PURPOSE: We have recently reported that ultrasound imaging, together with ultrasound tissue characterization (UTC), can provide quantitative assessment of radiation-induced normal-tissue toxicity. This study's purpose is to evaluate the reliability of our quantitative ultrasound technology in assessing acute and late normal-tissue toxicity in breast cancer radiotherapy. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Our ultrasound technique analyzes radiofrequency echo signals and provides quantitative measures of dermal, hypodermal, and glandular tissue toxicities. To facilitate easy clinical implementation, we further refined this technique by developing a semiautomatic ultrasound-based toxicity assessment tool (UBTAT). Seventy-two ultrasound studies of 26 patients (720 images) were analyzed. Images of 8 patients were evaluated for acute toxicity (<6 months postradiotherapy) and those of 18 patients were evaluated for late toxicity (≥ 6 months postradiotherapy). All patients were treated according to a standard radiotherapy protocol. To assess intraobserver reliability, one observer analyzed 720 images in UBTAT and then repeated the analysis 3 months later. To assess interobserver reliability, three observers (two radiation oncologists and one ultrasound expert) each analyzed 720 images in UBTAT. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate intra- and interobserver reliability. Ultrasound assessment and clinical evaluation were also compared. RESULTS: Intraobserver ICC was 0.89 for dermal toxicity, 0.74 for hypodermal toxicity, and 0.96 for glandular tissue toxicity. Interobserver ICC was 0.78 for dermal toxicity, 0.74 for hypodermal toxicity, and 0.94 for glandular tissue toxicity. Statistical analysis found significant changes in dermal (p < 0.0001), hypodermal (p = 0.0027), and glandular tissue (p < 0.0001) assessments in the acute toxicity group. Ultrasound measurements correlated with clinical Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity scores of patients in the late toxicity group. Patients with RTOG Grade 1 or 2 had greater ultrasound-assessed toxicity percentage changes than patients with RTOG Grade 0. CONCLUSION: Early and late radiation-induced effects on normal tissue can be reliably assessed using quantitative ultrasound.
PURPOSE: We have recently reported that ultrasound imaging, together with ultrasound tissue characterization (UTC), can provide quantitative assessment of radiation-induced normal-tissue toxicity. This study's purpose is to evaluate the reliability of our quantitative ultrasound technology in assessing acute and late normal-tissue toxicity in breast cancer radiotherapy. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Our ultrasound technique analyzes radiofrequency echo signals and provides quantitative measures of dermal, hypodermal, and glandular tissue toxicities. To facilitate easy clinical implementation, we further refined this technique by developing a semiautomatic ultrasound-based toxicity assessment tool (UBTAT). Seventy-two ultrasound studies of 26 patients (720 images) were analyzed. Images of 8 patients were evaluated for acute toxicity (<6 months postradiotherapy) and those of 18 patients were evaluated for late toxicity (≥ 6 months postradiotherapy). All patients were treated according to a standard radiotherapy protocol. To assess intraobserver reliability, one observer analyzed 720 images in UBTAT and then repeated the analysis 3 months later. To assess interobserver reliability, three observers (two radiation oncologists and one ultrasound expert) each analyzed 720 images in UBTAT. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate intra- and interobserver reliability. Ultrasound assessment and clinical evaluation were also compared. RESULTS: Intraobserver ICC was 0.89 for dermal toxicity, 0.74 for hypodermal toxicity, and 0.96 for glandular tissue toxicity. Interobserver ICC was 0.78 for dermal toxicity, 0.74 for hypodermal toxicity, and 0.94 for glandular tissue toxicity. Statistical analysis found significant changes in dermal (p < 0.0001), hypodermal (p = 0.0027), and glandular tissue (p < 0.0001) assessments in the acute toxicity group. Ultrasound measurements correlated with clinical Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity scores of patients in the late toxicity group. Patients with RTOG Grade 1 or 2 had greater ultrasound-assessed toxicity percentage changes than patients with RTOG Grade 0. CONCLUSION: Early and late radiation-induced effects on normal tissue can be reliably assessed using quantitative ultrasound.
Authors: Soren M Bentzen; Wolfgang Dörr; Mitchell S Anscher; James W Denham; Martin Hauer-Jensen; Lawrence B Marks; Jacqueline Williams Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: Tian Liu; Jun Zhou; Emi J Yoshida; Shermian A Woodhouse; Peter B Schiff; Tony J C Wang; Zheng Feng Lu; Eliza Pile-Spellman; Pengpeng Zhang; Gerald J Kutcher Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J R Bellon; K L Lindsley; G K Ellis; J R Gralow; R B Livingston; M M Austin Seymour Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: C Vrieling; L Collette; E Bartelink; J H Borger; S J Brenninkmeyer; J C Horiot; M Pierart; P M Poortmans; H Struikmans; E Van der Schueren; J A Van Dongen; E Van Limbergen; H Bartelink Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Peter Y Chen; Michelle Wallace; Christina Mitchell; Inga Grills; Larry Kestin; Ashley Fowler; Alvaro Martinez; Frank Vicini Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-06-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Sandra Collette; Laurence Collette; Tom Budiharto; Jean-Claude Horiot; Philip M Poortmans; Henk Struikmans; Walter Van den Bogaert; Alain Fourquet; Jos J Jager; Willem Hoogenraad; Rolf-Peter Mueller; John Kurtz; David A L Morgan; Jean-Bernard Dubois; Emile Salamon; Rene Mirimanoff; Michel Bolla; Marleen Van der Hulst; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Harry Bartelink Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Y Huang; J Sanz; N Rodríguez; X Duran; A Martínez; X Li; P Foro; M Conde; M Zhao; F Liu; A Reig; J Dengra; I Membrive; P Pérez; M Algara Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 3.340
Authors: Andy Evans; Yee Ting Sim; Brooke Lawson; Jane Macaskill; Lee Jordan; Alastair Thompson Journal: Breast Cancer Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 4.239
Authors: Wen Ling Choong; Andrew Evans; Colin A Purdie; Huan Wang; Peter T Donnan; Brooke Lawson; E Jane Macaskill Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 3.039