RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: During radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, the esophagus is at risk for thermal injury. In this study, C-arm computed tomography (CT) was compared to clinical CT, without the administration of oral contrast, to visualize the esophagus and its relationship to the left atrium and the ostia of the pulmonary veins (PVs) during the radiofrequency ablation procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen subjects underwent both cardiac clinical CT and C-arm CT. Computed tomographic scans were performed on a multidetector scanner using a standard electrocardiographically gated protocol. C-arm computed tomographic scans were obtained using either a multisweep protocol with retrospective electrocardiographic gating or a non-gated single-sweep protocol. C-arm and clinical computed tomographic scans were analyzed in a random order and then compared for the following criteria: (1) visualization of the esophagus (yes or no), (2) relationship of esophageal position to the four PVs, and (3) direct contact or absence of a fat pad between the esophagus and the PV antrum. RESULTS: The esophagus was identified in all C-arm and clinical computed tomographic scans. In four cases, orthogonal planes were needed on C-arm CT (inferior PV level). In six patients, the esophageal location on C-arm CT was different from that on CT. Direct contact was reported in 19 of 64 of the segments (30%) examined on CT and in 26 of 64 (41%) on C-arm CT. In five of 64 segments (8%), C-arm CT overestimated a direct contact of the esophagus to the left atrium. CONCLUSIONS: C-arm computed tomographic image quality without the administration of oral contrast agents was shown to be sufficient for visualization of the esophagus location during a radiofrequency catheter ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: During radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, the esophagus is at risk for thermal injury. In this study, C-arm computed tomography (CT) was compared to clinical CT, without the administration of oral contrast, to visualize the esophagus and its relationship to the left atrium and the ostia of the pulmonary veins (PVs) during the radiofrequency ablation procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen subjects underwent both cardiac clinical CT and C-arm CT. Computed tomographic scans were performed on a multidetector scanner using a standard electrocardiographically gated protocol. C-arm computed tomographic scans were obtained using either a multisweep protocol with retrospective electrocardiographic gating or a non-gated single-sweep protocol. C-arm and clinical computed tomographic scans were analyzed in a random order and then compared for the following criteria: (1) visualization of the esophagus (yes or no), (2) relationship of esophageal position to the four PVs, and (3) direct contact or absence of a fat pad between the esophagus and the PV antrum. RESULTS: The esophagus was identified in all C-arm and clinical computed tomographic scans. In four cases, orthogonal planes were needed on C-arm CT (inferior PV level). In six patients, the esophageal location on C-arm CT was different from that on CT. Direct contact was reported in 19 of 64 of the segments (30%) examined on CT and in 26 of 64 (41%) on C-arm CT. In five of 64 segments (8%), C-arm CT overestimated a direct contact of the esophagus to the left atrium. CONCLUSIONS: C-arm computed tomographic image quality without the administration of oral contrast agents was shown to be sufficient for visualization of the esophagus location during a radiofrequency catheter ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation.
Authors: Paul Cronin; Michael B Sneider; Ella A Kazerooni; Aine Marie Kelly; Christoph Scharf; Hakan Oral; Fred Morady Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Eric Good; Hakan Oral; Kristina Lemola; Jihn Han; Kamala Tamirisa; Petar Igic; Darryl Elmouchi; David Tschopp; Scott Reich; Aman Chugh; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-11-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jennifer E Cummings; Robert A Schweikert; Walid I Saliba; J David Burkhardt; Johannes Brachmann; Jens Gunther; Volker Schibgilla; Atul Verma; MarkAlain Dery; John L Drago; Fethi Kilicaslan; Andrea Natale Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-07-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kristina Lemola; Michael Sneider; Benoit Desjardins; Ian Case; Jihn Han; Eric Good; Kamala Tamirisa; Ariane Tsemo; Aman Chugh; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Ella Kazerooni; Fred Morady; Hakan Oral Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Damian P Redfearn; Geoffrey M Trim; Allan C Skanes; Basilios Petrellis; Andrew D Krahn; Raymond Yee; George J Klein Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2005-06
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; A Takahashi; M Hocini; G Quiniou; S Garrigue; A Le Mouroux; P Le Métayer; J Clémenty Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carlo Pappone; Hakan Oral; Vincenzo Santinelli; Gabriele Vicedomini; Christopher C Lang; Francesco Manguso; Lucia Torracca; Stefano Benussi; Ottavio Alfieri; Robert Hong; William Lau; Kirk Hirata; Neil Shikuma; Burr Hall; Fred Morady Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-05-24 Impact factor: 29.690