Literature DB >> 19777265

Interactions of multiple predators with different foraging modes in an aquatic food web.

Michael P Carey1, David H Wahl.   

Abstract

Top predators can have different foraging modes that may alter their interactions and effects on food webs. Interactions between predators may be non-additive resulting from facilitation or interference, whereas their combined effects on a shared prey may result in emergent effects that are risk enhanced or risk reduced. To test the importance of multiple predators with different foraging modes, we examined the interaction between a cruising predator (largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides) and an ambush predator (muskellunge, Esox masquinongy) foraging on a shared prey (bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus) with strong anti-predator defense behaviors. Additive and substitution designs were used to compare individual to combined predator treatments in experimental ponds. The multiple predator interaction facilitated growth of the cruising predator in the combined predator treatments, whereas predator species had substitutable effects on the growth of the ambush predator. The combined predator treatments created an emergent effect on the prey; however, the direction was dependent on the experimental design. The additive design found a risk-reducing effect, whereas the substitution design found a risk-enhancing effect for prey fish. Indirect effects from the predators weakly extended to lower trophic levels (i.e., zooplankton community). Our results highlight the need to consider differences in foraging mode of top predators, interactions between predators, and emergent effects on prey to understand food webs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19777265     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1461-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs.

Authors:  J J Elser; W F Fagan; R F Denno; D R Dobberfuhl; A Folarin; A Huberty; S Interlandi; S S Kilham; E McCauley; K L Schulz; E H Siemann; R W Sterner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades.

Authors:  Deborah L Finke; Robert F Denno
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Multiple predator effects result in risk reduction for prey across multiple prey densities.

Authors:  Heather D Vance-Chalcraft; Daniel A Soluk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions.

Authors:  Evan L Preisser; John L Orrock; Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Predator diversity and trophic interactions.

Authors:  Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton.

Authors:  J L Brooks; S I Dodson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters.

Authors:  Henri J Dumont; Isabella Van de Velde; Simonne Dumont
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Predator identity and additive effects in a treehole community.

Authors:  Marcus W Griswold; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Context-dependent effects of bluegill in experimental mesocosm communities.

Authors:  W H Nowlin; R W Drenner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Strike feeding behavior in the muskellunge, Esox masquinongy: contributions of the lateral line and visual sensory systems.

Authors:  J G New; L Alborg Fewkes; A N Khan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  7 in total

1.  Determining the mechanism by which fish diversity influences production.

Authors:  Michael P Carey; David H Wahl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Shoaling behaviour enhances risk of predation from multiple predator guilds in a marine fish.

Authors:  John R Ford; Stephen E Swearer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Non-interactive multiple predator effects on tadpole survival.

Authors:  Oscar Ramos; Josh Van Buskirk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Predator-prey interactions mediated by prey personality and predator hunting mode.

Authors:  Benjamin A Belgrad; Blaine D Griffen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Behavioural syndrome in a solitary predator is independent of body size and growth rate.

Authors:  Marina J Nyqvist; Rodolphe E Gozlan; Julien Cucherousset; J Robert Britton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sum of fears among intraguild predators drives the survival of green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) eggs.

Authors:  Chen-Pan Liao; Jung-Ya Hsu; Shi-Ping Huang; Rulon W Clark; Jhan-Wei Lin; Hui-Yun Tseng; Wen-San Huang
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Plant Resources as a Factor Altering Emergent Multi-Predator Effects.

Authors:  Dionyssia A Maselou; Dionyssios Ch Perdikis; Maurice W Sabelis; Argyro A Fantinou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.