Despite nearly a century of use, the Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
vaccine continues to be controversial, with known variations in BCG
substrains and vaccine efficacy.Because vaccination policies and practices vary across time and
countries, we created the first searchable, online, open access database
of global BCG vaccination policy and practices, the BCG World Atlas
(http://www.bcgatlas.org/), which contains detailed
information on current and past BCG policies and practices for over 180
countries.The Atlas is for clinicians, policymakers, and researchers and provides
information that may be helpful for better interpretation of
tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics as well as design of new TB vaccines.
Tuberculosis: A Global Threat
Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the major causes of infectious morbidity and
mortality globally, claiming millions of lives every year. Approximately one-third
of the world's population is estimated to be infected with
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, giving rise to 9.4 million new
cases of active TB disease each year [1]. The majority of the TB burden exists in 22 high-burden
countries, but with immigration and global travel TB is difficult to eliminate from
any one country [1]–[4].The Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, first introduced in 1921, continues
to be the only vaccine used to prevent TB [5],[6]. Despite nearly a century of
use, BCG remains controversial, with known variations in BCG substrains, vaccine
efficacy, policies, and practices across the world. Global information on BCG
policies and practices may be useful for clinical interpretation of diagnostic tests
as well as in the design of novel TB vaccines that are under development.
BCG: A Range of Global Policies
While most experts agree that BCG is efficacious against severe forms of childhood
TB, its efficacy against TB in adults is highly variable [7]. As a result of the uncertain
efficacy of the BCG vaccine, countries have developed very different BCG vaccination
policies. Some countries, such as the United Kingdom, have or have had universal BCG
vaccination programs, while others (including Canada and the United States) either
only recommended BCG for high-risk groups or did not advocate BCG countrywide. The
Canadian situation was further complicated by differing policies across provinces,
where some provinces underwent mass vaccination programs and others did not. In
addition, BCG vaccination policies have varied by the number of doses used, the age
at which vaccination was given, and the methods used to deliver the vaccine
(although most countries today use only the intradermal route) [8]. Vaccination practices also have
changed within and across countries over the years, reflecting changes in evidence,
health policy, public perception, increasing or decreasing TB incidence, and HIV
incidence. As a result of these changes to the BCG policies in various countries, it
is necessary to not only know the current BCG vaccination policies but also past
policies and applicable changes when dealing with adults who received BCG
vaccination in childhood.Since the publication of the M. tuberculosis genome, comparative
genomic studies have documented that BCG vaccine strains have evolved and differ
from each other and from the original BCG first used in 1921 [9]. Because these genetic differences
affect antigenic proteins, these changes may translate into differences in efficacy
and effect on the tuberculin skin test (TST) [10],[11]. Work done by Ritz and Curtis
looking at global BCG strain variations demonstrates the diversity of strains used
by different countries and even within the same countries [12]. They found that 44%
(83/188) of countries reported using more than one BCG strain type during an
interval of only 5 years. This highlights the importance of documenting BCG
vaccination practices for both clinical and research purposes.Clinicians cannot be expected to know BCG practices in all countries, and immigrants
themselves may not know about the vaccination policies in their countries of birth
(most adult immigrants are unlikely to retain childhood vaccination records).
Information on diversity of BCG policies between countries and across time may be
helpful for better interpretation of TB diagnostics as well as design of new TB
vaccines. To our knowledge, there is no single, comprehensive, searchable database
of BCG policies and practices (past and present) across the world. We developed the
“BCG World Atlas: A Database of Global BCG Vaccination Policies and
Practices,” a database containing BCG information from each country across all
world regions (http://www.bcgatlas.org/). Figure 1 shows the homepage of the Atlas. To make
this resource practical and useful for clinicians, public health practitioners, and
researchers alike, our database captures both present and previous policy and
practices within a country, as well as any applicable changes.
Figure 1
Home page of the BCG World Atlas (http://www.bcgatlas.org/) and example of BCG policies and
practices in Japan.
