Literature DB >> 21436756

The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children.

Jace Wolfe1, Erin C Schafer, Andrew John, Mary Hudson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous research shows that children using cochlear implants experience significant difficulty with speech perception in noisy listening situations. There are several types of input signal processing available for the cochlear implant sound processor; however, there is a paucity of research to support this technology for children. The primary objective of this study was to examine the potential benefits of 2 types of input signal processing, adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) as compared with autosensitivity (ASC) plus ADRO for children using Cochlear Corporation implants. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Cross-sectional repeated-measures design.
SETTING: Outpatient nonprofit foundation providing audiology services and auditory-verbal therapy. PATIENTS: Eleven children, aged 4 years 4 months to 12 years, with unilateral or bilateral Cochlear Limited implants. All children used their cochlear implant(s) for at least 1 year, had no additional disabilities, were enrolled in preschool or elementary school, and had age-appropriate receptive and expressive language. INTERVENTION: All children used Cochlear Limited cochlear implants with either the Nucleus Freedom or Nucleus 5 cochlear implant sound processor. Performance was assessed while these children used ADRO-only input processing and ASC+ADRO input processing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception of PBK-50 monosyllabic words in quiet and BKB-SIN sentences in noise was measured for each child. In the noise conditions, children were using the ADRO-only or ASC+ADRO input signal processing strategies. The data in quiet were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and the conditions in noise were compared using a 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance.
RESULTS: All children demonstrated word recognition in quiet at or above 90% correct. In noise, sentence-perception performance in the ASC+ADRO condition was significantly better than that in the ADRO-alone condition.
CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest substantial benefit from combining 2 types of input signal processing, ASC and ADRO, for children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Specifically, signal processing to adjust the sensitivity of the sound processor microphone automatically has substantial positive effects on speech-perception thresholds in noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21436756     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318210b6ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

1.  The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Bernadette Rakszawski; Rose Wright; Jamie H Cadieux; Lisa S Davidson; Christine Brenner
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Louise Loiselle; Sarah Natale; Sterling W Sheffield; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Mary S Dietrich; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The effect of automatic gain control structure and release time on cochlear implant speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Phyu P Khing; Brett A Swanson; Eliathamby Ambikairajah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A clinical assessment of cochlear implant recipient performance: implications for individualized map settings in specific environments.

Authors:  Matthias Hey; Thomas Hocke; Stefan Mauger; Joachim Müller-Deile
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Wendy B Potts; Lakshmish Ramanna; Trevor Perry; Christopher J Long
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Listening to Music Through Hearing Aids: Potential Lessons for Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

7.  Pediatric Evaluation of the ClearVoice™ Speech Enhancement Algorithm in Everyday Life.

Authors:  Nathalie Noël-Petroff; Nathalie Mathias; Cécile Ulmann; Thierry Van Den Abbeele
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2013-12-11

8.  Electroacoustic verification of frequency modulation systems in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Vanessa Luisa Destro Fidêncio; Regina Tangerino de Souza Jacob; Liége Franzini Tanamati; Érika Cristina Bucuvic; Adriane Lima Mortari Moret
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.