Literature DB >> 21442610

Multicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation.

M H Møller1, S Adamsen, R W Thomsen, A M Møller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality rates in patients with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remain substantial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a multimodal and multidisciplinary perioperative care protocol on mortality in patients with PPU.
METHODS: This was an externally controlled multicentre trial set in seven gastrointestinal departments in Denmark. Consecutive patients who underwent surgery for gastric or duodenal PPU between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2009 were treated according to a multimodal and multidisciplinary evidence-based perioperative care protocol. The 30-day mortality rate in this group was compared with rates in historical and concurrent national controls.
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate following PPU was 17·1 per cent in the intervention group, compared with 27·0 per cent in the three control groups (P = 0·005). This corresponded to a relative risk of 0·63 (95 per cent confidence interval 0·41 to 0·97), a relative risk reduction of 37 (5 to 58) per cent and a number needed to treat of 10 (6 to 38).
CONCLUSION: The 30-day mortality rate in patients with PPU was reduced by more than one-third after the implementation of a multimodal and multidisciplinary perioperative care protocol, compared with conventional treatment. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00624169 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Copyright © 2011 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21442610     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  28 in total

1.  Survival After Emergency General Surgery: What can We Learn from Enhanced Recovery Programmes?

Authors:  N Quiney; G Aggarwal; M Scott; M Dickinson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Physical performance following acute high-risk abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Line Rokkedal Jønsson; Lina Holm Ingelsrud; Line Toft Tengberg; Thomas Bandholm; Nicolai Bang Foss; Morten Tange Kristensen
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Preoperative factors influencing mortality and morbidity in peptic ulcer perforation.

Authors:  P Sivaram; A Sreekumar
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Outcomes of Nonoperative Treatment for Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation: a Nationwide Study of 14,918 Inpatients in Japan.

Authors:  Takaaki Konishi; Michimasa Fujiogi; Nobuaki Michihata; Ryosuke Kumazawa; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Masahiko Tanabe; Yasuyuki Seto; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Jan Terje Kvaløy; Tom Glomsaker; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Perforated duodenal ulcer in high risk patients: is percutaneous drainage justified?

Authors:  Aly Saber; Mohammad A Gad; Gouda M Ellabban
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-01

7.  Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Is Laparoscopy a New Paradigm?

Authors:  André Pereira; Hugo Santos Sousa; Diana Gonçalves; Eduardo Lima da Costa; André Costa Pinho; Elisabete Barbosa; José Barbosa
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2021-05-12

8.  Effect of intermediate care on mortality following emergency abdominal surgery. The InCare trial: study protocol, rationale and feasibility of a randomised multicentre trial.

Authors:  Morten Vester-Andersen; Tina Waldau; Jørn Wetterslev; Morten Hylander Møller; Jacob Rosenberg; Lars Nannestad Jørgensen; Inger Gillesberg; Henrik Loft Jakobsen; Egon Godthåb Hansen; Lone Musaeus Poulsen; Jan Skovdal; Ellen Kristine Søgaard; Morten Bestle; Jesper Vilandt; Iben Rosenberg; Rasmus Ehrenfried Berthelsen; Jens Pedersen; Mogens Rørbæk Madsen; Thomas Feurstein; Malene Just Busse; Johnny D H Andersen; Christian Maschmann; Morten Rasmussen; Christian Jessen; Lasse Bugge; Helle Ørding; Ann Merete Møller
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Incidence and short-term mortality from perforated peptic ulcer in Korea: a population-based study.

Authors:  Seungjin Bae; Ki-Nam Shim; Nayoung Kim; Jung Mook Kang; Dong-Sook Kim; Kyoung-Min Kim; Yu Kyung Cho; Sung Woo Jung
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.