Assembling the Database
Detailed information on past and present BCG vaccination policies and practices were
collected from as many countries as possible by one of three methods. First, short
respondent-completed questionnaires were sent out to at least two individuals in
each country. Questionnaires were sent to experts in TB research, TB control
programs, or public health/vaccination programs. Whenever possible, an attempt was
made to collect two completed questionnaires from each country in order to validate
the data. Questionnaires were available in English, French, and Spanish, and were
designed to capture both current policy and actual BCG practices, as well any
applicable changes that had occurred over the last 25 years. Detailed questions
asked for information concerning past as well as current practices, the timing and
nature of changes to the policies and or practices, repeat, multiple, or booster
shots, information concerning tuberculin skin testing in conjunction with BCG
vaccination, influence of HIV on the decision to vaccinate, and vaccine strain
differences. A total of 89 completed questionnaires were received over a 2-year
period. Second, data were abstracted from published papers, reports, and available
government policy documents retrieved through literature searches on PubMed and via
the World Wide Web. Third, we used immunization data available from the World Health
Organization Vaccine Preventable Diseases Monitoring System (http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/en/globalsummary/ScheduleSelect.cfm),
which provide basic information on all vaccines currently in use in each country
[13].Based on the data generated by all methods, countries were grouped into three main
categories: A), the country currently recommends universal BCG vaccination at a
certain age; B), the country used to recommend universal BCG vaccination but
currently does not; or category C), BCG vaccination is recommended only for selected
high-risk groups or was never recommended.
Summary of Findings
The beta version of the Atlas went live in the fall of 2008 with completed
questionnaires on BCG vaccination from 62 countries. Since that time, more data have
been added and several improvements have been made. As of October 2010, we have
collected data concerning BCG vaccination policies and practices for 180 of 209
(86%) countries worldwide that we approached. The database is available as an
interactive Web site at http://www.bcgatlas.org/, where
information for a particular country's BCG policy, along with its estimated
World Health Organization (WHO) TB incidence statistics, can be viewed alongside a
graphical map. Among the 180 countries with available data, 157 countries currently
recommend universal BCG vaccination, while the remaining 23 countries have either
stopped BCG vaccination (due to a reduction in TB incidence), or never recommended
mass BCG immunization and instead favored selective vaccination of “at
risk” groups (Figure 2).
Complete questionnaire data were available for 77 countries, while remaining data
were extracted from published sources.
Figure 2
Map displaying BCG vaccination policy by country.
A: The country currently has universal BCG vaccination program. B: The
country used to recommend BCG vaccination for everyone, but currently does
not. C: The country never had universal BCG vaccination programs.
Map displaying BCG vaccination policy by country.
A: The country currently has universal BCG vaccination program. B: The
country used to recommend BCG vaccination for everyone, but currently does
not. C: The country never had universal BCG vaccination programs.Many countries began BCG vaccination programs in the 1940s–1980s, though some
countries such as Romania and Uzbekistan report vaccination campaigns as early as
1928 and 1937, respectively, while some sub-Saharan African nations such as Nigeria
and Sierra Leone only began BCG vaccinations in 1991 and 1990. Nine countries have
ceased universal BCG vaccination programs; Spain and Denmark were among the first,
stopping in 1981 and 1986, respectively, while Austria and Germany had stopped by
1990 and 1998. The remaining countries, including the Isle of Man, Slovenia, UK,
Finland, and France, all ceased their BCG vaccination campaigns between 2005 and
2007. While these countries may have ceased mass universal vaccination programs,
many do continue to provide BCG vaccination selectively to high-risk individuals,
including those involved in high TB risk occupations and/or travel, and infants born
into high TB risk environments.We identified 49 countries that reported changes to their BCG vaccination policy in
the past 20 years. Twenty-seven countries reported major changes to their BCG policy
within the last 10 years. Of particular interest is the large number
(n = 33) of countries that had multiple
vaccination programs in the past, but have since ceased revaccination, and now use a
single BCG vaccination schedule (Table 1). These revaccination policy changes were as recent as 2007.
Sixteen countries continue to give an additional BCG vaccination after the initial
BCG, known as a booster vaccination (Table 2), while Kazakhstan, Belarus, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan
continue to recommend three BCG vaccinations, with the third given between the ages
of 12 and 15. Multiple revaccinations may lead to a delayed hypersensitivity
reaction also known as the Koch response (phenomenon), where a person previously
infected with M. tuberculosis is reinfected intracutaneously,
resulting in a local inflammatory reaction marked by necrotic lesions that develops
rapidly and heals quickly [14].
Table 1
Countries that have ceased booster BCG vaccinations
(n = 33).
