Literature DB >> 21442218

Spatial and temporal aspects of cognitive influences on smooth pursuit.

Sara A Winges1, John F Soechting.   

Abstract

It is well known that prediction is used to overcome processing delays within the motor system and ocular control is no exception. Motion extrapolation is one mechanism that can be used to overcome the visual processing delay. Expectations based on previous experience or cognitive cues are also capable of overcoming this delay. The present experiment was designed to examine how smooth pursuit is altered by cognitive information about the time and/or direction of an upcoming change in target direction. Subjects visually tracked a cursor as it moved at a constant velocity on a computer screen. The target initially moved from left to right and then abruptly reversed horizontal direction and traveled along one of seven possible oblique paths. In half of the trials, a cue was present throughout the trial to signal the position (as well as the time), and/or the direction of the upcoming change. Whenever a position cue (which will be referred to as a timing cue throughout the paper) was present, there were clear anticipatory adjustments to the horizontal velocity component of smooth pursuit. In the presence of a timing cue, a directional cue also led to anticipatory adjustments in the vertical velocity, and hence the direction of smooth pursuit. However, without the timing cue, a directional cue alone produced no anticipation. Thus, in this task, a cognitive spatial cue about the new direction could not be used unless it was made explicit in the time domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21442218      PMCID: PMC3163841          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2638-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Eye movement responses to a horizontally moving visual stimulus.

Authors:  G WESTHEIMER
Journal:  AMA Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1954-12

2.  Oculomotor tracking in two dimensions.

Authors:  K C Engel; J H Anderson; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Smooth pursuit tracking of an abrupt change in target direction: vector superposition of discrete responses.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Leigh A Mrotek; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Predicting curvilinear target motion through an occlusion.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Velocity scaling of cue-induced smooth pursuit acceleration obeys constraints of natural motion.

Authors:  Jennifer Ladda; Thomas Eggert; Stefan Glasauer; Andreas Straube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cognitive expectations, not habits, control anticipatory smooth oculomotor pursuit.

Authors:  E Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Predictive smooth pursuit of complex two-dimensional trajectories in monkey: component interactions.

Authors:  R E Kettner; H C Leung; B W Peterson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Human smooth pursuit: stimulus-dependent responses.

Authors:  J R Carl; R S Gellman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Anticipatory eye movements evoked after active following versus passive observation of a predictable motion stimulus.

Authors:  M R Burke; G R Barnes
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  3 in total

1.  Anticipatory smooth eye movements with random-dot kinematograms.

Authors:  Elio M Santos; Edinah K Gnang; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Visual tracking in very preterm infants at 4 mo predicts neurodevelopment at 3 y of age.

Authors:  Ylva Fredriksson Kaul; Kerstin Rosander; Claes von Hofsten; Katarina Strand Brodd; Gerd Holmström; Alexander Kaul; Birgitta Böhm; Lena Hellström-Westas
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing.

Authors:  Zenon Mathews; Ryszard Cetnarski; Paul F M J Verschure
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.