BACKGROUND: Religious (R) and spiritual (S) beliefs often affect patients' health care decisions, particularly with regard to care at the end of life. Furthermore, patients desire more R/S involvement by the medical community; however, physicians typically do not incorporate R/S assessment into medical interviews with patients. The effects of physicians' R/S beliefs on willingness to participate in controversial clinical practices such as medical abortions and physician-assisted suicide has been evaluated, but how a physician's R/S beliefs may affect other medical decision-making is unclear. METHODS: Using SurveyMonkey, an online survey tool, we surveyed 1972 members of the International Gynecologic Oncologists Society and the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists to determine the R/S characteristics of gynecologic oncologists and whether their R/S beliefs affected their clinical practice. Demographics, religiosity, and spirituality data were collected. Physicians were also asked to evaluate 5 complex case scenarios. RESULTS: : Two hundred seventy-three (14%) physicians responded. Sixty percent "agreed" or "somewhat agreed" that their R/S beliefs were a source of personal comfort. Forty-five percent reported that their R/S beliefs ("sometimes," "frequently," or "always") play a role in the medical options they offered patients, but only 34% "frequently" or "always" take a R/S history from patients. Interestingly, 90% reported that they consider patients' R/S beliefs when discussing end-of-life issues. Responses to case scenarios largely differed by years of experience, although age and R/S beliefs also had influence. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that gynecologic oncologists' R/S beliefs may affect patient care but that most physicians fail to take an R/S history from their patients. More work needs to be done to evaluate possible barriers that prevent physicians from taking a spiritual history and engaging in discussions over these matters with patients.
BACKGROUND: Religious (R) and spiritual (S) beliefs often affect patients' health care decisions, particularly with regard to care at the end of life. Furthermore, patients desire more R/S involvement by the medical community; however, physicians typically do not incorporate R/S assessment into medical interviews with patients. The effects of physicians' R/S beliefs on willingness to participate in controversial clinical practices such as medical abortions and physician-assisted suicide has been evaluated, but how a physician's R/S beliefs may affect other medical decision-making is unclear. METHODS: Using SurveyMonkey, an online survey tool, we surveyed 1972 members of the International Gynecologic Oncologists Society and the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists to determine the R/S characteristics of gynecologic oncologists and whether their R/S beliefs affected their clinical practice. Demographics, religiosity, and spirituality data were collected. Physicians were also asked to evaluate 5 complex case scenarios. RESULTS: : Two hundred seventy-three (14%) physicians responded. Sixty percent "agreed" or "somewhat agreed" that their R/S beliefs were a source of personal comfort. Forty-five percent reported that their R/S beliefs ("sometimes," "frequently," or "always") play a role in the medical options they offered patients, but only 34% "frequently" or "always" take a R/S history from patients. Interestingly, 90% reported that they consider patients' R/S beliefs when discussing end-of-life issues. Responses to case scenarios largely differed by years of experience, although age and R/S beliefs also had influence. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that gynecologic oncologists' R/S beliefs may affect patient care but that most physicians fail to take an R/S history from their patients. More work needs to be done to evaluate possible barriers that prevent physicians from taking a spiritual history and engaging in discussions over these matters with patients.
Authors: Patricia Ruopp; Mary-Jo Delvecchio Good; Matthew Lakoma; Nina M Gadmer; Robert M Arnold; Susan D Block Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Michael H Monroe; Deborah Bynum; Beth Susi; Nancy Phifer; Linda Schultz; Mark Franco; Charles D MacLean; Sam Cykert; Joanne Garrett Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003 Dec 8-22
Authors: L M Ramondetta; G Tortolero-Luna; D C Bodurka; D Sills; K Basen-Engquist; J Gano; C Levenback Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: C Villain; H Wyen; S Ganzera; G Marjanovic; R Lefering; J Ansorg; P W Gaidzik; N Haubold; E A Neugebauer Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Margaret Ragland; Katrina F Trivers; C Holly A Andrilla; Barbara Matthews; Jacqueline Miller; Denise Lishner; Barbara Goff; Laura-Mae Baldwin Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Lois M Ramondetta; Charlotte Sun; Antonella Surbone; Ian Olver; Carla Ripamonti; Tatsuya Konishi; Lea Baider; Judith Johnson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 3.603