Literature DB >> 21440697

Bone densitometry.

Kwang J Chun1.   

Abstract

Conventional radiographic methods allow physicians to visualize bone structure. However, they do not offer information on the bone mineral density (BMD), which can facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Bone densitometry, by contrast, helps to detect bone mineral loss at an early stage because it provides accurate quantitative measurement of BMD. With an emphasis on quantification, shorter scanning time and precision, scientists have been developing BMD measurement devices that use absorption technique. They first developed single-energy absorptiometry (single-photon absorptiometry) by using I-125, which could measure BMD of peripheral bones. Single-photon absorptiometry was replaced by dual-energy absorptiometry (dual photon absorptiometry [DPA]) that used gadolinium-153. DPA had greater accuracy in measuring the BMD of central skeletal bones. Single-energy x-ray absorptiometry was also developed but it had limitations in measuring central skeletal BMD. In the mid-1980s, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was introduced and widely accepted for the early detection, treatment, and follow-up study of osteoporosis. There are several reasons for the popularity. DXA can measure BMD of posteroanterior spine and hip in a much shorter time than DPA while being capable of measuring BMD of peripheral bones. Other advantages include very low radiation doses to the patients, high image resolution, precision, and stable calibration of the instruments. In recent years, DXA has also been applied to lateral spine for the density of trabecular bone, to the whole body for the measurement of total body bone density and for the body composition, and to the spine for the vertebral fracture assessment. Still, posteroanterior spine and hip scans remain the most common applications of DXA because data on the normal range of BMD of the skeletal sites for different age, sex, and ethnic groups are compiled and made available with the devices, which gives the physician the advantage of an immediate diagnosis.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21440697     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2010.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  13 in total

1.  Bone mineral density and microarchitecture in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera.

Authors:  S Farmer; V V Shanbhogue; S Hansen; C I Stahlberg; H Vestergaard; A P Hermann; H Frederiksen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Comparison of novel DXA system, Shimazu SONIALVISION G4, with GE-Lunar PRODIGY.

Authors:  Toki Takemoto; Takeshi Oguchi; Koji Oda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) serum levels in systemic sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis patients: correlation with the Trabecular Bone Score (TBS).

Authors:  Barbara Ruaro; Andrea Casabella; Sabrina Paolino; Carmen Pizzorni; Massimo Ghio; Chiara Seriolo; Luigi Molfetta; Patrizio Odetti; Vanessa Smith; Maurizio Cutolo
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Quantitative CT Detects Undiagnosed Low Bone Mineral Density in Oncologic Patients Imaged With 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Vinh Ho; Edmund B Dosunmu; Avneesh Chhabra; Keenan Brown; Xinhui Duan; Orhan K Öz
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 7.794

6.  Physiological Factors of Female Runners With and Without Stress Fracture Histories: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Therese E Johnston; Colleen Dempsey; Frances Gilman; Ryan Tomlinson; Ann-Katrin Jacketti; Jeremy Close
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Impact of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma on Mammography and Bone Density Testing in Women.

Authors:  Rahul Garg; Usha Sambamoorthi; Xi Tan; Soumit K Basu; Treah Haggerty; Kimberly M Kelly
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2021-03-12

Review 8.  The Use of Imaging Techniques in Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorders (CKD-MBD)-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ana Pimentel; Jordi Bover; Grahame Elder; Martine Cohen-Solal; Pablo Antonio Ureña-Torres
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26

9.  Bone mineral density in university aged Saudi females.

Authors:  Lina Fahmi Hammad
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  Comparative measurements of bone mineral density and bone contrast values in canine femora using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional digital radiography.

Authors:  K Lucas; I Nolte; V Galindo-Zamora; M Lerch; C Stukenborg-Colsman; B A Behrens; A Bouguecha; S Betancur; A Almohallami; P Wefstaedt
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.