Literature DB >> 31938844

Reduction of cybersickness during and immediately following noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Séamas Weech1,2, Travis Wall3, Michael Barnett-Cowan3.   

Abstract

The mechanism underlying cybersickness during virtual reality (VR) exposure is still poorly understood, although research has highlighted a causal role for visual-vestibular sensory conflict. Recently established methods for reducing cybersickness include galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) to mimic absent vestibular cues in VR, or vibration of the vestibular organs to add noise to the sensory modality. Here, we examined if applying noise to the vestibular system using noisy-current GVS affects sickness severity in VR. Participants were exposed to one of the two VR games that were classified as either moderately or intensely nauseogenic. The VR content lasted for 50 min and was broken down into three blocks: 30 min of gameplay during exposure to either noisy GVS (± 1750 μA) or sham stimulation (0 μA), and 10 min of gameplay before and after this block. We characterized the effects of noisy GVS in terms of post-minus-pre-exposure cybersickness scores. In the intense VR condition, we found a main effect of noisy vestibular stimulation on a verbal cybersickness scale, but not for questionnaire measures of cybersickness. Participants reported lower cybersickness scores during and directly after exposure to GVS. However, this difference was quickly extinguished (~ 3-6 min) after further VR exposure, indicating that sensory adaptation did not persist after stimulation was terminated. In contrast, there were no differences between the sham and GVS group for the moderate VR content. The results show the potential for reducing cybersickness with non-invasive sensory stimulation. We address possible mechanisms for the observed effects, including noise-induced sensory re-weighting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multisensory integration; Sensory conflict; Sensory re-weighting; Virtual reality

Year:  2020        PMID: 31938844     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05718-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  The critical role of velocity storage in production of motion sickness.

Authors:  Bernard Cohen; Mingjia Dai; Theodore Raphan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Stochastic galvanic vestibular stimulation produces a small reduction in sway in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sudipto Pal; Sally M Rosengren; James G Colebatch
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 4.  The sense of self-motion, orientation and balance explored by vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Rebecca J St George; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Vestibular thresholds for yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Luzia Grabherr; Keyvan Nicoucar; Fred W Mast; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Validating an efficient method to quantify motion sickness.

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Alleviating simulator sickness with galvanic cutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  Germán Gálvez-García; Marion Hay; Catherine Gabaude
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Motion control, motion sickness, and the postural dynamics of mobile devices.

Authors:  Thomas A Stoffregen; Yi-Chou Chen; Frank C Koslucher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Brainstem processing of vestibular sensory exafference: implications for motion sickness etiology.

Authors:  Charles M Oman; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Pre-adaptation to noisy Galvanic vestibular stimulation is associated with enhanced sensorimotor performance in novel vestibular environments.

Authors:  Steven T Moore; Valentina Dilda; Tiffany R Morris; Don A Yungher; Hamish G MacDougall
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Galvanic vestibular stimulation as a novel treatment for seasickness.

Authors:  Yoni Evgeni Gutkovich; Daniel Lagami; Anna Jamison; Yuri Fonar; Dror Tal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Testing landmark-specific effects on route navigation in an ecologically valid setting: a simulated driving study.

Authors:  Yasaman Jabbari; Darren M Kenney; Martin von Mohrenschildt; Judith M Shedden
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-03-07

3.  A digital intervention using virtual reality helmets to reduce dental anxiety of children under local anesthesia and primary teeth extraction: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Qin Du; Xinru Ma; Shasha Wang; Shiyu Zhou; Chunmei Luo; Kun Tian; Wei Fei; Xianghong Liu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Joint and individual effectiveness of galvanic cutaneous stimulation and tactile stimulation at decreasing Simulator Adaptation Syndrome.

Authors:  Germán Gálvez-García; Javier Albayay; Fernando Fonseca; Claudio Bascour-Sandoval
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.