Literature DB >> 16790305

The significance for decision-making of information that is not exchanged by patients and health professionals during consultations.

Carol Bugge1, Vikki A Entwistle, Ian S Watt.   

Abstract

Information exchange between patients and health professionals is fundamental to achieving patient participation in decision-making and shared decision-making is said to require the exchange of "all information relevant to decision-making". This paper reports on a qualitative investigation of instances in which information that was potentially relevant to decision-making was not exchanged in consultations. Consultations from 5 diverse clinical areas in the UK were video-recorded and the health professionals and patients involved were interviewed separately before and after their consultations. This analysis is based on cases involving 20 patients. It draws on data from their 26-recorded consultations and from the 137 associated interviews. Several strategies were used to identify instances in which patients and/or health professionals did not disclose information that was potentially relevant to decision-making. Analysis focussed on the types of information not disclosed, the reasons that health professionals and patients gave for non-disclosure, and the apparent or potential significance of the non-disclosure. We identified 34 instances of non-disclosure of information relating to the patient's problem and 52 instances of non-disclosure of information relating to treatment or management options. The types of information not disclosed were diverse and the reasons given for non-disclosure varied. Some, but not all, instances of non-disclosure had negative implications for the quality of decision-making and/or the patient's healthcare experience. Our findings have implications for future attempts to examine information exchange in consultations-whether for research or for professional assessment purposes. In particular, they highlight the importance of appraising instances of non-disclosure of information in context and of recognising the limitations of approaches that rely on single consultations and/or single perspectives for assessments of information exchange.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16790305     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  17 in total

1.  Patient participation in the discussions of options in Spanish primary care consultations.

Authors:  Roger Ruiz Moral; Lucía Peralta Munguía; Luis Ángel Pérula de Torres; Maria Teresa Carrión; Jorge Olloqui Mundet; Mariana Martínez
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  How does decision complexity affect shared decision making? An analysis of patient-provider antiretroviral initiation dialogue.

Authors:  Wynne Callon; Somnath Saha; Ira B Wilson; Michael Barton Laws; Michele Massa; P Todd Korthuis; Victoria Sharp; Jonathan Cohn; Richard D Moore; Mary Catherine Beach
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-12-16

3.  How people present symptoms to health services: a theory-based content analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Farquharson; Marie Johnston; Carol Bugge
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Something in nothing: negative space in the clinician-patient relationship.

Authors:  Stephen A Buetow
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Are parents and professionals making shared decisions about a child's care on presentation of a suspected shunt malfunction: a mixed method study?

Authors:  Joanna Smith; Francine Cheater; Hilary Bekker; John Chatwin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  What Latina patients don't tell their doctors: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kell Julliard; Josefina Vivar; Carlos Delgado; Eugenio Cruz; Jennifer Kabak; Heidi Sabers
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Evaluation of a web portal for improving public access to evidence-based health information and health literacy skills: a pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren; Arild Bjørndal; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Sølvi Helseth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Development of a complex intervention to improve health literacy skills.

Authors:  Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren; Stein Danielsen; Elin Opheim; Arild Bjørndal; Liv Merete Reinar; Signe Flottorp; Andrew David Oxman; Sølvi Helseth
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2013-07-31

9.  The effect of a decision aid intervention on decision making about coronary heart disease risk reduction: secondary analyses of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Lindy B Draeger; Michael P Pignone; Barbara Rimer; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Jianwen Cai; Ziya Gizlice; Thomas C Keyserling; Ross J Simpson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Getting under the skin of the primary care consultation using video stimulated recall: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zoe Paskins; Gretl McHugh; Andrew B Hassell
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.