1965: stopped booster at 7 yrs, 1986: stopped booster
at 15 yrs, 1979: stopped boosters for military conscripts
Taiwan
Yes
No
Yes
12 yrs
1982–1997
Thailand
Yes
No
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Turkey
Yes
No
Yes
7, 14, & 20 yrs
1997: stopped boosters at 14 & 20 yrs, 2006:
stopped boosters at 7 yrs
Uruguay
Yes
No
Yes
6–12 yrs
1980–1993
Uzbekistan
Yes
Yes: Ages 7 & 14
Yes
12, 15, 20, 25, & 30 yrs
1997
Zambia
Yes
No
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Table 2
Countries that currently recommend multiple BCG vaccinations
(n = 16).
Country
Age of 1st BCG
Age of 2nd BCG
Age of 3rd BCG
Armenia
At birth
7 yrs, if no scar
-
Belarus
After birth, within 1 yr
7 yrs
14 yrs
Croatia
At birth
14 yrs
-
Czech Republic
At birth
11 yrs
-
Fiji
At birth
6 yrs
-
Kazakhstan
At birth
6 yrs
12 yrs
Macedonia, FYR
At birth
7 yrs
-
Moldova
After birth, within 1 yr
6–7 yrs
-
Nigeria
At birth
5 yrs (but not yet incorporated into the immunization
schedule)
-
Norway
At birth
13–15 yrs
-
Philippines
At birth
Not specified
-
Russian Federation
At birth
7–14 yrs
-
Tunisia
At birth
6 yrs
-
Turkmenistan
After birth, within 1 yr
6–7 yrs
15 yrs
Ukraine
After birth, within 1 yr
7 yrs
-
Uzbekistan
At birth
7 yrs
14 yrs
Changes in vaccine strain were the most frequent type of change reported
(n = 42), and many countries have employed
several strains over the course of their BCG vaccination program's existence,
with countries reporting strain changes as recently as 2008.Additional variations in BCG vaccination administration are seen across countries.
Currently, eight countries recommend TST post–BCG vaccination, and two other
countries had this policy but have since ceased. Estimated national BCG coverage
ranged from 70% to 100%; however, frequently these estimates were not
available or were several years out of date. Finally, 19 countries that did not
recommend universal BCG vaccination did report BCG vaccination for certain at-risk
groups, most frequently health care workers and infants living in high-risk TB
settings. These variations highlight the importance of mapping these differences
across regions both for clinical purposes and research.
Open Access through an Interactive Web Site
The Atlas is an interactive Web site that allows users to select and view information
concerning a country's past and current BCG vaccination policy either by
clicking on an interactive map or by selecting the country of interest from a
drop-down list (Figure 1). The
Web site is available to the public and is free of charge. Over the past year
(during its beta phase), we have recorded over 6,000 visits to the site, with a
steady increase in traffic over time.
Implications for Diagnosis of TB
While novel diagnostics have been developed for latent TB infection (LTBI) [15]–[19], the TST continues
to be the most widely used diagnostic test worldwide [20]. False positives can occur in
BCG-vaccinated individuals, complicating interpretation of test results [21]. However,
research suggests the timing of vaccination plays an important role [9],[10]; in a
meta-analysis, Farhat et al. found BCG vaccination at infancy has only a minimal
effect on TST specificity, particularly if the TST is done more than 10 years after
the BCG was administered, whereas BCG later in life or if given more than once led
to more frequent, larger, and pronounced TST reactions [21]. The Atlas may help clinicians
interpret TST by providing the information necessary to assess whether the TST is a
valid diagnostic tool in a particular patient, or when alternative diagnostics may
be preferable.Newly available interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are more specific than TST
because they are not affected by previous BCG vaccination [19],[22]. Recent meta-analyses show
that the specificity of IGRA is high in all populations, and will be of greatest
utility in BCG-vaccinated populations [19],[23]. For example, TST may be less specific for LTBI in Japan
[24],[25] (Figure 1) or other countries that
revaccinate with BCG or have recently ceased revaccination programs (Table 1); in these settings,
IGRAs may be more specific than the TST. Conversely, the TST should not suffer from
non-specificity in India, for example, where BCG is given once at birth, as has been
borne out by research studies [26]–[28]. One of the applications of this database is its ability
to identify populations where repeated BCG immunizations were administered or where
BCG was administered after infancy, as these populations are most likely to benefit
from the use of highly specific IGRAs for the diagnosis of LTBI (Figure 3 and Box 1). Table 3 lists the 22 countries identified by the
WHO as representing 80% of the global TB burden, and their respective BCG
policies [29]. The
six bolded countries have either recommended booster BCGs in the past or currently
doing so, while the remaining 16 countries have not recommended booster BCG
vaccinations.
