BACKGROUND: Phthalate and phenol exposure is prevalent among the general population and of potential concern for pregnant women and children because of their suspected susceptibility to endocrine effects. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the extent of exposure to several phthalates and phenols in a sample of Spanish pregnant women - according to their individual characteristics (age, social class, education, and body mass index) - and children who participated in the INMA - Infancia y Medio Ambiente (Environment and Childhood) project. METHODS: One spot urine sample was taken during the third trimester of pregnancy from 120 pregnant women and from 30 4-year old children belonging to 5 Spanish birth cohorts, and analyzed for 11 phthalate metabolites and 9 phenols. RESULTS: Three metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate, mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate, and mono-2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate; two metabolites of dibutyl phthalates, mono-isobutyl phthalate and mono-n-butyl phthalate; monoethyl phthalate (MEP), the main metabolite of diethyl phthalate; and two phenols, methyl paraben (M-PB) and 2,5-dichlorophenol were detected in the urine samples of all women. The highest urinary concentrations were for MEP and M-PB. Urinary concentrations of all phthalate metabolites and of 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,5-dichlorophenol, and bisphenol A were lower in the pregnant women than in the children. Among women, a positive relationship with social class and education was shown for most of the phthalate metabolites and phenols. Almost all phthalate metabolites varied by region even after adjusting for social class and education. CONCLUSIONS: Phthalate and phenol exposures are prevalent in a group of pregnant women and young children, two susceptible populations, and these exposures might be positively related to social class.
BACKGROUND:Phthalate and phenol exposure is prevalent among the general population and of potential concern for pregnant women and children because of their suspected susceptibility to endocrine effects. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the extent of exposure to several phthalates and phenols in a sample of Spanish pregnant women - according to their individual characteristics (age, social class, education, and body mass index) - and children who participated in the INMA - Infancia y Medio Ambiente (Environment and Childhood) project. METHODS: One spot urine sample was taken during the third trimester of pregnancy from 120 pregnant women and from 30 4-year old children belonging to 5 Spanish birth cohorts, and analyzed for 11 phthalate metabolites and 9 phenols. RESULTS: Three metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate, mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate, and mono-2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate; two metabolites of dibutyl phthalates, mono-isobutyl phthalate and mono-n-butyl phthalate; monoethyl phthalate (MEP), the main metabolite of diethyl phthalate; and two phenols, methyl paraben (M-PB) and 2,5-dichlorophenol were detected in the urine samples of all women. The highest urinary concentrations were for MEP and M-PB. Urinary concentrations of all phthalate metabolites and of 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,5-dichlorophenol, and bisphenol A were lower in the pregnant women than in the children. Among women, a positive relationship with social class and education was shown for most of the phthalate metabolites and phenols. Almost all phthalate metabolites varied by region even after adjusting for social class and education. CONCLUSIONS:Phthalate and phenol exposures are prevalent in a group of pregnant women and young children, two susceptible populations, and these exposures might be positively related to social class.
Authors: Elise M Philips; Leonardo Trasande; Linda G Kahn; Romy Gaillard; Eric A P Steegers; Vincent W V Jaddoe Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Arin A Balalian; Robin M Whyatt; Xinhua Liu; Beverly J Insel; Virginia A Rauh; Julie Herbstman; Pam Factor-Litvak Journal: Environ Res Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Kelly K Ferguson; John D Meeker; David E Cantonwine; Yin-Hsiu Chen; Bhramar Mukherjee; Thomas F McElrath Journal: Environ Int Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Shaina L Stacy; Melissa Eliot; Taylor Etzel; George Papandonatos; Antonia M Calafat; Aimin Chen; Russ Hauser; Bruce P Lanphear; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Xiaoyun Ye; Kimberly Yolton; Joseph M Braun Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Mary E Mortensen; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Lee-Yang Wong; David J Wright; James L Pirkle; Lori S Merrill; John Moye Journal: Environ Res Date: 2014-01-11 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Yu-Han Chiu; Carmen Messerlian; Paige L Williams; Mary E Sabatini; Thomas L Toth; Jennifer B Ford; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Joaquín R Domínguez; Maria J Muñoz-Peña; Teresa González; Patricia Palo; Eduardo M Cuerda-Correa Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2016-07-23 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Lori A Hoepner; Robin M Whyatt; Allan C Just; Antonia M Calafat; Frederica P Perera; Andrew G Rundle Journal: Environ Res Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Mei Chen; Lin Tao; Erin M Collins; Christine Austin; Chensheng Lu Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 3.205