Literature DB >> 21435822

In situ leg length measurement technique in hip arthroplasty.

William B Kurtz.   

Abstract

In situ femoral preparation refers to implanting a femoral component before the femoral neck osteotomy and without dislocating the hip joint, which allows the implanted femoral component to be used to measure leg length and offset. One hundred hip arthroplasty surgeries among 93 patients were compared with a control group of 15 patients. A modular neck femoral component was implanted in a technique similar to implanting a femoral nail. The differences between the in situ measurements and the preoperative and postoperative radiograph measurements averaged -0.1 mm for leg length (r = 0.89) and -0.37 mm for offset (r = 0.57). In situ leg length measurement allows accurate measurement of leg length and offset and guides surgeons in selecting appropriate modular components to attain a near anatomical hip arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21435822     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  Accuracy of the Horizontal Calibrator in Correcting Leg Length and Restoring Femoral Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xing Chen; Shuxing Xing; Zhiyong Zhu; Huisheng Wang; Zhongshen Yu; Xizhuang Bai; Xi Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-03

2.  Intraoperative measurement of limb lengthening during total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dimitrios Vasileiou Papadopoulos; Panagiotis Koulouvaris; Georgios Charalambos Aggelidakis; Andreas Georgios Tsantes; Marios Georgios Lykissas; Alexandros Mavrodontidis
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  A Smart Tool for Intraoperative Leg Length Targeting in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Paul Grosso; Matthew Snider; Jeffrey M Muir
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-09-30

4.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Radiological Outcomes and Bone Remodeling Outcomes Between Proximal Coated Single-Wedge New Stem and Full Coated Dual-Wedge Classic Stem in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hongpeng Hu; Zeming Liu; Bo Liu; Xuzhuang Ding; Sikai Liu; Tao Wu; Wenhui Ma; Yongtai Han
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-01-31

5.  Letter to the Editor, "Who Restores Hip Biomechanics More Effectively After a Femoral Neck Fracture? Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasties Performed by Either Hip Surgeons or Orthopedic Residents".

Authors:  William F Sherman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-01-30

6.  Leg length measures appear inaccurate in the early phase following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maria Anna Smolle; Stefan Franz Fischerauer; Michael Maier; Patrick Reinbacher; Jörg Friesenbichler; Paul Ruckenstuhl; Maria Grandesso; Andreas Leithner; Werner Maurer-Ertl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparison of collum femoris-preserving stems and ribbed stems in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mingqing Li; Can Xu; Jie Xie; Yihe Hu; Hua Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.