Literature DB >> 21440289

Does timing of presentation of penile fracture affect outcome of surgical intervention?

Ahmed el-Assmy1, Hossam S el-Tholoth, Tarek Mohsen, el-Housseiny I Ibrahiem.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of timing of presentation of cases with penile fracture on the outcome of surgical intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1986 and May 2010, 180 patients with penile fracture were treated surgically in our center. To assess the effect of timing of presentation, patients were classified into 2 groups: group I with early presentation (≤24 hours) and group II with delayed presentation (>24 hours). All patients were contacted by mail or phone and were re-evaluated. All patients were reevaluated by questionnaire and local examination. Patients with erectile dysfunction were evaluated by color Doppler ultrasonography.
RESULTS: Group I included 149 patients (82.8%) and group II included 31 (17.2%). In group I, patients presented to the emergency department from 1-24 hours (mean, 11.8) after occurrence of the penile trauma. Although patients in group II presented from 30 hours to 7 days (mean, 44.7 hours). Both groups were similar regarding etiology of injury, clinical presentation, surgical findings, and incidence of associated urethral injury. Mean follow-up period for group I was 105 months, and for group II it was 113 months. After such long-term follow up, 35 (19.4%) patients had complications; however, there was no statistically significant difference between both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Cases of penile fracture with early or delayed presentation up to 7 days should be managed surgically. Both groups have comparable excellent outcome with no serious long-term complications.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21440289     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

1.  Addressing the barriers to optimal management of penile fracture.

Authors:  Anthony J Bella; Rany Shamloul
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Urotrauma: AUA guideline.

Authors:  Allen F Morey; Steve Brandes; Daniel David Dugi; John H Armstrong; Benjamin N Breyer; Joshua A Broghammer; Bradley A Erickson; Jeff Holzbeierlein; Steven J Hudak; Jeffrey H Pruitt; James T Reston; Richard A Santucci; Thomas G Smith; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Can it wait? A systematic review of immediate vs. delayed surgical repair of penile fractures.

Authors:  Nathan Colin Wong; Shawn Dason; Rahul K Bansal; Timothy O Davies; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  An update of Penile Fractures: Long-term significance of the number of hours elapsed till surgical repair on long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Zafer Kozacıoğlu; Yasin Ceylan; Özgü Aydoğdu; Deniz Bolat; Bülent Günlüsoy; Süleyman Minareci
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-01-06

5.  Delayed Successful Surgical Repair of Penile Fracture: A Case Report.

Authors:  Ioannis Galanakis; Konstantinos Adamos; Evangelos Spyropoulos; Stamatios Mavrikos
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-03-08

6.  Older age and a large tunical tear may be predictors of increased erectile dysfunction rates following penile fracture surgery.

Authors:  Mazhar Ortac; Faruk Özgor; Ufuk Caglar; Abdullah Esmeray; Metin Savun; Ömer Sarılar
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Comparison of different approaches to the surgical treatment of penile fractures: quicker return to sexual function with longitudinal incisions.

Authors:  M X Xu; Z Zhou; H J Yao; K Zhang; J Da; M Zhang; Z Wang; M J Lu
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Urethral pseudodiverticulum secondary to penile fracture and complete urethra dissection.

Authors:  Giovanni B Di Pierro; Luca Iannotta; Michele Innocenzi; Gulia Caterina; Pietro Grande; Cristiano Cristini; Vincenzo Gentile
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Sexual function outcomes following fracture of the penis.

Authors:  Gregory J Nason; Barry B McGuire; Stephen Liddy; Aisling Looney; Gerald M Lennon; David W Mulvin; David J Galvin; David M Quinlan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  Alteration in the etiology of penile fracture in the Middle East and Central Asia regions in the last decade; a literature review.

Authors:  Ahmad A Majzoub; Onder Canguven; Talib A Raidh
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.