Figure 3
Countries most likely to benefit from highly specific IGRAs for the
diagnosis of LTBI.
One of the applications of this database is its ability to identify
populations where repeated BCG immunizations were administered or where BCG
was administered after infancy, as these populations are most likely to
benefit from the use of highly specific IGRAs for the diagnosis of LTBI.
Table 3
22 High TB burden countries and their respective BCG policies and
practices (in order of highest to lowest).
Country
Current BCG Vaccination
Timing of BCG 1
Booster BCG
Timing of BCG 2
Booster BCG in the past
India
Yes
At birth
No
N/A
No
China
Yes
At birth
No
N/A
Yes
Indonesia
Yes
After birth, within 1 yr
No
N/A
No
Nigeria
Yes
At birth
Yes
5 yrsa
N/A
Bangladesh
Yes
After birth, within 1 yr
No
N/A
No
Pakistan
Yes
At birth
No
N/A
No
South Africa
Yes
At birth
No
N/A
Yes
Ethiopia
Yes
At birth
No
N/A
No
Philippines
Yes
At birth
Yes
N/A
N/A
Kenya
Yes
At birth
No
N/A
N/A
Congo, Dem. Rep.
Yes
At birth
Unknown
N/A
N/A
Russian Federation
Yes
At birth
Yes
7–14 yrs
N/A
Vietnam
Yes
At birth
No
N/A
No
Tanzania
Yes
At birth
No
N/A
No
Brazil
Yes
At birth
No
N/A
Yes
Uganda
Yes
At birth
Unknown
N/A
N/A
Thailand
Yes
At birth
No
N/A
Yes
Mozambique
Yes
At birth
Unknown
N/A
N/A
Myanmar
Yes
After birth, within 1 yr: 6, 10, 14 weeks
N/A
N/A
Zimbabwe
Yes
At birth
Unknown
N/A
N/A
Cambodia
Yes
At birth
Unknown
N/A
N/A
Afghanistan
Yes
At birth
Unknown
N/A
N/A
Bolded rows identify countries likely to benefit from IGRAs due to
booster BCGs currently or in the past.
But not yet incorporated into the immunization schedule.
Box 1. Case Study Using the BCG Atlas.A 30-year-old man, born in the Slovak RepublicRecently arrived in Canada, as a new immigrantTST-positive (10 mm), and unremarkable chest X-rayNo known contact with an active TB caseNo documentation of BCG vaccination status, but has a vague memory of
receiving more than one BCG shotFrom the BCG Atlas:Slovak Republic: Universal BCG vaccinations at birth and BCG boosters at
ages 7 and 14 until 2001→ This individual probably received multiple BCG vaccinations post-infancy,
which may seriously compromise specificity of the TST; clinician decides to
order an IGRA, and based on a negative IGRA and other clinical factors,
clinician decides against recommending isoniazid preventative therapy (IPT).
Countries most likely to benefit from highly specific IGRAs for the
diagnosis of LTBI.
One of the applications of this database is its ability to identify
populations where repeated BCG immunizations were administered or where BCG
was administered after infancy, as these populations are most likely to
benefit from the use of highly specific IGRAs for the diagnosis of LTBI.Bolded rows identify countries likely to benefit from IGRAs due to
booster BCGs currently or in the past.But not yet incorporated into the immunization schedule.Along with novel approved diagnostics such as the IGRAs, there exist other novel
diagnostics in research and development stages that use antigens that vary across
BCG strains. These include, for example, the MPB64 patch test and serological tests
for the diagnosis of TB [30]–[32]. The BCG policies and practices of a particular country
may influence the use and utility of these tests in the future.
Implications for Immunization Strategies
Recently there has been renewed interest in developing novel vaccines for TB.
