| Literature DB >> 21444134 |
Amanda Black1, Ronald G McLaren, Suzanne M Reichman, Thomas W Speir, Leo M Condron.
Abstract
Few studies have quantified the accuracy of soil metal bioavailability assays using large datasets. A meta-analysis from experiments spanning 6 months to 13 years on 12 soil types, compared bioavailability estimate efficiencies for wheat and ryegrass. Treatments included biosolids ± metals, comparing total metal, Ca(NO₃)₂, EDTA, soil solution, DGT and free ion activity. The best correlations between soil metal bioavailability and shoot concentrations were for Ni using Ca(NO₃)₂ (r² = 0.72) which also provided the best estimate of Zn bioavailability (r² = 0.64). DGT provided the best estimate of Cd bioavailability, accounting for 49% of shoot Cd concentrations. There was no reliable descriptor of Cu bioavailability, with less than 35% of shoot Cu concentrations defined. Thus interpretation of data obtained from many soil metal bioavailability assays is unreliable and probably flawed, and there is little justification to look beyond Ca(NO₃)₂ for Ni and Zn, and DGT for Cd.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21444134 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.03.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Pollut ISSN: 0269-7491 Impact factor: 8.071