BACKGROUND: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) was designed as a rating scale for the severity of dysfunction in the cognitive and non-cognitive behaviours that are characteristic of persons with Alzheimer's disease. Its subscale, the ADAS-cog, is a cognitive testing instrument most widely used to measure the impact of the disease. However, the ADAS-cog takes more than 45 min to administer and requires a qualified clinical psychologist as the rater. A more comprehensive rating battery is therefore required. In the present study, we developed a computerized test battery named the Touch Panel-type Dementia Assessment Scale (TDAS), which was intended to substitute for the ADAS-Cog, and was specifically designed to rate cognitive dysfunction quickly and without the need of a specialist rater. METHODS: The hardware for the TDAS comprises a 14-inch touch panel display and computer devices built into one case. The TDAS runs on Windows OS and was bundled with a custom program made with reference to the ADAS-cog. Participants in the present study were 34 patients with Alzheimer's disease. Each participant was administered the ADAS-cog and the TDAS. The test scores for each patient were compared to determine whether the severity of cognitive dysfunction of the patients could be rated equally as well by both tests. RESULTS: Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a significant correlation between the total scores (r= 0.69, P < 0.01) on the two scales for each patient. The Kendall coefficients of concordance obtained for the three corresponding pairs of tasks (word recognition, orientation, and naming object and fingers) showed the three TDAS tasks can rate symptoms of cognitive decline equally as well as the corresponding items on the ADAS-cog. CONCLUSIONS: The TDAS appears to be a sensitive and comprehensive assessment battery for rating the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease, and can be substituted for the ADAS-cog.
BACKGROUND: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) was designed as a rating scale for the severity of dysfunction in the cognitive and non-cognitive behaviours that are characteristic of persons with Alzheimer's disease. Its subscale, the ADAS-cog, is a cognitive testing instrument most widely used to measure the impact of the disease. However, the ADAS-cog takes more than 45 min to administer and requires a qualified clinical psychologist as the rater. A more comprehensive rating battery is therefore required. In the present study, we developed a computerized test battery named the Touch Panel-type Dementia Assessment Scale (TDAS), which was intended to substitute for the ADAS-Cog, and was specifically designed to rate cognitive dysfunction quickly and without the need of a specialist rater. METHODS: The hardware for the TDAS comprises a 14-inch touch panel display and computer devices built into one case. The TDAS runs on Windows OS and was bundled with a custom program made with reference to the ADAS-cog. Participants in the present study were 34 patients with Alzheimer's disease. Each participant was administered the ADAS-cog and the TDAS. The test scores for each patient were compared to determine whether the severity of cognitive dysfunction of the patients could be rated equally as well by both tests. RESULTS: Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a significant correlation between the total scores (r= 0.69, P < 0.01) on the two scales for each patient. The Kendall coefficients of concordance obtained for the three corresponding pairs of tasks (word recognition, orientation, and naming object and fingers) showed the three TDAS tasks can rate symptoms of cognitive decline equally as well as the corresponding items on the ADAS-cog. CONCLUSIONS: The TDAS appears to be a sensitive and comprehensive assessment battery for rating the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease, and can be substituted for the ADAS-cog.
Authors: Matteo Canini; Petronilla Battista; Pasquale Anthony Della Rosa; Eleonora Catricalà; Christian Salvatore; Maria Carla Gilardi; Isabella Castiglioni Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 2.238
Authors: Edward H Ip; Ryan Barnard; Sarah A Marshall; Lingyi Lu; Kaycee Sink; Valerie Wilson; Dana Chamberlain; Stephen R Rapp Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 2.796