Literature DB >> 21434993

Reproducibility of in vivo corneal confocal microscopy as a novel screening test for early diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy.

P Hertz1, V Bril, A Orszag, A Ahmed, E Ng, P Nwe, M Ngo, B A Perkins.   

Abstract

AIM: With the goal of identifying a valid biomarker of early diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy, we aimed to identify the most reliable in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) parameter for detection of abnormality of small nerve fibre morphology.
METHODS: Cross-sectional examination of 46 subjects (26 with Type 1 diabetes and 20 healthy volunteers) examined by corneal confocal microscopy for intra- and interobserver reproducibility by the intraclass correlation coefficient method. Corneal nerve fibre density, nerve branch density, nerve fibre length and tortuosity were measured on the same day that subjects underwent clinical and electrophysiological examination.
RESULTS: The 26 subjects with Type 1 diabetes had mean age and diabetes duration 42.8 ± 16.9 and 22.7 ± 16.4 years, respectively. Twelve of those subjects (46%) did not meet criteria for diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy, while five (19%) had mild, three (12%) had moderate and six (23%) had severe diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy. None of the healthy volunteers (mean age 41.4 ± 17.3 years) had polyneuropathy. Re-examination of selected corneal confocal microscopy images or sets of 40 images yielded very good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients for all parameters. However, only one parameter (corneal nerve fibre length) emerged with consistently very good reproducibility using a clinically relevant 'study-level' protocol of subject re-examination (intra-observer intraclass correlation coefficient 0.72; interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient 0.73). Despite no differences in intraclass correlation coefficient between subgroups, corneal nerve fibre length was significantly lower (14.76 vs. 16.15 mm/mm(2), P = 0.04) in those with diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: Development of corneal confocal microscopy may need to focus on the measurement of corneal nerve fibre length, as it appears to have superior reliability in comparison with other parameters, and as evidence exists for its potential as a clinical biomarker of early diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy.
© 2011 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2011 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21434993     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03299.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  54 in total

Review 1.  Corneal confocal microscopy to assess diabetic neuropathy: an eye on the foot.

Authors:  Mitra Tavakoli; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

2.  Rapid automated diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with in vivo corneal confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Ioannis N Petropoulos; Uazman Alam; Hassan Fadavi; Andrew Marshall; Omar Asghar; Mohammad A Dabbah; Xin Chen; James Graham; Georgios Ponirakis; Andrew J M Boulton; Mitra Tavakoli; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Sensory nerve regeneration after epithelium wounding in normal and diabetic cornea.

Authors:  Fu-Shin Yu; Jia Yin; Patrick Lee; Frank S Hwang; Mark McDermott
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-26

4.  Normative values for corneal nerve morphology assessed using corneal confocal microscopy: a multinational normative data set.

Authors:  Mitra Tavakoli; Maryam Ferdousi; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Julie Morris; Nicola Pritchard; Andrey Zhivov; Dan Ziegler; Danièle Pacaud; Kenneth Romanchuk; Bruce A Perkins; Leif E Lovblom; Vera Bril; J Robinson Singleton; Gordon Smith; Andrew J M Boulton; Nathan Efron; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Differential reduction in corneal nerve fiber length in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Maxwell S Stem; Munira Hussain; Stephen I Lentz; Nilesh Raval; Thomas W Gardner; Rodica Pop-Busui; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.852

Review 6.  New vistas in the diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Nikolaos Papanas; Dan Ziegler
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  [In vivo imaging of the corneal nerve plexus : From single image to large scale map].

Authors:  B Köhler; S Allgeier; A Bartschat; R F Guthoff; S Bohn; K-M Reichert; O Stachs; K Winter; R Mikut
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 8.  [Confocal microscope examination of the corneal nerve plexus as biomarker for systemic diseases : View from the corneal nerve plexus on diabetes mellitus disease].

Authors:  S Baltrusch
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Repeated monitoring of corneal nerves by confocal microscopy as an index of peripheral neuropathy in type-1 diabetic rodents and the effects of topical insulin.

Authors:  Debbie K Chen; Katie E Frizzi; Lucie S Guernsey; Kelsey Ladt; Andrew P Mizisin; Nigel A Calcutt
Journal:  J Peripher Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 10.  Corneal confocal microscopy: a new technique for early detection of diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  N Papanas; D Ziegler
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.