OBJECTIVES: To compare attitudes toward dementia screening of older adults with and without an experience of dementia caregiving. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care clinics in Indianapolis, Indiana. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one participants with dementia caregiving experience (CG) and a random sample of 125 participants without dementia caregiving experience (NCG). MEASUREMENTS: Attitudes of dementia screening, including acceptance of dementia screening and its perceived harms and benefits, as determined according to the Perceptions Regarding Investigational Screening for Memory in Primary Care questionnaire. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, race, sex, and education, CGs had a lower dementia screening acceptance mean score (53.9 vs 60.6; P=.03) and a higher perceived suffering score (61.6 vs 55.9, P=.04) than NCGs, but there were no differences in perceived benefits of dementia screening (72.8 vs 69.0; P=.50), perceived stigma (32.9 vs 37.5; P=.12), and perceived negative effect on independence (47.6 vs 54.0; P=.20). The top three barriers to screening identified by both groups were emotional suffering by the family (86% of CGs and 75% of NCGs), loss of driving privileges (75% of CGs and 78% of NCGs), and becoming depressed (64% of CGs and 43% of NCGs). CONCLUSION: The experience of being a dementia caregiver may influence one's own attitude about accepting dementia screening for oneself.
OBJECTIVES: To compare attitudes toward dementia screening of older adults with and without an experience of dementia caregiving. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care clinics in Indianapolis, Indiana. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one participants with dementia caregiving experience (CG) and a random sample of 125 participants without dementia caregiving experience (NCG). MEASUREMENTS: Attitudes of dementia screening, including acceptance of dementia screening and its perceived harms and benefits, as determined according to the Perceptions Regarding Investigational Screening for Memory in Primary Care questionnaire. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, race, sex, and education, CGs had a lower dementia screening acceptance mean score (53.9 vs 60.6; P=.03) and a higher perceived suffering score (61.6 vs 55.9, P=.04) than NCGs, but there were no differences in perceived benefits of dementia screening (72.8 vs 69.0; P=.50), perceived stigma (32.9 vs 37.5; P=.12), and perceived negative effect on independence (47.6 vs 54.0; P=.20). The top three barriers to screening identified by both groups were emotional suffering by the family (86% of CGs and 75% of NCGs), loss of driving privileges (75% of CGs and 78% of NCGs), and becoming depressed (64% of CGs and 43% of NCGs). CONCLUSION: The experience of being a dementia caregiver may influence one's own attitude about accepting dementia screening for oneself.
Authors: Cleusa P Ferri; Martin Prince; Carol Brayne; Henry Brodaty; Laura Fratiglioni; Mary Ganguli; Kathleen Hall; Kazuo Hasegawa; Hugh Hendrie; Yueqin Huang; Anthony Jorm; Colin Mathers; Paulo R Menezes; Elizabeth Rimmer; Marcia Scazufca Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James E Galvin; Qiang Fu; Joseph T Nguyen; Cristie Glasheen; Darcell P Scharff Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Malaz Boustani; Anthony J Perkins; Chris Fox; Fred Unverzagt; Mary Guerriero Austrom; Bridget Fultz; Siu Hui; Christopher M Callahan; Hugh C Hendrie Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Malaz Boustani; Anthony J Perkins; Patrick Monahan; Chris Fox; Lea Watson; John Hopkins; Bridget Fultz; Siu Hui; Frederick W Unverzagt; Christopher M Callahan; Hugh C Hendrie Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Michael D Justiss; Malaz Boustani; Chris Fox; Cornelius Katona; Anthony J Perkins; Patrick J Healey; Greg Sachs; Siu Hui; Christopher M Callahan; Hugh C Hendrie; Emma Scott Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Cathy C Schubert; Malaz Boustani; Christopher M Callahan; Anthony J Perkins; Siu Hui; Hugh C Hendrie Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-08-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Mehrdad Razavi; Magdalena I Tolea; Jennifer Margrett; Peter Martin; Andrew Oakland; David W Tscholl; Sarah Ghods; Mazdak Mina; James E Galvin Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2014 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Soo Borson; Lori Frank; Peter J Bayley; Malaz Boustani; Marge Dean; Pei-Jung Lin; J Riley McCarten; John C Morris; David P Salmon; Frederick A Schmitt; Richard G Stefanacci; Marta S Mendiondo; Susan Peschin; Eric J Hall; Howard Fillit; J Wesson Ashford Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Nicole R Fowler; Anthony J Perkins; Sujuan Gao; Greg A Sachs; Malaz A Boustani Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Woojung Lee; Shelly L Gray; Oleg Zaslavsky; Douglas Barthold; Zachary A Marcum Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Nicole R Fowler; Amie Frame; Anthony J Perkins; Sujuan Gao; Dennis P Watson; Patrick Monahan; Malaz A Boustani Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2015-06