Literature DB >> 21442278

Determining the mechanism by which fish diversity influences production.

Michael P Carey1, David H Wahl.   

Abstract

Understanding the ability of biodiversity to govern ecosystem function is essential with current pressures on natural communities from species invasions and extirpations. Changes in fish communities can be a major determinant of food web dynamics, and even small shifts in species composition or richness can translate into large effects on ecosystems. In addition, there is a large information gap in extrapolating results of small-scale biodiversity-ecosystem function experiments to natural systems with realistic environmental complexity. Thus, we tested the key mechanisms (resource complementarity and selection effect) for biodiversity to influence fish production in mesocosms and ponds. Fish diversity treatments were created by replicating species richness and species composition within each richness level. In mesocosms, increasing richness had a positive effect on fish biomass with an overyielding pattern indicating species mixtures were more productive than any individual species. Additive partitioning confirmed a positive net effect of biodiversity driven by a complementarity effect. Productivity was less affected by species diversity when species were more similar. Thus, the primary mechanism driving fish production in the mesocosms was resource complementarity. In the ponds, the mechanism driving fish production changed through time. The key mechanism was initially resource complementarity until production was influenced by the selection effect. Varying strength of intraspecific interactions resulting from differences in resource levels and heterogeneity likely caused differences in mechanisms between the mesocosm and pond experiments, as well as changes through time in the ponds. Understanding the mechanisms by which fish diversity governs ecosystem function and how environmental complexity and resource levels alter these relationships can be used to improve predictions for natural systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21442278     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-1967-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  28 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  M Loreau; S Naeem; P Inchausti; J Bengtsson; J P Grime; A Hector; D U Hooper; M A Huston; D Raffaelli; B Schmid; D Tilman; D A Wardle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A mechanistic basis for underyielding in phytoplankton communities.

Authors:  Andrea Schmidtke; Ursula Gaedke; Guntram Weithoff
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services.

Authors:  Boris Worm; Edward B Barbier; Nicola Beaumont; J Emmett Duffy; Carl Folke; Benjamin S Halpern; Jeremy B C Jackson; Heike K Lotze; Fiorenza Micheli; Stephen R Palumbi; Enric Sala; Kimberley A Selkoe; John J Stachowicz; Reg Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Effects of species diversity on community biomass production change over the course of succession.

Authors:  Jerome J Weis; Bradley J Cardinale; Kenneth J Forshay; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity.

Authors:  J Emmett Duffy; Bradley J Cardinale; Kristin E France; Peter B McIntyre; Elisa Thébault; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 6.  Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes.

Authors:  Helmut Hillebrand; Danuta M Bennett; Marc W Cadotte
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 7.  Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research.

Authors:  Helmut Hillebrand; Birte Matthiessen
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Studying the effects of plant species richness on ecosystem functioning: does the choice of experimental design matter?

Authors:  Juha Mikola; Veikko Salonen; Heikki Setälä
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity.

Authors:  Michael A Huston
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Interactions of multiple predators with different foraging modes in an aquatic food web.

Authors:  Michael P Carey; David H Wahl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  5 in total

1.  Experimental evaluation of diversity-productivity relationships in a coral reef fish assemblage.

Authors:  Vanessa Messmer; Shane A Blowes; Geoffrey P Jones; Philip L Munday
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Loss of rare fish species from tropical floodplain food webs affects community structure and ecosystem multifunctionality in a mesocosm experiment.

Authors:  Richard M Pendleton; David J Hoeinghaus; Luiz C Gomes; Angelo A Agostinho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Global evidence of positive impacts of freshwater biodiversity on fishery yields.

Authors:  Emma Grace Elizabeth Brooks; Robert Alan Holland; William Robert Thomas Darwall; Felix Eigenbrod; Derek Tittensor
Journal:  Glob Ecol Biogeogr       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 7.144

4.  Physiological and ecological effects of increasing temperature on fish production in lakes of Arctic Alaska.

Authors:  Michael P Carey; Christian E Zimmerman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and classical biological control.

Authors:  Edward W Evans
Journal:  Appl Entomol Zool       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 1.403

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.