 1 plus adjustment for mean BMI (mean of BMI at baseline and at 9 years of follow-up).