Literature DB >> 21446921

Pre-treatment choroidal thickness is not predictive of susceptibility to form-deprivation myopia in chickens.

Jeremy A Guggenheim1, Yen-Po Chen, Elaine Yip, Hélène Hayet, Vladimir Druel, Ling Wang, Jonathan T Erichsen, Alexandre R Tumlinson, Boris Povazay, Wolfgang Drexler, Paul M Hocking.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chicks developing experimentally-induced myopia show profound thinning of the choroid. We observed a wide range of choroidal thicknesses in a sample of normal chicks prior to their use in a pedigree-based study of form-deprivation myopia. Hence, we tested whether pre-treatment choroidal thickness predicted susceptibility to myopia.
METHODS: Retinal, choroidal and scleral thickness were measured using A-scan ultrasonography in normal White Leghorn chicks (n= 891) aged 4 days old, and again (n=498) after 4 days of monocular form-deprivation at age 8 days of age. Refractive error was assessed by retinoscopy. Relationships between pre-treatment choroidal thickness and other variables were investigated using general linear models and variance components analysis.
RESULTS: Untreated 4 day-old male chicks had choroids approximately 10% thinner than females (p<0.001), but sex explained <2% of the overall variability in choroidal thickness. Axial eye length in these untreated chicks was not significantly associated with choroidal thickness (p=0.25). Moreover, pre-treatment choroidal thickness was not predictive of susceptibility to form-deprivation myopia (p=0.89). Heritability analysis suggested that at least 50% of the variation in pre-treatment choroidal thickness was determined by additive genetic effects (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Parental choroidal thickness is the major determinant of choroidal thickness in untreated 4-day old chicks. Despite choroidal thickness potentially being indicative of ongoing emmetropisation to innate refractive errors, in this study it was not predictive of subsequent susceptibility to form-deprivation myopia. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics
© 2011 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21446921     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00827.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  7 in total

Review 1.  Is There Any Role for the Choroid in Glaucoma?

Authors:  Iman Goharian; Mitra Sehi
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Choroidal Thickness in Early Postnatal Guinea Pigs Predicts Subsequent Naturally Occurring and Form-Deprivation Myopia.

Authors:  Liqin Jiang; Xinyu Liu; Lei Zhou; Joanna M Fianza Busoy; Myo Thu Khine; Yee Shan Dan; Mengyuan Ke; Noel A Brennan; Karen J V Catbagan; Leopold Schmetterer; Veluchamy A Barathi; Quan V Hoang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

Review 4.  Circadian rhythms, refractive development, and myopia.

Authors:  Ranjay Chakraborty; Lisa A Ostrin; Debora L Nickla; P Michael Iuvone; Machelle T Pardue; Richard A Stone
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Choroidal thickness predicts ocular growth in normal chicks but not in eyes with experimentally altered growth.

Authors:  Debora L Nickla; Kristen Totonelly
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Emmetropic, But Not Myopic Human Eyes Distinguish Positive Defocus From Calculated Blur.

Authors:  Barbara Swiatczak; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Axial length change and its relationship with baseline choroidal thickness - a five-year longitudinal study in Danish adolescents: the CCC2000 eye study.

Authors:  Mathias Hvidtfelt Hansen; Line Kessel; Xiao Qiang Li; Anne Mette Skovgaard; Michael Larsen; Inger Christine Munch
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.209

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.