Literature DB >> 21435489

The effect of patient selection and surgical technique on the results of Conserve® Plus hip resurfacing--3.5- to 14-year follow-up.

Harlan C Amstutz1, Karren M Takamura, Michel J Le Duff.   

Abstract

The results of metal-on-metal hip Conserve® Plus resurfacings with up to 14 years of follow-up with and without risk factors of small component size and/or large femoral defects were compared as performed with either first- or second-generation surgical techniques. There was a 99.7% survivorship at ten years for ideal hips (large components and small defects) and a 95.3% survivorship for hips with risk factors optimized technique has measurably improved durability in patients with risk factors at the 8-year mark. The lessons learned can help offset the observed learning curve of resurfacing.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21435489     DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  9 in total

1.  Letter to the editor: the withdrawn ASR™ THA and hip resurfacing systems: how have our patients fared over 1 to 6 years?

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01

4.  Should we worry about periacetabular interference gaps in hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Bruno Gomes; Michael Olsen; Michael Donnelly; Ashesh Kumar; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Hip resurfacing: a 40-year perspective.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-14

6.  Adoption of hip resurfacing arthroplasty at hospital for special surgery: a cohort study.

Authors:  Edwin P Su; Sherwin L Su
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-05

7.  Intermediate-term trends in serum levels of metal ions after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wenxue Jiang; Yanlin Wan; Peng Cui; Xianjia Ning
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Computer navigation experience in hip resurfacing improves femoral component alignment using a conventional jig.

Authors:  Zachary Morison; Akshay Mehra; Michael Olsen; Michael Donnelly; Emil Schemitsch
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  High Re-Operation Rates Using Conserve Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Articulations.

Authors:  S L Mogensen; T Jakobsen; H Christoffersen; N Krarup
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-03-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.