Literature DB >> 2143408

Measuring quality of life today: methodological aspects.

D F Cella1, D S Tulsky.   

Abstract

While it is recognized that quality of life is ultimately as important as quantity of life, efforts to implement quality of life measurement often fail. Two basic reasons for that failure include: 1) definitional differences, where different investigators attribute different meaning to the term and, as a result, are measuring different endpoints; and 2) insufficient information about available measures, which can lead to improper test selection and unnecessary regeneration of new items. Included in this paper is a table that reviews many available quality of life measures that have been designed for, or frequently used with, people with cancer. Proper selection of measures and supplementary questions is an important first step toward a successful evaluation of quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2143408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)        ISSN: 0890-9091            Impact factor:   2.990


  80 in total

1.  Quality of life assessment in adults with type 1 Gaucher disease.

Authors:  B J Masek; K B Sims; C M Bove; M S Korson; P Short; D K Norman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  M Rothman; C Farup; W Stewart; L Helbers; J Zeldis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Oncologists' use of quality of life information: results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians.

Authors:  A Bezjak; P Ng; R Skeel; A D Depetrillo; R Comis; K M Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Are quality of life measures patient centred?

Authors:  A J Carr; I J Higginson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

5.  The impact of nausea and vomiting upon quality of life measures.

Authors:  J M Bliss; B Robertson; P J Selby
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-12

6.  Construction and validation of a quality of life instrument for young adults.

Authors:  Henian Chen; Patricia Cohen; Stephanie Kasen; Kathy Gordan; Rebecca Dufur; Elizabeth Smailes
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Can we identify the poorest quality of life? Assessing the importance of quality of life using the WHOQOL-100.

Authors:  Suzanne M Skevington; Kathryn A O'Connell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Principles of quality of life assessment in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  B R Cassileth
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Self-perception versus professional assessment of functional outcome after ablative surgery in patients with oral cancer.

Authors:  Benedicta E Beck-Broichsitter; Jörn Huck; Thomas Küchler; Daniela Hauke; Jürgen Hedderich; Jörg Wiltfang; Stephan T Becker
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Describing the health-related quality of life impact of HIV infection: findings from a study using the HIV Overview of Problems--Evaluation System (HOPES).

Authors:  P A Ganz; C A Coscarelli Schag; B Kahn; L Petersen; K Hirji
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.