Literature DB >> 21439537

One-year results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.

Michael Gotzmann1, Waldemar Bojara, Michael Lindstaedt, Aydan Ewers, Leif Bösche, Alfried Germing, Thomas Lawo, Matthias Bechtel, Axel Laczkovics, Andreas Mügge.   

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative therapy for symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis in high-risk patients with several co-morbidities. We evaluated the 1-year effects of TAVI on quality of life, exercise capacity, neurohormonal activation, and myocardial hypertrophy. From June 2008 to October 2009, consecutive patients aged ≥75 years with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis (area <1 cm(2)) and a logistic euroSCORE ≥15% or aged >60 years with additional specified risk factors underwent TAVI. An aortic valve prosthesis (CoreValve) was inserted in a retrograde fashion. Examinations were performed before and 30 days and 1 year after TAVI. An assessment of the quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire), a 6-minute walking test, measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide, and echocardiography were performed. In 51 patients (mean age 78 ± 6.6 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 58.4 ± 12.2%), the follow-up examinations were performed after TAVI. The 1-year follow-up visit after TAVI revealed significantly improved quality of life (baseline Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score 39.6 ± 19 vs 26.1 ± 18, p <0.001) and more distance covered in the 6-minute walking test (baseline 185 ± 106 vs 266 ± 118 m, p <0.001). The B-type natriuretic peptide level had decreased (baseline 642 ± 634 vs 323 ± 266 pg/ml, p <0.001), and the left ventricular mass index had decreased (156 ± 45 vs 130 ± 42 g/m(2), p <0.001). The left ventricular diameter and ejection fraction remained unchanged. In conclusion, TAVI leads to significantly reduced neurohormonal activation, regression of myocardial hypertrophy, and lasting enhancement of quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with symptomatic and severe aortic stenosis 1 year after intervention.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21439537     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  16 in total

1.  Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement International Registry (SU-AVR-IR): design and rationale from the International Valvular Surgery Study Group (IVSSG).

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Kevin Phan; Denis Bouchard; Thierry P Carrel; Otto E Dapunt; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Harald C Eichstaedt; Theodor Fischlein; Thierry Folliguet; Borut Gersak; Mattia Glauber; Axel Haverich; Martin Misfeld; Peter J Oberwalder; Giuseppe Santarpino; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Marco Vola; Francesco Alamanni; Alberto Albertini; Gopal Bhatnagar; Michel Carrier; Stephen Clark; Federic Collart; Utz Kappert; Alfred Kocher; Bart Meuris; Carmelo Mignosa; Ahmed Ouda; Marc Pelletier; Parwis Baradaran Rahmanian; David Reineke; Kevin Teoh; Giovanni Troise; Emmanuel Villa; Thorsten Wahlers; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Paravalvular regurgitation following transcutaneous aortic valve replacement: predictors and clinical significance.

Authors:  Rebecca T Hahn; Susheel Kodali; Philippe Généreux; Martin Leon
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Health-related quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: an updated review of literature.

Authors:  Saurav Chatterjee; Dharam Jaydeep Kumbhani; Partha Sardar; Anasua Chakraborty; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Manpreet Singh Sabharwal; Richard Ro; Balaji Pratap; Chirag P Bavishi; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches.

Authors:  Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the elderly: who to refer?

Authors:  Matthew Finn; Philip Green
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 8.194

6.  Comparison of early clinical outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement versus optimal medical therapy in patients older than 80 years with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Eui Im; Myeong-Ki Hong; Young-Guk Ko; Dong-Ho Shin; Jung-Sun Kim; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Donghoon Choi; Chi Young Shim; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Jae-Kwang Shim; Young-Lan Kwak; Sak Lee; Byung-Chul Chang; Yangsoo Jang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Patient experiences of recovery after heart valve replacement: suffering weakness, struggling to resume normality.

Authors:  Selina Kikkenborg Berg; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Birthe D Pedersen; Katrine Haase; Kirstine Lærum Sibilitz
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2013-09-26

Review 8.  Beyond adding years to life: health-related quality-of-life and functional outcomes in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at high surgical risk undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Marcus-Andre Deutsch; Sabine Bleiziffer; Yacine Elhmidi; Nicolo Piazza; Bernhard Voss; Ruediger Lange; Markus Krane
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2013-11

Review 9.  Functional status and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline A Kim; Suraj P Rasania; Jonathan Afilalo; Jeffrey J Popma; Lewis A Lipsitz; Dae Hyun Kim
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  A review of most relevant complications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab; Robert E Michler
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.