Literature DB >> 21439185

How people present symptoms to health services: a theory-based content analysis.

Barbara Farquharson1, Marie Johnston, Carol Bugge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: How people present symptoms to health services may influence the care they subsequently receive. Leventhal's Commonsense Model of Self-Regulation (CS-SRM) posits that individuals develop cognitive illness representations elaborated around five main components (identity, timeline, cause, consequences, and cure/control), coherence, and emotional representations. AIM: To examine whether initial presentations to health services consist of the components of illness representation proposed by the CS-SRM. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A CS-SRM-based content analysis of calls to the Scottish national telephone advice service, NHS 24.
METHOD: A random sample of callers to NHS 24 was identified. A quota sample of 60 consented to participate. Their consultations were transcribed verbatim. Responses to an initial open question regarding the reason for calling were identified and divided into 'meaning units'. A coding schedule was developed using Leventhal's definitions of illness representations. Meaning units were coded independently by two researchers.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine eligible initial presentations contained between 1 and 13 coding units, (mean = 4). A total of 230 coding units were available for coding. Overall, 202 (88%) coding units were coded to at least one component of illness representation. All 59 (100%) participants made reference to identity, 26 (44%) to timeline, nine (15%) to cause, eight (14%) to consequences, 22 (37%) to cure/control, and 11 (19%) to the degree of coherence. Emotional representations were identified in six (10%) participants' presentations.
CONCLUSION: Leventhal's CS-SRM accounts for a large proportion of initial presentations to health services. Most people offer identity plus at least one additional component of illness representation. It may be necessary for clinicians to prompt remaining components to obtain a comprehensive understanding of patients' representations of illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21439185      PMCID: PMC3063016          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X567090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  6 in total

1.  The motivating impact of informing women smokers of a link between smoking and cervical cancer: the role of coherence.

Authors:  Sue Hall; John Weinman; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  The significance for decision-making of information that is not exchanged by patients and health professionals during consultations.

Authors:  Carol Bugge; Vikki A Entwistle; Ian S Watt
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Sequenced questioning to elicit the patient's perspective on illness: effects on information disclosure, patient satisfaction, and time expenditure.

Authors:  Forrest Lang; Michael R Floyd; Kathleen L B Beine; Patricia Buck
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Further explorations of common-sense representations of common illnesses.

Authors:  R R Lau; T M Bernard; K A Hartman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Assessing patients' beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation as a basis for predicting attendance after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A F Cooper; J Weinman; M Hankins; G Jackson; R Horne
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Does training general practitioners to elicit patients' illness representations and action plans influence their communication as a whole?

Authors:  Denise T D de Ridder; Nicolet C M Theunissen; Sandra M van Dulmen
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-03-06
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Relation between illness representation and self-reported degree-of-worry in patients calling out-of-hours services: a mixed-methods study in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Authors:  Sita LeBlanc Thilsted; Ingrid Egerod; Freddy Knudsen Lippert; Hejdi Gamst-Jensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.