According to the Global Plan to Stop TB, 2006–2015, “effective TB
vaccines will be an essential component of any strategy to eliminate tuberculosis
(TB) by 2050” [33]. In 2009, at least six different vaccine candidates
completed Phase I clinical trials, and three are currently in Phase II [18]. Novel vaccine
candidates include both live and sub-unit vaccines. Many employ a heterologous
“prime-boost” strategy that complements the existing immune response to
BCG. Either the existing BCG or a new recombinant BCG is administered first, and
then the new vaccine serves as a “booster”. Different vaccines are being
developed that could be administered in infants and young children pre-exposure, and
others as adjuvants to chemotherapy post-exposure. Given that novel vaccines may
work to complement the existing BCG, it may be relevant to know what previous BCG
vaccination individuals have had, how many and at what ages prior to administering
novel “booster vaccines”. Similarly, we may be concerned that antigens
from the primary vaccination with BCG may affect the booster vaccine. Therefore, in
countries where revaccination with BCG was practiced, we might expect higher rates
of Koch response, or delayed hypersensitivity response.In 2007, the WHO revised its policy on BCG vaccination of children with HIV, making
HIV infection in infants a full contra-indication for BCG vaccination, even in
settings highly endemic for TB [34]. In 2008, the IUATLD BCG Working Group published a
consensus statement supporting the revised WHO BCG vaccination policy, but
recommended that current universal BCG immunization of infants continue in countries
highly endemic for TB until countries have programs in place for implementing
selective deferral of BCG vaccination in infants exposed to HIV [35]. As
countries respond to these new global recommendations, changes in vaccination
policies because of the HIV epidemic should be captured in future updates of the
Atlas.
Conclusions
Despite nearly a century of use, the BCG vaccine continues to be controversial, and
policies and practices vary widely across the world. Many countries have experienced
major changes in regards to revaccination over the past 20 years. The BCG World
Atlas: A Database of Global BCG Vaccination Policy and Practices is an interactive
Web site that attempts to provide the clinician, researcher, and pubic health
practitioner alike with resources and information necessary to interpret current and
novel TB diagnostics and conduct fruitful research on novel vaccines. Most
critically, this is a useful resource for the TB community and is publicly available
free of charge through an easy-to-use Web site.
Authors: R Diel; D Goletti; G Ferrara; G Bothamley; D Cirillo; B Kampmann; C Lange; M Losi; R Markova; G B Migliori; A Nienhaus; M Ruhwald; D Wagner; J P Zellweger; E Huitric; A Sandgren; D Manissero Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Karen R Steingart; Megan Henry; Suman Laal; Philip C Hopewell; Andrew Ramsay; Dick Menzies; Jane Cunningham; Karin Weldingh; Madhukar Pai Journal: Thorax Date: 2007-08-03 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Madhukar Pai; Kaustubh Gokhale; Rajnish Joshi; Sandeep Dogra; Shriprakash Kalantri; Deepak K Mendiratta; Pratibha Narang; Charles L Daley; Reuben M Granich; Gerald H Mazurek; Arthur L Reingold; Lee W Riley; John M Colford Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-06-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M Pai; R Joshi; S Dogra; A A Zwerling; D Gajalakshmi; K Goswami; M V R Reddy; A Kalantri; P C Hill; D Menzies; P C Hopewell Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Chelsea Carpenter; John Sidney; Ravi Kolla; Kaustuv Nayak; Helena Tomiyama; Claudia Tomiyama; Oscar A Padilla; Virginie Rozot; Syed F Ahamed; Carlos Ponte; Valeria Rolla; Paulo R Antas; Anmol Chandele; John Kenneth; Seetha Laxmi; Edward Makgotlho; Valentina Vanini; Giuseppe Ippolito; Alexandra S Kazanova; Alexander V Panteleev; Willem Hanekom; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza; David Lewinsohn; Mayuko Saito; M Juliana McElrath; W Henry Boom; Delia Goletti; Robert Gilman; Irina V Lyadova; Thomas J Scriba; Esper G Kallas; Kaja Murali-Krishna; Alessandro Sette; Cecilia S Lindestam Arlehamn Journal: Tuberculosis (Edinb) Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 3.131
Authors: Jason R Andrews; Mark Hatherill; Hassan Mahomed; Willem A Hanekom; Monica Campo; Thomas R Hawn; Robin Wood; Thomas J Scriba Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Meredith M Howley; John A Painter; Dolores J Katz; Edward A Graviss; Randall Reves; Suzanne F Beavers; Denise O Garrett Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Mark Hatherill; Hendrik Geldenhuys; Bernadette Pienaar; Sara Suliman; Phalkun Chheng; Sara M Debanne; Daniel F Hoft; W Henry Boom; Willem A Hanekom; John L Johnson Journal: Vaccine Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.641