Literature DB >> 1643598

Incontinence in institutions: costs and contributing factors.

M J Borrie1, H A Davidson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative independent contributions of mobility and mental function to the prevalence rate of incontinence in a long-term care hospital and to establish the baseline prevalence rate and cost of incontinence before implementation of a continence program.
DESIGN: Prevalence survey.
SETTING: Long-term care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All 457 inpatients (mean age of men 73.6 years, of women 73.8 years) who met the defined criteria for degree of urinary and fecal incontinence, mobility and mental function. Of the 447 questionnaires that were returned 12 were incomplete. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Degree of urinary and fecal incontinence and costs of incontinence as measured by nursing time spent dealing with incontinent patients, laundry and incontinence supplies.
RESULTS: The prevalence rate of urinary incontinence was 62%, fecal incontinence 46% and combined incontinence 44%. The mean time spent each day dealing with incontinence was 52.5 minutes per patient. The total annual cost of incontinence per patient was $9771. Mobility and mental function were independent predictors of frequency of urinary and fecal incontinence. Frequency of incontinent events was the strongest predictor of quantity of linen soiled, but immobility was the strongest predictor of nursing time spent dealing with incontinence.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence rate of urinary incontinence depends on patient characteristics and the definition of incontinence. A management approach to incontinence could lower laundry and supply costs, and improvements in mobility could reduce nursing time spent dealing with incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1643598      PMCID: PMC1336202     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  9 in total

1.  Stressed nurses dealing with incontinent patients.

Authors:  L C Yu; D L Kaltreider
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.254

Review 2.  The economic impact of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  T W Hu
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.076

Review 3.  The prevalence and scope of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  E A Mohide
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.076

4.  The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function.

Authors:  P Bates; W E Bradley; E Glen; D Griffiths; H Melchior; D Rowan; A Sterling; N Zinner; T Hald
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The nursing costs of urinary incontinence in a nursing home population.

Authors:  M Cella
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.208

6.  Prevalence of geriatric urinary dysfunction in a chronic care hospital.

Authors:  G R Fernie; M A Jewett; D Autry; P J Holliday; M L Zorzitto
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Urinary incontinence in elderly nursing home patients.

Authors:  J G Ouslander; R L Kane; I B Abrass
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Urinary incontinence in the elderly: physiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  M E Williams; F C Pannill
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Urinary dysfunction in a geriatric long-term care population: prevalence and patterns.

Authors:  M A Jewett; G R Fernie; P J Holliday; M E Pim
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 5.562

  9 in total
  22 in total

Review 1.  Novel surgical approaches to fecal incontinence: neurostimulation and artificial anal sphincter.

Authors:  Xiaotuan Zhao; Pankaj J Pasricha
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-10

2.  Minimising the cost of urinary incontinence in nursing homes.

Authors:  J Steel; D Fonda
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Trends and current issues in adult fecal incontinence (FI): Towards enhancing the quality of life for FI patients.

Authors:  Gino C Matibag; Hiroshi Nakazawa; Paolo Giamundo; Hiko Tamashiro
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  New options for the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  David A Margolin
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2008

Review 5.  Medical management of fecal incontinence in challenging populations: a review.

Authors:  David Lee; Gaurav Arora
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

6.  Survey of geriatricians on the effect of fecal incontinence on nursing home referral.

Authors:  Madhusudan Grover; Jan Busby-Whitehead; Mary H Palmer; Steve Heymen; Olafur S Palsson; Patricia S Goode; Marsha Turner; William E Whitehead
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  Habit retraining for the management of urinary incontinence in adults.

Authors:  J Ostaszkiewicz; L Johnston; B Roe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

8.  [Psychosocial burden of the elderly with incontinence - a qualitative analysis].

Authors:  Anne Ahnis; Nina Knoll
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 1.281

9.  Onset and risk factors for fecal incontinence in a US community.

Authors:  Enrique Rey; Rok Seon Choung; Cathy D Schleck; Alan R Zinsmeister; G Richard Locke; Nicholas J Talley
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Urinary and fecal incontinence in nursing home residents.

Authors:  Felix W Leung; John F Schnelle
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.