Literature DB >> 19515514

Four-year efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity using three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Peter Y Chen1, Michelle Wallace, Christina Mitchell, Inga Grills, Larry Kestin, Ashley Fowler, Alvaro Martinez, Frank Vicini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective study examines the use of three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT) to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Four-year data on efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity are presented.
METHODS: Patients with Stage O, I, or II breast cancer with lesions </=3 cm, negative margins, and negative nodes were eligible. The 3D-CRT delivered was 38.5 Gy in 3.85 Gy/fraction. Ipsilateral breast, ipsilateral nodal, contralateral breast, and distant failure (IBF, INF, CBF, DF) were estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Disease-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival (DFS, OS, CSS) were recorded. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3) toxicity scale was used to grade acute and late toxicities.
RESULTS: Ninety-four patients are evaluable for efficacy. Median patient age was 62 years with the following characteristics: 68% tumor size <1 cm, 72% invasive ductal histology, 77% estrogen receptor (ER) (+), 88% postmenopausal; 88% no chemotherapy and 44% with no hormone therapy. Median follow-up was 4.2 years (range, 1.3-8.3). Four-year estimates of efficacy were IBF: 1.1% (one local recurrence); INF: 0%; CBF: 1.1%; DF: 3.9%; DFS: 95%; OS: 97%; and CSS: 99%. Four (4%) Grade 3 toxicities (one transient breast pain and three fibrosis) were observed. Cosmesis was rated good/excellent in 89% of patients at 4 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Four-year efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity using 3D-CRT to deliver APBI appear comparable to other experiences with similar follow-up. However, additional patients, further follow-up, and mature Phase III data are needed to evaluate thoroughly the extent of application, limitations, and complete value of this particular form of APBI. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19515514     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  29 in total

Review 1.  Hypofractionated radiation therapy in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Gary M Freedman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Analysis of fat necrosis after adjuvant high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Adam A Garsa; Daniel J Ferraro; Todd Dewees; Julie A Margenthaler; Michael Naughton; Rebecca Aft; William E Gillanders; Timothy Eberlein; Melissa A Matesa; Imran Zoberi
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Quantitative ultrasonic evaluation of radiation-induced late tissue toxicity: pilot study of breast cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Jun Zhou; Emi J Yoshida; Shermian A Woodhouse; Peter B Schiff; Tony J C Wang; Zheng Feng Lu; Eliza Pile-Spellman; Pengpeng Zhang; Gerald J Kutcher
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Set-up uncertainty during breast radiotherapy. Image-guided radiotherapy for patients with initial extensive variation.

Authors:  D S Yang; W S Yoon; S Y Chung; J A Lee; S Lee; Y J Park; C Y Kim; G S Son
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  Recent developments and best practice in brachytherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  C D Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Implementation of image-guided intensity-modulated accelerated partial breast irradiation : Three-year results of a phase II clinical study.

Authors:  Norbert Mészáros; Tibor Major; Gábor Stelczer; Zoltán Zaka; Emőke Mózsa; Dávid Pukancsik; Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy; János Fodor; Csaba Polgár
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Decline of cosmetic outcomes following accelerated partial breast irradiation using intensity modulated radiation therapy: results of a single-institution prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Adam L Liss; Merav A Ben-David; Reshma Jagsi; James A Hayman; Kent A Griffith; Jean M Moran; Robin B Marsh; Lori J Pierce
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Current role of modern radiotherapy techniques in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Gokhan Ozyigit; Melis Gultekin
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

9.  Impact of residual and intrafractional errors on strategy of correction for image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  Gang Cai; Wei-Gang Hu; Jia-Yi Chen; Xiao-Li Yu; Zi-Qiang Pan; Zhao-Zhi Yang; Xiao-Mao Guo; Zhi-Min Shao; Guo-Liang Jiang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): A review of available techniques.

Authors:  Christopher F Njeh; Mark W Saunders; Christian M Langton
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.