Peter Schofield1, Omer Saka, Mark Ashworth. 1. Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK. peter.1.schofield@kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High blood pressure is the single most important risk factor worldwide for the development of cardiovascular disease, and has been shown to affect some ethnic minority groups disproportionately. AIM: To explore ethnic inequalities in blood pressure monitoring and control. METHOD: Data from Lambeth DataNet was used, based on case records from GP practices in one inner-city London borough. Blood pressure monitoring and control was compared using Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) targets for patients with: diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. The study controlled for age, sex, social deprivation, and clustering within GP practices. RESULTS: A total of 16 613 patients met the study criteria, with 5962 categorised as black/black British. Blood pressure monitoring was similar across ethnic groups and as good, if not better, for black patients compared to white. However, marked ethnic inequalities in blood pressure control were found, with black patients significantly less likely to achieve QOF targets than their white counterparts (odds ratio [OR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64 to 0.82). Further inequalities were revealed in blood pressure control within disease groups and ethnic subgroups. In particular, blood pressure control was poor in African patients with diabetes (OR 0.63; 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.79) and Caribbean patients with coronary heart disease (OR 0.53; 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.77) when compared with white patients. DISCUSSION: While black patients with chronic conditions are equally likely to have their blood pressure monitored, their blood pressure control is consistently poorer than that of their white counterparts. This may have important implications for cardiovascular risk management in black patients.
BACKGROUND: High blood pressure is the single most important risk factor worldwide for the development of cardiovascular disease, and has been shown to affect some ethnic minority groups disproportionately. AIM: To explore ethnic inequalities in blood pressure monitoring and control. METHOD: Data from Lambeth DataNet was used, based on case records from GP practices in one inner-city London borough. Blood pressure monitoring and control was compared using Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) targets for patients with: diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. The study controlled for age, sex, social deprivation, and clustering within GP practices. RESULTS: A total of 16 613 patients met the study criteria, with 5962 categorised as black/black British. Blood pressure monitoring was similar across ethnic groups and as good, if not better, for black patients compared to white. However, marked ethnic inequalities in blood pressure control were found, with black patients significantly less likely to achieve QOF targets than their white counterparts (odds ratio [OR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64 to 0.82). Further inequalities were revealed in blood pressure control within disease groups and ethnic subgroups. In particular, blood pressure control was poor in African patients with diabetes (OR 0.63; 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.79) and Caribbean patients with coronary heart disease (OR 0.53; 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.77) when compared with white patients. DISCUSSION: While black patients with chronic conditions are equally likely to have their blood pressure monitored, their blood pressure control is consistently poorer than that of their white counterparts. This may have important implications for cardiovascular risk management in black patients.
Authors: Majid Ezzati; Alan D Lopez; Anthony Rodgers; Stephen Vander Hoorn; Christopher J L Murray Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-11-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Khatundi-Irene Masindi; Nathaniel Jembere; Claire E Kendall; Ann N Burchell; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Mona Loutfy; Janet Raboud; Sean B Rourke; Henry Luyombya; Tony Antoniou Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2018-06
Authors: Massimo F Piepoli; Arno W Hoes; Stefan Agewall; Christian Albus; Carlos Brotons; Alberico L Catapano; Marie-Therese Cooney; Ugo Corrà; Bernard Cosyns; Christi Deaton; Ian Graham; Michael Stephen Hall; F D Richard Hobbs; Maja-Lisa Løchen; Herbert Löllgen; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Joep Perk; Eva Prescott; Josep Redon; Dimitrios J Richter; Naveed Sattar; Yvo Smulders; Monica Tiberi; H Bart van der Worp; Ineke van Dis; W M Monique Verschuren; Simone Binno Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Luís Alves; Ana Azevedo; Henrique Barros; Peter Vollenweider; Gérard Waeber; Pedro Marques-Vidal Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jennita G Meinema; Nynke van Dijk; Erik J A J Beune; Debbie A D C Jaarsma; Henk C P M van Weert; Joke A Haafkens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Martin B Whyte; William Hinton; Andrew McGovern; Jeremy van Vlymen; Filipa Ferreira; Silvio Calderara; Julie Mount; Neil Munro; Simon de Lusignan Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-10-07 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Carole H Sudre; Lorna Smith; David Atkinson; Nish Chaturvedi; Sébastien Ourselin; Frederik Barkhof; Alun D Hughes; H Rolf Jäger; M Jorge Cardoso Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 5.501